Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you still keen to get your beast checked out on DrDrifts dyno? i'm free all this week :D

It wont be happening for a few weeks, teh car still hasnt left the paint shop, so thesetup isnt back on proplery yet. It wont be happening before Dutton as i just wont have time, the only dyno time the thing will see is at the mechanic/tuners

new graph is up in the first post, the mechanic read it wrong as he only glanced over when he called me.... it was actually 270.8 which is bit lower but im still way happy... that was at around 21.5psi going down to 20psi up top

looks like a cliff though

they said it has potential for a lil more

yeah its externally gated with screamer

hks 256 cams... unsure on headwork

EDIT: just noticed but with the bov fixed n boost holding the 270 run spools a decent amount earlier

Any more info an air:fuels etc. How to the line has the thing been tuned. Quick run down to Wakefield and thrash it senseless and let me know how it goes...i want to run 20psi at Dutton which will net me around the mid 250-260rwkws.

Do you know the engine has pistons or not? Also curious to know what boost you are planning on running day to day...i hope your engine is stock as the response isnt really any different from mine when running the same boost...lol i wanna know ho much you can lean on the std engine.

hahaha

not sure on pistons but it was meant to have been rebuilt so i would assume so ... but who knows

ill be running it daily on 18/19 psi

ill have to try and get print out with af ratio's but i dont have one yet

well done dude. that's awesome power out of the RB20/22.

i have a Trust TD06-25G kit sitting in the garage which i wouldn't mind putting on my car but i'm afraid it will be too laggy.

maybe i should put the RB24 together ;-)

These engines always amaze me. From what I have seen boost control and tuning i.e timing have major impacts and can make some peoples results seem meek to what I assume could be there true potential. Goes for all engines I guess.

Was there any major boost control changes and/or tuning changes in the bottem end of the run from the 230 to 270kw runs?

Comparing razors 230 graph to Roys 230 graph if anything roys is better down low indicating maybe it isnt 2.2 but maybe it is?. At ~106km/h raz has 13psi as does roy, but roy has about 125rwkw where raz has about 112rwkw.

But bring in the 270 run and its like a different car altogether. 106km/h has 150rwkw and 20psi, the 13psi was reached at approx 99km/h this time?

I encountered the exact same thing with mine. Power started at about 170rwkw,then 200, then 230, then 280rwkw. Each time power increased my boost was increased (same turbo all along) but the boost threshold never changed. Off the spring it has 7-8psi which hits at about 4,000rpm and with the 280 run it spikes to 24psi and then settles at 20psi but once again its all in by 4,000rpm?

The major difference according to my tuner was that he used in his words "a shit load more timing" across the board to bring things on earlier and be more responsive and compensated by keeping the a/f ratios at a sane level. My a/f plot peaks at 11.5:1 and at full noise is 11.2:1.

Would love to overlay our graphs as my engine is also an unknown with many beleiving its stroked as well but my plot is in rpm not km/h.

After all that, once again congratulations on your result. I'm sure Carlh has been lurking and waiting to bombard us all lol. Hope he gets the triple tonne.

the only difference in the 230 / 270 runs was the 230 one the bov was leaking... it was plated off and boosted up.. thats why there wasnt the big drop in boost as comapred in the 230 run

i am hoping it will spool like the 270 run with the bov fixed

thanks and yeah it will be awesome when an rb20 runs 300

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah the rule of thumb with an LS is 7psi per 1000rpm. That is decidedly not enough at 6800rpm. I mainly looked for the scenarios where knock started to be picked up and it was later in the session when things were hotter, and oil was thinner, and the pressure was lower than it should be. (i.e very horrible). I am hoping with thicker oil (I was running Penrite ten tenths 10-40, the manual specifies 10-30) that does not leak that it's much improved at that time!!! I am using Project Mu Club Racer CR pads. I'm also using the Project Mu 335C fluid. The symptoms imply that it was fluid that boiled, but no bubbles seemed pretty weird to me when I bled it today. I want to try Castrol SRF as it has a much higher wet temp but, well, I have new Project Mu fluid lol... so I should at least use that. The pedal on track was really noticable. It went from basically normal feeling to instantly near-floor. The car did pull up as before, it was just very much nearly at the floor before the brakes engaged. At that point I pretty much decided the day was very done, it did *kinda* come back during that very slow cooldown lap into the pits. Felt perfectly fine driving home.
    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
×
×
  • Create New...