Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think I got flashed last night in St Kilda rd by a fixed red light camera... really sucks as I am SURE I was running the light as it was amber!! Ive never had a fine for running a traffic light in all of my 8 year driving history and this thing was sus! Heck the last time I got done for speeding was back on my P plates over 6 years ago!!

ANyway do you lose 3 demerit points for running the red light? Also how much is the fine?

Im gonna appeal/fight this fine no matter what!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134689-red-light-camera/
Share on other sites

You'll loose.

Amber = prepare to stop. Not accelerate and try get passed it, lookup what the amber is defined as and what your meant to do...

You havent got a leg to stand on :)

Pay the fine (around $250 i think) and get on with it.

You'll loose.

Amber = prepare to stop. Not accelerate and try get passed it, lookup what the amber is defined as and what your meant to do...

You havent got a leg to stand on :)

Pay the fine (around $250 i think) and get on with it.

I was already passing through the traffic light as it was turning amber! Even if I slammed the brakes I would of ended up in the middle of the interscation!

ive heard of people beating red traffic light fines, most dont do anything about it and just pay the fine. 250 bucks? whatta jib!

You'll loose.

Amber = prepare to stop. Not accelerate and try get passed it, lookup what the amber is defined as and what your meant to do...

You havent got a leg to stand on :)

Pay the fine (around $250 i think) and get on with it.

Agree with Ash here. Traffic lights have all loop holes I know covered except for trucks on their length.

E.g

Dont enter intersection if unclear on the other side

You should be able to stop if it turns amber by adjusting your speed on the approach

Amber doesnt mean boot it (even though we have all done it)

Not having a go at you but unlike speeding where things can be contested, I dont know of any with traffic lights. Are you sure it wasnt a car near you that triggered it?

We get loads for work for trucks that go through on green but get pinged on the red due to the length. Our driver employer at work gets most of the trucks out of the fines and points as they are green on entry to the intersection.

Ill appeal as I did not enter the intersaction when the lights were red. Cheers for the tips.

If you get a fine in the mail, first thing to do is to go to the camera enforcment office (or whatever it's called these days) and see the photograph(s). That will tell the story.

There should be two flashes, the first being when you cross the first line AFTER the light turns red and the second being for crossing the second line. I have a family friend who is a taxi driver and whenever he runs the first line on red he just turns right and avoids the second flash.

If you tried to beat the light, you may have been done for speeding and not running the red :(.

Ask for a photo (you'll have to pay for it) make sure they don't tamper with the pic by giving you a zoomed in pic of your number plate only. The photo will show what colour the lights were.

Yeah you wont get a fine if you entered on the amber. They also give slight tolerance (delay) once it changes to red as well.

They take two photos, one of you crossing the line with the red light, and another showing that you proceeded through the intersection. If the second one shows that you stopped and reversed back, you dont get a fine.

So in conclusion, you shouldn't get a red light fine.

You might have a speeding fine coming if you were speeding at the time though...

If it was the camera near the end of St Kilda Rd I would fight it.

I have driven past that spot a number of times and that camera goes off with nothing around.

Seriously, I was driving up to it and it flashed twice and I was like WTF? There was NOTHING to take a photo of.

Good luck

Edited by x2shy
Is it was the camera near the end of St Kilda Rd I would fight it.

I have drive past that spot a number of times and that camera goes off with nothing around.

Seriously, I was driving up to it and it flashed twice and I was like WTF? There was NOTHING to take a photo of.

Good luck

Hah... why am I not surprised? :)

It was the camera which points into the inner (from what I gathered) lane of St Kilda Rd. This is very close to the entrance into Fitzroy St so yeah right towards the end of St Kilda rd.

Seriously I never ran a red light arghh! I dont do stupid shit like that. I didnt even plant my foot as I saw I was entering the amber light and had enough pace to get out while the traffic lights were amber.

I am fighting this thing as soon as it comes in. If I did run a red light Id own up.

Cheers mate!

to clarify. when i designed the logic in the early setups if it was amber you would be ok. The idea is that they are fixed red-light speed so if you speed up and went over the limit to make the lightst you will be flashed also and possible get both a red light and speeding fine.

however doesn't mean its always perfect - after all I'm not working or helping these companies anymore :blush:

with all new fines that come in the mail by law now it must have a photo of the license plate clear , and also a zoomed out version showing the full car ..but like all things they can tamper with the pics, just hope it doesnt turn up

the fixed camera on the last intersection on st kilda rd outbound just before entering princess hwy is a redlight and speed camera. if you didn't run the red, you probably got snapped for speeding over 60km/h :(

Hmm cant recall I was speeding. Anyway as others have said, lets wait and see. I may be back... :P

I was travelling down St Kilda rd on Saturday & saw the driver in front of me get flashed at the same intersection, the lights had just turned amber as she entered the intersection. I thought maybe a faulty camera until I read GTTR34's post.

Just hang in there for the time being.

One newly installed at Bay Road next to Southland on Nepean Hwy, flashed a couple of times at the car in front of me this morning while the lights were on green. I even went through on green. It looks like one of the new speed camera ones. Am wondering if maybe they are set up as a straight fixed speed camera as well although my understanding was it only picked speed up if you booted it through on the amber/red.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...