Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Below is a link to the 'exvitermini' web site which shows an r32 (which sounds beautiful) reach 300km/h in 13.72 seconds. How much time and money would it take to get the car to run that fast???

go to Exvitemini to download the video. If this link doesn't work go to

THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT LINKS!!!

exvitemini

If you click on the link closest to the buttom click on thre following:

then click on

Movies

>>> scroll to bottom n click more

>>> click on RH9 0-300 tests (0-300 km/h acceleration tests).

>>> download the shortest time 13.72 sec's... What to u think???

Edited by rob123456
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131336-is-this-really-possible/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

without actually watching it, im gonna say thats the veilside R32, and yes it did it in 13.72, but thats what ~1400HP gets you, aswell as consecutive 8 sec passes over the standing quater... on street tyres (nittos of course)

Bugatti did it. The Veyron does it in under 14 seconds. It has 922ft/lbs of torque from 2200rpm to 5500rpm and clocks in at a downtuned 1000hp.

Get your skyline to do that and I guess you'll come very close.

Bugatti. bugatti ,bugatti......thats all i ever hear :P;):laugh::rofl::(:(

My one faster cause its more expensive....100 engineers...two year of tests..More Money than brains.

The Buggatti Veyron......unable to leap tall building . Give me $2,000,000 Aust Dollars and I'll give you

warp drive......... :sorcerer: :sorcerer: :sorcerer:

Bugatti. bugatti ,bugatti......thats all i ever hear :O:D:(:laugh::laugh::laugh:

My one faster cause its more expensive....100 engineers...two year of tests..More Money than brains.

The Buggatti Veyron......unable to leap tall building . Give me $2,000,000 Aust Dollars and I'll give you

warp drive......... :sorcerer: :sorcerer: :sorcerer:

ffs - i agree. all i ever hear is Bugatti

Throw 2mil at a skyline with 100 engineers - now id like to see that!

Give me $2,000,000 Aust Dollars and I'll give you warp drive

Will whatever you build be nominally street legal? Will it run on standard pump fuel? Will it be stable at 400km/hr? Will it be able to be able to do it all day (assuming you can afford to refuel it), in the middle of the desert? Will the car's handling be progressive and benign enough to cope with a range of potential driver skill? Are you building it from a Skyline base car, and therefore restricted in the shape (and therefore aerodynamics) that you are not permitted to modify extensively? Can you do me a production run, with a consistent build quality across every car and a full warranty?

The Veyron does all these things.

Anyone who thinks that the Veyron is anything less than a masterpiece of engineering has no idea how much effort it takes to build any car that will go as fast as the Veyron does consistently, let alone to production quality.

Will whatever you build be nominally street legal? Will it run on standard pump fuel? Will it be stable at 400km/hr? Will it be able to be able to do it all day (assuming you can afford to refuel it), in the middle of the desert? Will the car's handling be progressive and benign enough to cope with a range of potential driver skill? Are you building it from a Skyline base car, and therefore restricted in the shape (and therefore aerodynamics) that you are not permitted to modify extensively? Can you do me a production run, with a consistent build quality across every car and a full warranty?

The Veyron isn't legal on australian roads, Yes, How stable do you think anything is at 400km/h 10cm off the ground, no neither can the veyron, driving anything with 1000hp+ isn't easy regardless of it's handling the veyron is no exception, Give me a 1/2 of the price of a veyron and I will build you a skyline based car that will out do one in every aspect, give me the factory, the team and the design and build cost and I will do a production version.

I'm not saying the veyron is a bad car, it's an awesome machine by all aspects, people just seem to get too happy over it and treat it as some godly thing that it's not. you know they are one of the only production cars that will not recoupe buildcosts in sales......if you ask me the car was nothing more than a marketing ploy to get bugatti back into the automotive market, so they were able to say we have the fastest production car...which was short lived anyway....

didnt bugatti get overtaken again by the Koenegsigg CCX ??

Ahhh no.

Bugatti also brought out a more powerful version. 1250hp or something.

Thing is the Bugatti is the 'ultimate' car. Its got awd, its still quite driveable has A/C all leather, nice pretty interior, stereo etc. FACTORY WARRENTY!!! you just wont get the same with a skyline. Sure you can make it fast. That and it wont do 400kmh.

there is a (modified) r33 gtr in a motor mag i have that clocked about 315kmh at avalon airport. beat a lambo which only got about 308kmh. but that took longer than 14 seconds to get it.

but it isn't that unreasonable to think it is possible. just look at the top fuel drag cars. they hit 400kmh in under 5 seconds, 100kmh in 1 second.

Give me a 1/2 of the price of a veyron and I will build you a skyline based car that will out do one in every aspect, give me the factory, the team and the design and build cost and I will do a production version.

You sir, smoke some powerful shit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...