Jump to content
SAU Community

Personal Breatho


gts-t 4 life
 Share

Recommended Posts

Most males are able to digest or dispose of alcohol at a rate of usually 1 standard drink per hour, or old saying for men 2 standards in first hour and 1 standard every hour after that usually keeps you under .05, to work things out better, if you have roughly on a good round 8-10 jimmy cans at i think 1.9 standards your looking at 17 to 20 hours Minimum to dispose of all alcohol from your blood stream, thats from the moment you start drinking, It is also on a base that if you eat usually helps but is still within your system, 1 standard drink is usually the ammount that a persons liver can process, that is a person that is healthy and has a healthy liver of course, but as above if you going to drink DONT drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

will it still be on ya breath 20 hours later or just in ya blood stream

short answer : yes

long answer:

its in your breath because its in your bloodstream (lots of blood flows through your lungs otherwise you'd die for several reasons), but the residue alcohol in your mouth will evaporate after you take your last swig, best guess this would take no more than 30min :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would it be fair to say the fatter or bigger you are the more alchol it takes to read lets say 0.05% because you have more blood in your system than thinner smaller people.

So in short if you give me 2 coronas in an hour i might read about 0.05%

but

If you give say squizz or mud 2 coronas in an hour he might read about 0.07%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep spot on... more body mass (more blood= more 'fluid' to act as a solvent) means that for a given dose of something it will be diluted to a greater amount. Also for meds your fat percentage is very important as drugs can be retained in fatty tissue, but this wouldn't apply to alcohol i'm sure.

Real world example - if col and a old lady each consumed a yard glass how many of them would it take to change a lightbulb? if you found that funny you are a skinny bastard that has had 1 beer with dinner and are intoxicated..

the end :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my $0.02....

i had a $30 one from ebay. It would work and read pretty close to what we expected ONLY if you blew across the sensor the right way. You had to blow through the plastic slits at the right angle, otherwise it'd read nothing. It'd either read accurate, or fully OK to drive.

Then one day i opened it up to see how it worked. I saw a button on the inside that i hadn't seen before. I pushed it and it has never worked since :( I think it was the "callibrate" button and it lost its factory callibration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure if the weight thing is strictly true..

It's only a rough guide the 'x drinks in x hours thing', and will vary person to person - it's not just weight, but that may be a factor, amongst many others (diet, metabolism, fitness levels, how much alcohol you usually drink, cultural, etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

get one of those breathalyser immobilisers

you have to blow under 0.05 or your car wont start :(

edit: and btw the weight thing doesn't do shit for alcohol, it's the quality of your liver and how well it metabolises alcohol, and if anything else is distracting it at that current point in time (meds, drugs, certain foods/liquids)

i'm on some funky prescription meds, and from those i can tell you that it all comes down to the liver =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one of the Alcohawk Pro Breathalysers, it is extremely accurate as far as personal breathalysers go. Its actually rated better than the Australian Police ones. It is still only a guide though, any reading won't mean shit if you get pulled up and test over.

http://www.halifaxandgeneral.com.au/products.php?id=5000

Halifax and General will also recalibrate them (recommended every 6 months)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • According to @acsplit apparently the forum is being migrated from one server to another so should be back up and running once the migration is done.
    • I thought I would share a few fun facts about Haltech products that I've learnt with their use that they don't share on their website. Haltech GPS speed - Extremely slow to react. It's fine for puttering around but I have no idea what speed I'm driving when in WOT due to the slow response time. This was always going to be temporary as I need mechanical wheel speed for eventual torque management, but it has just been bumped up a priority or two as it's a nuisance.  Haltech I/O Expander - You often hear the response time is slow due to canbus comms, but I could not find concrete evidence and Haltech makes no mention of it. We'll now I have it. I mentioned in an earlier post that I thought my WMI mechanical pressure switch was causing a delayed response from my AEM WMI Controller to my ECU. My WMI begins to operate at 11psi, but my ECU was only getting an "On" signal around 19psi. After removing the pressure switch, there was no change. Luckily I connected my WMI Controller directly to the ECU the morning of my Dyno tune and there was a large improvement. I get the "On" signal around 13-14psi now. These remote IO boxes should be marketed for only non-critical I/O.  
    • Best option. A cheaper option is a Xtreme Twin Plate, Organic Sprung Centre
    • Transmission synchros feel pretty bad at this point in my car and sometimes the clutch feels like it has an inconsistent engagement point in the pedal travel. I figure if I'm going to swap in a new transmission I may as well also put in a new clutch. Obvious candidates are ATS's pull-type twin plate carbon clutch, Nismo Super Coppermix Twin, or some organic clutch option I haven't figured out yet. I have searched this stuff to death at this point and still don't feel all that confident in making a decision. Target power is not much. ~330 kW at the wheels max. I ballpark the torque spec at 600 N-m. The stock clutch feels a little light so a little heavier is ok but I would say no more than 15-20% additional pedal effort. For some reason most clutch manufacturers want to keep this stuff a secret but the Coppermix Twin is 950 kg clamp load so I figure it can't be too much heavier than stock. The hang-up I have is some people mentioning that the clutch is very grabby which sounds like a pain. The stock clutch is almost too easy to modulate so I don't mind if it requires more precision than that but I don't want to deal with something that feels like I'm getting rear-ended at every traffic light. Also I see some mention of the release bearing carrier sizing requiring some work which sounds like something that might complicate installation? It would be good to know exactly what is needed here for a 1995 R33 GTR. The ATS clutch is supposedly the best but I've seen some complaints that they wear out easily and also slip when cold. I don't know how much of that is true but the cost is also huge compared to even the Nismo Coppermix twin plate. It's also unsprung which normally I would reject immediately but supposedly carbon clutches don't need it. The higher clamp load at 1300 kg is also a little concerning but to me more clamp load seems like it inevitably means more pedal effort and also more strain on the engine crank thrust bearings.  This is a street car and despite being a weekend car I seem to spend a lot of time crawling in severe traffic congestion with it anyways so I will gladly pay to have something that is easy to drive on and will hold the power with no unexpected headaches. I really don't want to do a clutch twice.
×
×
  • Create New...