Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have been looking into 2.8L kits and it seems to be slightly slim for choices.

The tomei kit is not a full counter so i have ruled that out.

The hks step 3 is the only one that i am highly considering for 2.8's

Now i had a question as to how would the Nismo 2.8 gt crank hold up in a high hp application.

I have been reading about a company who ran the stock crank in a 1000hp car and did well over 44 dyno pulls and numerous 1/4 mile runs. This makes me think that the 2.8 gt crank would be as strong as or stonger but i have not seen it being used.

I have also been looking at the trust 2.7 full counter kit and the tomei 2.7 full counter.

I will not go OS 3L :D

Any help would be great.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143513-28-options/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

unless you want massive power then you are setting your criteria far too high. a step 1 or 2 HKS kit will hold plenty of power. It's only if you want the massive revs and massive power that you need even consider the step 3 kit. The tomei 2.8 kit is also fine for most hard core street/strip cars. In japan at the moment it seems the HKS kit has the slight edge on popularity though. They are both around the same price, and in my eyes good value.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143513-28-options/#findComment-2677163
Share on other sites

as stated what is the purpose of the engine?!

stock crank and rods can handle 800hp (while given not indefinitly!), so any of the aftermarket cranks you mention should be fine. the step 2 HKS kit is ~800 rated, and as this rating is very much more than likely conservative, im sure if your building a street car that it will handle 1000.

Either way it sounds like fun, my HKS step 2 is nearly done!

Edited by SLY33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143513-28-options/#findComment-2677301
Share on other sites

I guess i should have worded that better my bad.

I am wondering what other kits are available and if anyone knows wha tthe nismo 2.8l gt crank can take power wise.

Crower's 2.9l will be out shortly in the new year.

I don't know if Apexi is still producing the 2.9L

The build will be tracked at around 1200 bhp and ran around 800bhp most of the time.

Edited by icydude
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143513-28-options/#findComment-2677948
Share on other sites

For the money.....

Would it not be wiser to spend it on a 3L bottom end , a set of oversized forged pistons,cams and

a decent head port?

I Find these kits to expensive.

What modes do you have and what power figures are you looking at?

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143513-28-options/#findComment-2679177
Share on other sites

The problem with the RB30 blocks is that unless you spend big dollars on a decent crank, they will explode at around 7500rpm.. my mate has a twinturbo twincam RB30 which he is pulling out to replace with a HKS Rb26/28 stroker.. so he can rev it to 10000rpm :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143513-28-options/#findComment-2681179
Share on other sites

The problem with the RB30 blocks is that unless you spend big dollars on a decent crank, they will explode at around 7500rpm.. my mate has a twinturbo twincam RB30 which he is pulling out to replace with a HKS Rb26/28 stroker.. so he can rev it to 10000rpm :D

u dont need to rev them (rb30) out to make big power, as they make the same power as other kits at lower rpm. plus u cant go expecting to rev a standard crank to nything near 10k like u could do with say a HKS, caus the HKS is full counter-forged, its like comparing apples and oranges

my rb30 is pretty much finished, im just waiting on the sump and my adapter plate to be ready (i've made my own adapter plate)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143513-28-options/#findComment-2681274
Share on other sites

to make big torque or big power? as horsepower is a function of torque and revs, then yes more revs = more power..

and what exactly is "counter-forged"? do you mean they are forged and counter-balanced?

torque wins races, horsepower sells cars :wave:...no1 wants a big power street driven car that when they smack the go pedal they gotta wait 6000rpm to go anywhere

and yes, i was being lazy :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143513-28-options/#findComment-2681410
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...