Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I recently rebuilt the motor and went for quality products:

HKS GT-SS turbos

HKS Conrods

HKS Pistons

HKS actuators

HKS exhaust manifolds

HKS dump pipes

HKS front pipes

HKS intercooler piping kit

HKS spark plugs

HKS fuel pump

Nismo fuel regulator

Nismo 555cc injectors

Nismo racing thermostat

Nissan N1 oil pump

Trust/Greddy heavy duty timing belt

Apexi power intake kit

PWR aluminium radiator

PWR intercooler

Tomei metal head gasket

Tomei poncams

I'm not after a massive horsepower street machine. I sold the 2530's as I found them too laggy on track. It's a track car primarily and I need a lot of response and power down low/mid for coming out of corners. Power at the redline's no use to me.

I got 250kw at all 4's on the dyno at 1.4bar of boost. Tuner says it's a very very conservative and safe tune and absolutely zero knocking.

I've seen many people on these forums get 250kw with a dead stock internals and turbos!!! I'm just wondering what you guys think of this. I've put so much cash into this, and 250kw seems to be a little low, but I'm not sure. I'd appreciate your thoughts.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135631-so-ive-just-tuned-the-car/
Share on other sites

1.4bar sounds like a lot of boost for 250awkw, though makes sense if it is really a conservative, safe tune with zero knock. You have to remember that stock cars with 250awkw probably don't have long to live - yours will be fine for a long time as it's been built properly with all supporting mods covered and strong internals.

I think the problem is that you have too many pistons and too many conrods. It's crowded in there!

No but seriously, which type poncams?

Whose dyno?

Dyno graph please, preferably showing boost, afr's and power.

Sounds like your missing 50kw to me.

Oh and do you have cam gears on there that you forgot to mention and if so what are they set to?

No cam gears is a sin :dry:

Im surprised you spent the $$$$ on HKS rods... the stockers are good for 450rwkw.

But yeah, your missin around 50rwkw, but if the tune is super rich, then you kinda answered ur own question as already stated

Internals dont really give you power. So cams and turbos are about the only things that will givce you power. That said for that boost level i would sure be hoping its a low reading dyno. As even with all the good internals its a lot of boost to be running only to be makign that sort of power.

Also, you have all those mods for reliability/strength. Did you modify the R32 cranks oil drive to run the N1 oil pump?

The shopping list looks great, it just seems to be missing something...and in my books a 1.4bar tune is not conservative for that power. Surely you are better of getting the fueling and ignition better sorted and running less boost forthe same power.

Is it the same tuner as was responsible for the tune with the 2530s? Its possible thats the problem. Its makign power from boost, not form accurate control of fuel and ignition?????

perhaps look at getting it run on another dyno too see what's up?

my 32 with stock cams, stock injectors, stock AFMs, stock turbos (i think), stock intercooler, stock dump pipes is currently making 267kw atrw. Had 270 but added a little extra fuel up top for some extra safety. it's only running 1bar boost. 250kw with all that gear, and 1.4bar should be up around 300kw + even with a very conservative tune.

Yep. My gut says that something's not quite right. Not with the set-up, perhaps more with the tune. If I get someone else to tune the car I potentially might void any sort of warranty I have on the engine. I'll have to look into this.

Having said all that, and having read up on similar set-ups. I'd say I am missing about 50kw. Having 50 more and still a very safe and conservative tune should be possible.

If you are running a Pfc then the knock level also picks up mechanical noise/piston slap etc etc. Still a fresh motor, i hope it wouldnt get a knock reading over 50, as my std motor doesnt even knock over 50. I know of some motors that dont go over 20.

If they are listening for pinging then id say none is the only acceptable answer.

And i wouldnt be too worried about getting a "safe and reliable" tune. I would think you have spent the money on good internals, good turbos, good cooling, then they should be able to just tune the motor well to make the power it makes. That means they shouldnt be too worried about throwing extra fuel at it, retarding timing etc...It doesnt make sense to, the components you have are rated well above whatever the turbos can ever deliver.

I once had a conservative tune. It was a dog off boost, it used lots of fuel and it ran hot. Turns out the ignition may have been retarded so much that when the exhaust valves were opening the burn was still going, throwing a lot of heat into the water jackets. Got a "good" tune with good a/fs, i assume its healthy amounts of timing as the thing drives really well off boost and it makes more power, runs cooler and uses less fuel. Im guessign it would have also been more responsive but i changed exhaust housings at the same time so cant say for sure. And has been reliable for a number of years now.

anything under 30 should not worry you. aiming for zero reading on the controller is a bit nuts and could well be impossible. before getting anyone else to tune it, i would just run it up on someone elses dyno and have them take a peak at the tune. that shouldn't affect the warranty.

give race solutions a try.

My 32 gtr just has power fc, exhaust (including front pipes) 550cc in jectors and runs 1 bar. it puts out 224kw at all 4 wheels and on a different dyno 253kw at the rears. When it was being tuned the knock level stayed under 11, however on one occassion in over three years my check engine light did flash at me a few times going through mount white in COLD foggy weather.

Actually, i have seen photos you have posted of your car. I think your car is too far gone for help. Best give it to me now.... :)

Stick with it, i have now been for a few rides in GTRs running GT-SS setups and they are truly awesome...you just need to get it sorted

Justin usually on the PFCs the engine checklight flashes 3 times to indicated knock over 60.

As Roy said the PFC picks up other "noise" as well so for me as long as I dont see that engine checklight flashing three times im not too worried about knock levels and so far so good...touch wood.

I go to the same tuner as Beer Baron goes to....or should that be the other way around cause I went to him first :) hehehe

But yeah I understand your situation with the warranty and all but if you are keen on trying another tuner than try Hitman.

His real name is Matt and he works with his brother in law Maroun at Race Solutions in Penrith.

0417 259 391 (Matts mobile)

Indy is meant to be pretty good with cars from what i've heard and has some good experience from O/S which he has brought with him.. I believe he has a skyline as well? is that correct.. completely diverging here.. :) however I know some people who swear by him..

Does seem low - maybe ask him to retune it to be "less conservative".. got a Dyno graph we can have a peak at?

Indy's a great mechanic. He's helped be to build my car and what we've always gone for is longevity. A bullet proof engine. I am sure 250awkw would be great on the circuit for years to come. It's what my car's made for.

I've talked to Indy and we're going to do another map on the Power FC next week. We're hitting 300 this time, all good. It won't be as "safe" as the 250 set-up but that's to be expected I suppose.

Thanks for all the input guys. Much appreciated. Very glad to have these forums around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...