Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think T04 means that it will work well if the street is smooth.

But if you come across bad road conditions and offset bumps where the car hits a bump on only one side, then it will be harsher and you'll get less traction.

From my understanding, you will get less traction from a bumpy road only if you have lousy or screwed shocks.

no, funnily enough dave knows what he's talking about. increasing the stiffness using bars will reduce body roll which is good. but it also has the effect of reducing traction at that end. often when you have an understeering car, you run a stiffer rear bar. this reduces grip at the rear, and helps the front end turn.

So sway bars on a car with firm coilovers is not a good idea?

I wouldn't recommend it.

I have a set of adjustable swaybars spec'ed up by Roadholder Suspension. With my OEM suspension I ran them on the stiffest setting and they were great. Good balance, and still great traction.

When I went to Tein Flex, the tail would snap out at the drop of a hat. Even now, with the bars dialled as soft as they'll go, I still have problems putting power down around low speed corners. Part of it could be my pissweak tyres, but compared to pre-Flex I still get more slip.

What spring rates were you running with the Tein Flex?

And what thickness are your bars?

My spring rates are 5kg front 4kg rear, hence Whiteline recommended the 20mm rear bar instead of the 22mm rear bar, adjusted to full soft.

Are your spring rates and bar rates higher?

Well a friend borrows my adjustable swayabrs so when my car finally got back on the road i ran it for a few days without swaybars until i could install them again.

The car lit up the tyres like an animal. I thought the tyres must have hardened etc whilst it had been off the road. Put the swayabars back on and with the same tyres the car just hooked up like it used to. So?!?!?!?!?!

I wouldnt have expected it. As i read about drag guys removing them to save weight. If they affect traction then i cant see them doing that.

But it was even the same stretch of street that the thing all of a sudden found traction.

AS for losing traction with bigger bars. It could be right, but im not entirely sure. The bigger the bar then the less independent the suspension becomes with undulations/pot holes on one side of the car affecting the other side. But i dont htink that actually hurts traction as such, who tries to drive fast on crappy / bumpy surfaces?

Also if they reduced traction, why would race drivers bar up their car. An example i read about was the old Kmart team. Murphy like big spring rates in the car while Kelly liked less spring but more bar. Cars lapped within a poofteenth of one another so cant be that bad.

Personally i now run even bigger swaybars then most, and so far its all good. Maybe crashes over shitty roads more, but i cannot be sure as it was ages since i last drive the car and any car will feel rough after having driven a Jazz for so long recently

You have to differentiate between traction in a straight line (ie drag racing) & traction on a corner exit.

When both springs are in equal amounts of compression the anti roll bar has ZERO effect. It does nothing.

It is only when the left & right springs are in different amounts of compression (Or rebound) that the anti roll bar works. What it does is transfer load from the unladen side to the laden side (ie if you are turning right it moves load from the right hand side tyres to the left hand side). The effect of this is to diminish the amount of grip the car has. However, there are many other factors determining tyre grip, not least camber angles & tyre temps. This is where the anti roll bars help generate grip.

If you ever get to see a front wheel drive hatch on a circuit (eg a VW Golf is a classic example) you will often see that they run sufficiently stiff rear anti roll bars to completely pick up the inside rear tyre.

If you ever get to see a front wheel drive hatch on a circuit (eg a VW Golf is a classic example) you will often see that they run sufficiently stiff rear anti roll bars to completely pick up the inside rear tyre.

could you elaborate more on why picking up the side rear tyre is a good thing?

i was talking to another guy that sets up race cars (believes roll should be controlled with low speed bump) and he was telling me this is why swaybars are bad, cos under enough load the inside wheel lifts up. but if cornering load is that big and the inside wheel was still on the ground, there would be bugger all normal force on it to create friction, right?

thoughts?

Edited by salad

At the end of the day, we drive road cars which arent sufficiently rigid enough to really stress too much.

Everything with silly cars is a compromise. You can do it with it springs and shocks, but then the car will have trouble riding the different frequency road surfaces. On smooth stuff it may be ok. So comes bcak to what you want to compromise.

Im running pretty soft suspension with big bars, and im happy with it. Be interesting in the next few weeks when some friends drive it in anger and see what they think

In and of itself, it isn't. But you have to separate balance (ie understeer/oversteer) from overall grip. Front wheel drive cars (& GT-R's for that matter) have a poor weight distribution with the front end carrying 60% of the weight. Now all else being equal (it isn't, but lets pretend) the front tyres won't generate as much grip as the rears. So you need to kill some rear grip to balance the car. In the case of a front wheel drive car as long as you have sufficient rear grip who really cares if the inside rear is off the ground? It isn't doing anything after all....

The problem with the GT-R is that running a stiff anti roll bar, while it is fine for balance (Needed in fact) it hurts your traction off the corner because you can then buzz the inside rear on power down.

As for transient (ie damper) issues - these are different from steady state spring (& rollbar) issues. But you mate is right - low speed bump does have an effect, particularly on turn in.

Woah very interesting and complicated read.

At the end of it all, I still dont know whether to fit the sway bars or not given the current setup in my GTT.

My spring rates are 5kg front 4kg rear (Tein Super Streets set almost full soft), alignment done to SK's specs. Tyres are Falken FK451's which are pretty good. I have 24mm front and 20mm rear adjustable bars sitting in the garage.

Requirements: better handling overall, same-ish comfort and driveability on bad roads, dont want to lose it easily in the wet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...