Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

whats the kw difference between power at the fly or at the wheels .. its like .. 50kw difference? but in which favour?

cheers :)

Johno

theres more power at the fly then at the wheels. power is lost due to a whole bunch of things, like friction. i'm sure someone will give you a better answer, but theres my 2 cents.

You can also have the halfway point and measure power at the hubs, which eliminates power loss through tyre heat/friction, but still has transmission/drivetrain losses, just to complicate things further...

it takes power to turn the gearbox, diff, etc.

on a stock car a very rough conversion is flywheel kw = rear wheel horsepower.

your average drivetrain takes out about 30-40kw.

yeah bout 30-40kw is lost from the flywheel to the rear treads.

It's not a "30-40 KW is lost"

Other wise a car that only pushes say 60KW stock at the fly, would only be 20-30 at the wheels, BUT this isn't so.

What it actually is, is approximately 30% loss in a RWD for an auto

About 25% loss for a RWD in manual

And around 20% is the general give for a FWD car of either manual or auto.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
    • To be fair it's the other way around. 300kw is boring in a modern Golf or BMW. They are so competent / well-engineered / devoid of emotion that you have to go stupid fast to feel anything. Whereas the <300kw RB still makes all the right noises and it feels good to drive. Can pull off at the lights with the turbo whooshing and the blow-off pssshing and feel like the coolest kid on the block. Just don't look to the side where you'll see the bored housewifes in their shitbox Yaris/Corolla/Camry that kept up because you didn't go fast at all
    • 300kW is so boring in a Skyline, you'll get spanked by someone's mum's Golf with Alibaba pipes, and an email tune.
×
×
  • Create New...