Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Below is a link to the 'exvitermini' web site which shows an r32 (which sounds beautiful) reach 300km/h in 13.72 seconds. How much time and money would it take to get the car to run that fast???

go to Exvitemini to download the video. If this link doesn't work go to

THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT LINKS!!!

exvitemini

If you click on the link closest to the buttom click on thre following:

then click on

Movies

>>> scroll to bottom n click more

>>> click on RH9 0-300 tests (0-300 km/h acceleration tests).

>>> download the shortest time 13.72 sec's... What to u think???

Edited by rob123456
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131336-is-this-really-possible/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

without actually watching it, im gonna say thats the veilside R32, and yes it did it in 13.72, but thats what ~1400HP gets you, aswell as consecutive 8 sec passes over the standing quater... on street tyres (nittos of course)

Bugatti did it. The Veyron does it in under 14 seconds. It has 922ft/lbs of torque from 2200rpm to 5500rpm and clocks in at a downtuned 1000hp.

Get your skyline to do that and I guess you'll come very close.

Bugatti. bugatti ,bugatti......thats all i ever hear :P;):laugh::rofl::(:(

My one faster cause its more expensive....100 engineers...two year of tests..More Money than brains.

The Buggatti Veyron......unable to leap tall building . Give me $2,000,000 Aust Dollars and I'll give you

warp drive......... :sorcerer: :sorcerer: :sorcerer:

Bugatti. bugatti ,bugatti......thats all i ever hear :O:D:(:laugh::laugh::laugh:

My one faster cause its more expensive....100 engineers...two year of tests..More Money than brains.

The Buggatti Veyron......unable to leap tall building . Give me $2,000,000 Aust Dollars and I'll give you

warp drive......... :sorcerer: :sorcerer: :sorcerer:

ffs - i agree. all i ever hear is Bugatti

Throw 2mil at a skyline with 100 engineers - now id like to see that!

Give me $2,000,000 Aust Dollars and I'll give you warp drive

Will whatever you build be nominally street legal? Will it run on standard pump fuel? Will it be stable at 400km/hr? Will it be able to be able to do it all day (assuming you can afford to refuel it), in the middle of the desert? Will the car's handling be progressive and benign enough to cope with a range of potential driver skill? Are you building it from a Skyline base car, and therefore restricted in the shape (and therefore aerodynamics) that you are not permitted to modify extensively? Can you do me a production run, with a consistent build quality across every car and a full warranty?

The Veyron does all these things.

Anyone who thinks that the Veyron is anything less than a masterpiece of engineering has no idea how much effort it takes to build any car that will go as fast as the Veyron does consistently, let alone to production quality.

Will whatever you build be nominally street legal? Will it run on standard pump fuel? Will it be stable at 400km/hr? Will it be able to be able to do it all day (assuming you can afford to refuel it), in the middle of the desert? Will the car's handling be progressive and benign enough to cope with a range of potential driver skill? Are you building it from a Skyline base car, and therefore restricted in the shape (and therefore aerodynamics) that you are not permitted to modify extensively? Can you do me a production run, with a consistent build quality across every car and a full warranty?

The Veyron isn't legal on australian roads, Yes, How stable do you think anything is at 400km/h 10cm off the ground, no neither can the veyron, driving anything with 1000hp+ isn't easy regardless of it's handling the veyron is no exception, Give me a 1/2 of the price of a veyron and I will build you a skyline based car that will out do one in every aspect, give me the factory, the team and the design and build cost and I will do a production version.

I'm not saying the veyron is a bad car, it's an awesome machine by all aspects, people just seem to get too happy over it and treat it as some godly thing that it's not. you know they are one of the only production cars that will not recoupe buildcosts in sales......if you ask me the car was nothing more than a marketing ploy to get bugatti back into the automotive market, so they were able to say we have the fastest production car...which was short lived anyway....

didnt bugatti get overtaken again by the Koenegsigg CCX ??

Ahhh no.

Bugatti also brought out a more powerful version. 1250hp or something.

Thing is the Bugatti is the 'ultimate' car. Its got awd, its still quite driveable has A/C all leather, nice pretty interior, stereo etc. FACTORY WARRENTY!!! you just wont get the same with a skyline. Sure you can make it fast. That and it wont do 400kmh.

there is a (modified) r33 gtr in a motor mag i have that clocked about 315kmh at avalon airport. beat a lambo which only got about 308kmh. but that took longer than 14 seconds to get it.

but it isn't that unreasonable to think it is possible. just look at the top fuel drag cars. they hit 400kmh in under 5 seconds, 100kmh in 1 second.

Give me a 1/2 of the price of a veyron and I will build you a skyline based car that will out do one in every aspect, give me the factory, the team and the design and build cost and I will do a production version.

You sir, smoke some powerful shit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...