Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If there are two cars, one running 15 psi, and the other running 20psi. You would expect the car running the higher boost to create more torque.

But, whilst they are still spooling and ramping up to their set boost level, would you expect the car running more boost to make more power even though its yet to physically run any higher boost then the other car?

I suspect wastegate creep could account for more mid of the car running higher boost, as it is less likely to crack as early?

Anyone with any real experience or dyno print outs showing an increase in mid range from one run to the other, only thing beign changed being boost?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/142846-silly-boost-question/
Share on other sites

If the ext gate is correctly setup.

It wont crack before it should.

15psi or 20psi, the gate should only open once the boost has reached that level. If there is creep, then the spring is too soft and so on.

Im not too sure thats true Ash, could be, but the physics doesnt suggets it.

Anyway, its not really the question. If on your old setup, if you ran 16psi, then 22psi, did you find your torque curve was fatter even when the thing was ramping onto boost through the 5-15psi range?

Why dont they? Would love to know how its different.

I went from a 7psi spring/17psi, and you could clearly see it was creeping, you could hear it cracking open aswell ever so slightly before target boost was reached

Soon as we went to 14psi spring/17psi, you could see it on the dyno fully loaded it wouldnt open till it hit the 17.

Getting a spring as close/spot on to the gate it shouldnt let it open before.

How can it? Should the spring not hold. It is related, you brought it up ;)

I can say i ever checked the 5-15 range to be honest.

Nor did i ask about it. I cant say i noticed a difference before hand, it was only after it was on boost as the thing really wokeup using 24psi as opposed to 17psi.

Felt a lot more lively without even using the extra timing and so on.

Has anyone got dyno sheets of their engine showing torque cruve at different boost levels?

Forget wastegates...i hear what you are saying ...but take a car and run it at 15psi. The run it again at 22psi.

Would you expect their to be a difference in torque range while they are ramping up to 15psi? Sure when you do the 2nd run up to 22psi it will make more power, but will the curve be moved to the left at all?

I wouldnt expect it to, but im a bit confused by some results i saw the other night if a few cars on the dyno. Two same engins, but different turbos. Both makign boost at the same rpm , the boost curves look the same. Only the car running higher boost is making more power earlier. Ok so they run different turbos so thats to be expected. Only the car running higher boost is makign a lot more torque a few humdred rpm earlier????

Sounds like different setups... even though the motor is the same, a cam, timing, air intake temp, spark, fuel.. they should all make torque differences.

I'd imagine, as Nismoid suggests, that if I dyno'd my car at 7, and then at 10, the curve should be exactly the same up until the boost goes over 7, at which point the first run would have the wastegate open and stop the car from really making any more boost. 2nd run at 10psi would see more boost, and the actuator open later, as more pressure is built up.

The leadup to the wastegate opening shouldn't be any different. The ECU/car doesn't know when the boost is going to be dumped out the wastegate, so nothing else should change before that happens.

Still.. that's what i'd assume from theory, and i'm keen to see any results! (obviously same car, same day, same setup would be the only fair test)

EDIT: hmm... so... if that was confirmed, then possibly the wastegate actuator spring could be a culprit? A guy running more boost may have put in a harder spring, to better match the desired boost pressure, and therefore it holds boost better. Another bloke runs his standard setup on higher boost, and perhaps some of the pressure is lost through the wastegate because it's not holding as well as a stiffer spring. That's the only thing that I can think of that might explain it.

Edited by RANDY

if it is the same car with the same turbo and you change the boost from 15psi to 20psi (using a wastegate set at those 2 pressures) then there will be no power difference untill the boost goes above 15psi when you have the boost wound up. from the moment the second setup goes above 15psi the power and torque will change. below that the will be 100% the same.

if it is 2 different turbos then it comes down the compressor properties.

Only the car running higher boost is making more power earlier. Ok so they run different turbos so thats to be expected. Only the car running higher boost is makign a lot more torque a few humdred rpm earlier????

I'm not sure what the issue is, more power eariler..then why are u suprised it makes more torque earlier considering they related.

no 2 setup are 100% the same, don’t forget. engine condition, heat, wear exhaust ect etc, everything matters. Even 2 identical cars 1 may be something slightly diffrent causing different outcomes.

As said

"if it is the same car with the same turbo and you change the boost from 15psi to 20psi (using a wastegates set at those 2 pressures) then there will be no power difference until the boost goes above 15psi when you have the boost wound up. from the moment the second setup goes above 15psi the power and torque will change. below that the will be 100% the same. if it is 2 different turbos then it comes down the compressor properties."

is all there is to it, and don’t forget dynos aren’t 100% accurate and are effected my environmental conditions. Just like cars are with heatsoak

..a dirty air filter can be a factor .. if you get what im saying.

Yeh, i appreciate ppl saying they are different engines...but what im sayign is FATGTS-R (from memory) made a lot more mid range and torque when he ran a higher boost level then when he ran lower boost.

Driving my car at the moment on 21psi, im nowhere near hitting or hearing the gate and its driving with more midrange. The comparisonbs between two different motors are pretty inconclusive, you are right. But it just seems that these two particular expamples of RB20s when running pretty high boost...well it seems to wake up the mid range???

Then again if FATGTS-R reads this, he may be able to comment on whether i understand correctly an old post of his

i cant see any logical reason why car 1 running 10psi and car 2 running 15 psi would make more torque earlier in the rev range. its just manifold pressure, forcing more air into the engine. i see no reason why it would force it to make more torque ealier (if thats what you are expecting). once car 2 reaches the more boost pressure then sure, more torque is possible.

thats assuming car 2's compressor wheel is still in its efficency island as well

Its a shame ive got a 1 bar spring in the wastegate as im getting a tune done in the morning. If i had a 7 psi spring i could get two different boost printouts done, and no im not gonna put 20psi into a na motor, well not yet anyway lol.

In theory i dont think it should make any more torque untill it sees more boost but i do think by seat of the pants feeling they do pull harder down low for some reason on higher boost

just my experience to add, no answers here.

my car seems to feel like it has more torque when im running higher boost.

ie: having my controller set to 1.36bar as opposed to 1.05 bar, then whilst general street driving and not winding it out, it seems to pull harder even though im not hitting its max setting

(hitting around 0.7 - 1.0 bar thru the gear changes for example)

i'd be interested to know if this is caused by a fault like the wastegate actuator, as suggested, cos my turbo is in for a rebuild at the moment.

Edited by iz32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...