Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The standard Ferrari Enzo not good enough for you? Why not have it customised by Pininfarina.

post-20773-1155824398.jpg

Most collectors would be happy enough to just own a Ferrari — any Ferrari.

There wouldn't be many who would feel the need to remodel one, let alone a top-of-the-range Enzo worth close to $2 million.

Computer modelling was used to help design the P4/5, the shape of the Enzo being altered to take on the domed roof, rear wing and rear exhaust outlets of the 330 P4.

More than 200 components were especially made for the car.

The body is made from carbon fibre, and the entire turret is a single-shell windscreen cut to accommodate butterfly-wing doors.

The whole project probably cost Glickenhaus about $8 million.

And an interview with the owner.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130719-why-mess-with-perfection/
Share on other sites

I think it looks pretty cool. But for that money... that an Aston, Porka GT, Porka 997 turboS, Ford GT, big arse house, small unit up the coast, small unit down the coast, and invest the rest so you dont need to work again.

I think ferrari is such a wank.

They have cars that cost around 350,000 for a base model and then have factory options like "Handling package" and "brake package" It's a Ferrari you'd think they'd turn and stop pretty well out of the shop.

wank factor = 11 well call me a wanker cause i would swap my skyline for it anyday .good luck to bloke for daring to be different and if ya can afford the 8 mill why would ya give a rats arse what anyone else thought i know i wouldnt lol

lol.. no seriously, good on him for investing his time and effort into his passion, i wish i could make my own custom supercar

... but still that thing is so ugly it makes the original enzo look good

So what he should have done is invest in a BN Body Kit, 24" chrome Zeptana's and some pulsing neons maybe ?? :O:D

There's a Chop project for you ................ :)

Is it just me or does a stock enzo look better

Each to their own I guess, but I with you Lee. I prefer the "stock" Enzo.

Not that it matters because pics on the internet is the closest I'll ever come to owning one :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
×
×
  • Create New...