Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ME TOO! I want some 110-115 ron pump bp fuel...where do i get that?

For pump fuel you cant beat the shell optimax extreme...100 ron with some eth in it, get it tuned on that and its your best bet without going to race fuels :D Believe me, race fuel is frikken expensive....we were using martini 110 for a little while...at the time we worked out per litre $6.80 FARK!

Knock is due to too lean a mixture, too much ignition advance, too much boost-related to 1, heating issues, excessive oil in the intake...what happens is somewhere during the compression stroke one or various causes such as the ones listed interrupts the combustion process from occuring at its set time, normally going by the term PRE-ignition is the mixture ignites before its timed moment and rattles the piston side to side causing all sorts of wear n tear and costly damage. That rattle is what is referred to as a KNOCK or PINGING. Other form of knock can probably be more so referred to as PISTON SLAP, which is basically the same event of the piston rattling from side to side, but normally occurs on the power stroke and is more so due to the tolerances being too sloppy or loose and allowing the piston to move around too freely in the bore during normal operation. Both are bad for engine life...specifically piston life :stupid:

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Jut thought I'd add my experiences with ethnol.

The 98 IFS ethnol stuff did make a difference in power in the wifes mazda, but the economy was not the same. I must explain that I filled a tank and drove normally for the whole tank to see the economy. Other tanks, I did tend to put the foot down to experience the noticable difference in torque.

Also, I have a friend that has a VW dune buggy fiberglass thing with a stroker kit, and was setup for drag. They used 100% alcohol in it and the aluminium and other metal component suffered from bad corrosion. Something you wouldn't get with regular fuel. Although that 100% alcohol, you still have to wonder what that extra 10% ethnol would do to some of the metal components in the fuel system.

If you had done a search (“Sydneykid”, “Extreme” and “any date”) you would have found these posts;

February 2006

We have a new project car, an R33GTST that is in need of some TLC. One of the recent upgrades was a Power FC. As most people are aware, the default ignition maps are a little advanced for Optimax, Ultimate or Vortex 98. Not as bad as they used to be for 95 ron fuels, but still a tad. Obviously I will tune it properly eventually , but we have a few mods to go yet and I don’t have the time to tune it multiple times. So the idea was to stick the Power FC in and run it on the default maps for a couple of weeks. On Optimax and Ultimate (didn’t try Vortex) it was reaching knock of 60+ up our usual test hill in 4th gear as logged on the datalogit. The dash warning was also flashing frequently, as it is set for 60, in normal day to day driving around. When the tank was just about empty this week, we filled it up with Optimax Extreme (@ 5 cents a litre more than Optimax). Several runs up the hill and we are not seeing knock over 10. And zero dash warnings in 3 days of normal driving.

Now that is very worthwhile, there is not enough Optimix Extreme around yet for me to tune it exclusively for 100 ron, but it sure will be a useful for the odd track day or run down the ¼.

I will monitor the effects of the ethanol on the fuel lines, o’rings and seals over the next few weeks. The injectors and fuel pump will have to come out shortly so I will check their condition as well. I am not anticipating any problems, but it is still worth checking.

March 2006

After a month (~2,000k's) of running exclusively on Extreme in the R33GTST, I did a fuel filter change on the weekend. Cut it open and no sign of any foreign material, deteriorated fuel hose etc. That means zero effect from the 5% ethanol, as expected. So we will continue to use it.

Current status, after 8 months of running exclusively Shell Optimax Extreme 100 ron.

After 3 fuel filter changes I still haven’t found one sign of fuel system rubber or metal deterioration.

I cleaned the injectors last week and there is not one sign of any effect on them either. I also flow tested them and they performed exactly as they did last time I flow tested them.

Based on the results with the R33GTST, I have now started to use it in the Stagea, which I will be tuning again very shortly to take advantage of the extra performance on offer.

>_< cheers :D

Also depends if you're hitting rev limiter in which case knock value on PFC will show large numbers.

not if everything is working properly. I can nail the limit in my car and knock is no higher than normal.

is 100ron with 10% eth any more expensive? or is it cheaper then say 98 ron

Shell Optimax Extreme 100 ron is 5% ethanol and is around 5 cents litre more than Shell Optimax 98 ron.

>_< cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

Im psychic, he will say yes it is so long as its readily available so you dont have to drive 25km to get to a bowser that pumps it.

In brisbane were still like that...only like 4 or 5 stations on the northside that have extreme. Pain in the ass sometimes.

Slight comparison....bp 100 octane or (avgas) which comes in 20l drums works out at something like $2.50 per litre, so about 50bux a drum....thats still like 1 dollar more exxy then the extreme >_<

Edited by r33_racer
In your opinion, is it worth it ??

For the extra performance = Yes

That's not just max power but response from the more advanced ignition timing.

Enabling the use of standard Power FC maps = Yes

Let's face it, in performance car terms it's peanuts

60 litres X 5 cents = $3 a week.

>_< cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

As Gary has pretty obviously pointed out, you really need a re-tune to get the benifits of the ethanol. Ive seen a 22rwkw gain (modified r32 gtr..) from moving from 98 to 100 octane with ethanol in a HPI magazine, they explained that you can put alot more igintion timing into the motor, however it did run abit lean and make less power without being tuned for the new fuel.... something to keep in mind if you have a tuned modified car, if its a stocko it shouldn't hurt.

"Also depends if you're hitting rev limiter in which case knock value on PFC will show large numbers."

'not if everything is working properly. I can nail the limit in my car and knock is no higher than normal."

If you use a std or walbro you may [stress may] get this effect..............they can run a bit lean at the top of the scale!!

Please show an example of this, and explain why knock would be more at the rev limiter?

Ok.

My understanding is that the PFC cuts the revs by cutting fuel. As the revs quickly approach redline the PFC cuts fuel but still maintains ignition timing as per usual. If this happens during an injector cycle and they are shut off prematurely then the air/fuel mixture is a little leaner for that cycle and pre-ignition may occur. The revs drop below the red line and injectors become active again for a bit before hitting redline and fuel cuts out again... etc... Each time this happens, the knock sensor picks it up.

So basically if you rev your engine and dont come off redline quickly you'll see your knock values increase the longer you hold your foot there.

Please correct me if Im wrong, but that is my understanding.

Nah, ignition is cut, not fuel. That why you see big backfires on skylines sitting on the revlimiter.

I'm curious, please explain when, where, etc, you have seen high knock on a engine reving at the revlimiter?

Thanks

no it wont do crap, its all wives tales. but yes putting optimax extreme in your stock ecu'd skyline is likely to achieve less detonation, but nothing more. i wouldnt expect much detonation on 98 premium anyway.

Ok.

My understanding is that the PFC cuts the revs by cutting fuel. As the revs quickly approach redline the PFC cuts fuel but still maintains ignition timing as per usual. If this happens during an injector cycle and they are shut off prematurely then the air/fuel mixture is a little leaner for that cycle and pre-ignition may occur. The revs drop below the red line and injectors become active again for a bit before hitting redline and fuel cuts out again... etc... Each time this happens, the knock sensor picks it up.

So basically if you rev your engine and dont come off redline quickly you'll see your knock values increase the longer you hold your foot there.

Please correct me if Im wrong, but that is my understanding.

does this happen to you? Having spent a little time on the limiter (sometimes on purpose, ie burnout, and sometimes just brushed it on gear change) I have never experienced high knock levels. What knock level do you get in usual driving, and conversely what do you reach when hitting the limiter?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Either the WG is reaching full opening, or it is not. The "it is not" case could only occur if there was not enough time available to swing the valve fully open during that boost event. I would consider that to be unlikely, as this is a commercial product that is in use elsewhere, so it really should work. But in your case, because there is definitely SOMETHING wrong, it should not be assumed that things like that are working as they should. You should put a video camera where it can see the actuator (if at all possible) during a run to see how far it is moving.
    • I think you're mostly on the ball there. With the straight gate, I suspect the weight of the spring will determine how quickly the gate can close, when not run with active pressure drive on both sides of the diaphragm. Otherwise, with drive on both sides of the diaphragm, you could almost go without a spring at all, only needing one to make sure that the thing was actually closed while completely off boost and not having pressure available to drive it closed. Butterfly valves have mostly symmetric loading when there is flow going through them, meaning that the gas hitting the upstream part of the blade is balanced by the gas hitting the downstream part of the blade, which means you don't need actuator torque to overcome any non-symmetric flow induced loads. But the gas flow does impart a purely normal load against the shaft, which transfers into the bush/bearing at each end of the shaft and does increase the torque required to make the shaft turn. Only a little, but it is there. I have no feeling for the amount of force involved in a WG application, but it certainly could make an argument for a decent spring weight being required. But all of this is just peripheral to the actual problem here.
    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
    • lol nice, I wouldn't worry about sanding back the filler to check for rust then. Yep very much a thing. Personally I don't do the panel beating, its very easy to have a panel beater sort that out for you. If they aren't doing any prep work the actual panel beating generally doesn't take long at all.  Have you taken before pictures before you started this project? I'd be keen to see the before and afters when you're done.
    • Some good discussion in here, for the most part I can't really add too much to it - thought I'd add some notes to the datalog screen shot that probably aren't news to anyone but a good prop... this is assuming 25psi-ish should be the boost ceiling given the first post refers to 23psi.   To state the obvious, this issue seems super weird.  Turbo speed seems pretty lethagic to build, like the turbo isn't getting as much drive as it needs - and it doesn't help that wgdc keeps rising AFTER boost target then completely shuts duty at a point, which in theory should have the straight gate dump heaps past the turbo and funnily enough causes the huge drop off.  It seems like pretty blunt boost control tuning but I'd not call that the primary issue, so much as possibly not helping the situation. I'm curious, what does a pull look like with purely mechanical boost control?  Like purely wastegate?   There are things in this log and story that make it sound like there could be a significant restriction in the intercooler piping or something - but then it's also overshooting boost target which is NOT what you'd expect with a restriction.   I can see where people are coming from with the non-linear wastegate bypass (not that any valves are linear for this kind of thing), but it still doesn't make sense that it can't hold <20psi on a 12psi spring.    Have you, or can you try measuring pressure pre-intercooler?  Be pretty interesting to see what's happening there vs in the intake manifold - sorry if I've repeated old ground, I've kinda skimmed over but I could have missed something.  In terms of comments regarding the wg spring being closer to boost target, I haven't used a straight gate but part of the reason for having close to wg target is about fighting backpressure as well - I might be wrong, but I'd have thought that part of the point of using a butterfly valve like the straight gate does you actually don't have to resist pressure at all, on EITHER side of the gate.   It shouldn't need too much leverage to start opening, the spring being more to do with where it triggers opening as opposed to resisting boost & EMAP, though smarter people can correct me if I'm wrong there.  
×
×
  • Create New...