Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

post-20525-1156836511.jpg

Hey guys just got some new turbos fitted to my car and i thought id post the dyno graph up to see what u guys think. Running sort of a light tune to keep my engine alive during track days until i can afford to get a rebuild done :P . Its using a djetro pfc and still on a cat back. Plan to get a turbo back soon to try and get it to be more responsive. Any comments welcome. Cheers :D

Edited by Yawn
what injectors you running?

Im running nismo 600cc ones.

3lit3 32, from what i know i should be able to easily get 500+ hp atw but i dunno about 700 heh. Yea I know im not even close to pushing the turbos but as i said, im trying to take it on the safe side for now as i do some track work. Once i get a full engine rebuild ill go all out >_< . The dyno run was on 2 wheels.

Cheers

post-20525-1156836511.jpg

Hey guys just got some new turbos fitted to my car and i thought id post the dyno graph up to see what u guys think. Running sort of a light tune to keep my engine alive during track days until i can afford to get a rebuild done :D . Its using a djetro pfc and still on a cat back. Plan to get a turbo back soon to try and get it to be more responsive. Any comments welcome. Cheers >_<

Nice, what boost are you running? Looks around 20psi?

seems quite laggy to me. 1 bar at around 4500rpm. nice power though, but they must be fairly large low mouts as the resposnse does not look that great.

yeahh from what i know, the -5 model is slightly bigger than the -7 model, which (i think) is comparable to hks 2530s. Yeah it is rather laggy but im still running a catback so im hoping the graph shifts to the left a bit once ive got front pipes/dump pipes in.

yeah West im running slightly under 20 psi. Btw how do you know its in 5th gear? :P They are bigger than both the gt-ss and the N1s

Cheers

Edited by Yawn
yeahh from what i know, the -5 model is slightly bigger than the -7 model, which (i think) is comparable to hks 2530s. Yeah it is rather laggy but im still running a catback so im hoping the graph shifts to the left a bit once ive got front pipes/dump pipes in.

yeah West im running slightly under 20 psi. Btw how do you know its in 5th gear? :( They are bigger than both the gt-ss and the N1s

Cheers

I was only guessing :bunny: mate.

Damn, those things are bigger than Gt-ss, mad fun their. May i ask what condition is your engine in? Did you do a low boost run? Say around 14psi?

west mate, it would not be in 5th gear. most DD dynos are rated to 200km/h only. It would be either 3rd or most likely 4th gear. Even if it was in 5th (which i can promise it wasn't) it shouldn't make much difference at all. if anything it may build a little earlier as the engine is under more load.

west mate, it would not be in 5th gear. most DD dynos are rated to 200km/h only. It would be either 3rd or most likely 4th gear. Even if it was in 5th (which i can promise it wasn't) it shouldn't make much difference at all. if anything it may build a little earlier as the engine is under more load.

Thank you very much, i dont know much about Dyno thing.

post-20525-1156836511.jpg

Hey guys just got some new turbos fitted to my car and i thought id post the dyno graph up to see what u guys think. Running sort of a light tune to keep my engine alive during track days until i can afford to get a rebuild done ;) . Its using a djetro pfc and still on a cat back. Plan to get a turbo back soon to try and get it to be more responsive. Any comments welcome. Cheers :P

Mind if i ask who or which work shop that did the tune?

Are you still running standard injectors? If so whats the percentage shown at 300kw?

D-Jetro is still very new to VIC tuning scene i think though i'd love to have it, just to get rid of the air flow meters.

Mind if i ask who or which work shop that did the tune?

Are you still running standard injectors? If so whats the percentage shown at 300kw?

D-Jetro is still very new to VIC tuning scene i think though i'd love to have it, just to get rid of the air flow meters.

Airlfow meters is what makes the PFC so powerful. D-Jetro I assume was made for the american market as they had no idea how to tune a MAF based system. If you want to go MAFLESS get an Autronic because the time/cost taken to wiring in and tune will probably about the same to plugin and tune a D-jetro and at the end of the day the autronic is better.

On a more advanced engine e.g Fully rebuilt , cams/head work and tune the lagg can be taken care of through playing with cam timing , while still not loosing any of the mid range top end punch these puppies deliver.Just take it to a tuner who knows the fine tuning insides and outs of the RB26 and you will be very rewarded.Should be able to see full boost 22 -24 psi at 4500 rpm or just under but they will start pulling hard much lower than this so are still a very streetable turbo set up.

Alot of the gtr forums I visit from around the world rate these huffers above 2530s for there response and big delivery of power in the top end.

On a fairly stock engine Id put a gtss or the 2860R -7 turbo upgrade ahead of these unless of course you are taking it further down the track,these are purfect for a hard tuned street machine.

On a fully worked engine these turbs are good for 380 - 410 awkws

Just my opinion though. :)

Edited by DVSGOD

one questions I have always wondered is assimung ur've upgraded your turbo, AFM, injectors, fuel pump PFC blah blah and your making a good 300+rwkw...at what point do u need to consider internal upgrades or is this dependant on how hard you drive it? In a street app where you may only trash it occasionally...I'm wondering how the internals hold up over a 1-2 year peroid..on say 1bar or just a little over.

Just intrested as I have a RB25 with the same mods and similar output as this dyno i.e. about 300rwk on 1bar and all the goodies...now I'm wondering how long the engine will last hehe.

post-20525-1156836511.jpg

Hey guys just got some new turbos fitted to my car and i thought id post the dyno graph up to see what u guys think. Running sort of a light tune to keep my engine alive during track days until i can afford to get a rebuild done :( . Its using a djetro pfc and still on a cat back. Plan to get a turbo back soon to try and get it to be more responsive. Any comments welcome. Cheers :P

I got an r 33 GTR with a built motor and same turbos and im pushing 366 kw at all fours on 22 psi and pump fuel. My car makes 308 kw at 5600 rpm id post the dyno sheet but dont know how

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for all that information I appreciate it. To answer your questions: - Yep that's what I mean. These guys are professional painters to so I must be missing something. It's a bit hard to explain. - With the primer landing on clearcoat, I make sure that the surrounding clearcoat is scuffed to 240 grit as my epoxy primer says that I only need to sand the area to 240 grit. - Yeah so similar to the first question, assuming that the paint landed on the unscuffed clearcoat because I've seen that happen. - Yep I want to prep the surface in that order. Only reason because epoxy primer will protect it from rust and I need that atm with this crappy Sydney weather. I think I was worried about time, if I try to put the filler down but screw it up somehow and I don't have time to sand it off and reapply it then need to put primer later that it might start to rust again so I wanted to apply the primer as quick as possible to not deal with rust.  - My car has heaps of small dents, that definitely need filler but are you also sanding the area to 240 grit to fill it in with filler? I always thought you have to go to bare metal for filler to stick but that contradicts the point then that you can put filler on epoxy primer.  If you aren't going to bare metal, AND not putting epoxy primer how are you making the dent stick to the paint?
    • I did. I went to a suspension guy and he told me because I don't have adjustable camber arms it's the reason why my car veers towards the left if I take my hands off the wheel but if I drive my other every day car and take my hands off the steering wheel it goes completely straight. I think it's common with Skyline's. In order to fix the problem, I likely need gktech camber arms then nismo bushes since I have poly bushes atm, then a wheel alignment after that. With my car if I take my hands off the steering wheel on a really bumpy road before stopping at a light I have to hold my steering wheel somewhat tight otherwise my car will legit just go completely in the other direction quite quickly and I'll slam into something lol instead of stopping straight. I Believe this YouTuber had the same issue and fixed it with gktech arms. At timestmap 6:05 he talks about how the car doesn't veer anymore after installing these arms.  
    • hello! does anyone have a schematic that shows how to test the blower motor resistor for the vac system? i believe the part# is 27761-15U00. I think the resistor is toast, but would like to be able to test it somehow before i embark on the journey to find a new one. cheers! 27761-15U00
    • I don't know the answer to this, but did you have a look at the parts diagrams on amayama.com and see what they list around it for your car? As an example this should be it on my car. That's how I would check for required clips and things like that. But, I take no responsibility for you ending up with a box full of random OEM hoses, washers and clips after going down that path a few times. This definitely has never happened to me  
    • Most driving should* be done on one side of single lane divided roads. In the RHD world, you drive on the left side of the dividing line and the road is probably cambered equally on both sides. So your side of the road slopes away to the left. The same is true for the LHD world, just everything swapped to the other side and opposite slope. With a perfectly neutral, straight ahead wheel alignment designed to drive straight on a perfectly flat surface (or at least one that is level on the left-right axis, even if it has some slope in the fore-aft axis) you will not be able to drive on a cambered road without the car wanting to drift down the camber. You will need to add steering input in the opposite direction all the time. This is annoying. The solution has always been to set the camber and/or the caster to produce a continuous turning force in the opposite direction of the camber. The car will drive straight on the kind of camber for which it was set up, presumably as described in the top paragraph. But.... when the car is set up this way, as soon as you get into a lane, usually on a multi-lane surface road or highway, where the camber is not as presumed during setup, the car will usually pull to one side. In the RHD world, if you are in the fast lane on a big divided road, you are probably on the opposite camber compared to what the car was set up for (ie, sloping down to the right) and the combination of the setup and that camber will make the car want to go right pretty hard. Even a perfectly flat lane will tend to want to go right. There's no getting around it. Civil engineers who know their stuff (which is not an assumption that can always be made) will attempt to keep the variation in camber across a multi-lane road as small as possible, and if they can will attempt to make the fast lane as close to flat, or even cambered in the same direction as all the other lanes. This takes a lot of planning for drainage, control of levels, ability to deal with the elevation changes that occur at road junctions, etc etc. So it's not trivial to get it right. When they do make it work, then the annoyance is reduced, along with tyre wear, fuel consumption, etc. In theory, the civil engineers are supposed to worry about those aspects of road design also. * This used to be true, but now with very large highway systems, even just multi-lane surface roads running everywhere, it is less true now than it was, but the old assumption is the basis for describing the phenomenon, so let's just run with it for the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...