Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

:) Now you should go in a car with 2860R's and tell us what you think...

Yes I changed from T517Z's to 2860R's..

Yes I have MUCH more response..

The T517Z's were good for top end, more suited to drag racing, will make good peak power...

No I wouldn't change them for anything.....

No I wouldn't buy HKS items, the price of the Garretts are too good refuse...

:/

Ive been in the same gtr and driven it with the 517's....havent seen the 2860R's in a gtr infromt of me so havent had a chance to see in in action, having said that cant knock the 517's as they seemed to come on nice and early for what they are. I dont doubt they arent as responvice to the 2860, it from the trim size described they would easily.

I dont wanna be made out like a jackass so I thought id have to give another of my 2cents.

Ash, as stated you have been in a car with 2860's thats fine, theres a bit of a difference between sitting in a passenger seat and driving a car, so I cant see why you disregard the 517's so fast...I guess it all depends how you drive the car aswell....

each to their own....anyone wanna give me a ride in a 2860 powered GTR? So I can see what all the fuss and a fuedin is about? :)

peace

Jez

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ive been in the same gtr and driven it with the 517's....havent seen the 2860R's in a gtr infromt of me so havent had a chance to see in in action, having said that cant knock the 517's as they seemed to come on nice and early for what they are. I dont doubt they arent as responvice to the 2860, it from the trim size described they would easily.

I dont wanna be made out like a jackass so I thought id have to give another of my 2cents.

Ash, as stated you have been in a car with 2860's thats fine, theres a bit of a difference between sitting in a passenger seat and driving a car, so I cant see why you disregard the 517's so fast...I guess it all depends how you drive the car aswell....

each to their own....anyone wanna give me a ride in a 2860 powered GTR? So I can see what all the fuss and a fuedin is about? :/

peace

Jez

I have dyno sheets to prove the response differences, will try and dig them up...

JAGR33 which version 2860r did u buy -7 or -5?ive just purchased the -5 and im very interested to see your dyno results.

ill be hoping to make 300awkw with pfc,044,tomei 600cc,cooler,full 3inch zorst etc etc

JAGR33 which version 2860r did u buy -7 or -5?ive just purchased the -5 and im very interested to see your dyno results.

ill be hoping to make 300awkw with pfc,044,tomei 600cc,cooler,full 3inch zorst etc etc

I have the -5's, you should achieve your desired power target, it all depends on whether its standard motor or rebuilt, cams, boost level etc....

Your exhaust and injectors will restrict you a little....

I'm at around 350rwkws on 20psi...

I have the -5's, you should achieve your desired power target, it all depends on whether its standard motor or rebuilt, cams, boost level etc....

Your exhaust and injectors will restrict you a little....

I'm at around 350rwkws on 20psi...

600cc should see 300awkw,and as far as exhaust i just purchased a 3 1/4 inch full titanium,and ill have stainless dumps and fronts so should be fine id say..

stock motor but will have cam gears...

a mate i no has the same setup but with -7 making 300awkw and he has 550cc injectors...

i wouldn't chose either. for low mount turbos for me it's either HKS GT-SS, HKS GT-2530 or Nissan R34 GTR N1 depending on exactly want you want from the car.

The GT28060R-5's are nearly identical to the HKS GT2530's.

I would personally go the Garrett if i were comparing the two.

Listed are the HKS GTSS specs also which uses the same turbine as the GT2530's but slightly smaller compressor wheel although the GT2530's much like the GT2860R's turbines are usually clipped to increase exhaust flow.

Compressor

HKS GT2530

Trim :63

A/R :0.60

Ind :47.7mm

Exd :60.1mm

Garrett GT2860R-5

Trim :62

A/R :0.60

Ind :47.2mm

Exd :60.0mm

Turbine

HKS GT2530

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Exd :47.0mm

Garrett GT2860R-5

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Compressor

HKS GTSS

Trim :60

A/R :0.60

Ind :46.6mm

Exd :60.1mm

Turbine

HKS GTSS

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Exd :47.0mm

The GT28060R-5's are nearly identical to the HKS GT2530's.

I would personally go the Garrett if i were comparing the two.

Listed are the HKS GTSS specs also which uses the same turbine as the GT2530's but slightly smaller compressor wheel although the GT2530's much like the GT2860R's turbines are usually clipped to increase exhaust flow.

Compressor

HKS GT2530

Trim :63

A/R :0.60

Ind :47.7mm

Exd :60.1mm

Garrett GT2860R-5

Trim :62

A/R :0.60

Ind :47.2mm

Exd :60.0mm

Turbine

HKS GT2530

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Exd :47.0mm

Garrett GT2860R-5

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Compressor

HKS GTSS

Trim :60

A/R :0.60

Ind :46.6mm

Exd :60.1mm

Turbine

HKS GTSS

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Exd :47.0mm

yeh i went the -5 as cheaper option th getting hks 2530 or even the gt-ss

OK I have found the graphs, but my scanner is playing up so here's a rough comparison:

The dyno runs were done on a dyno dynamics dyno in 4th gear (R33 GTR) and in the same mode (non-shootout)..

At 95km/h, the T517Z's were making 85kw, the 2860R's 95kw

At 112km/h, 105kw compared to 140kw

At 128km/h, 155kw compared to 240kw :)

At 145km/h, 255kw compared to 305kw

At 160km/h, 330kw compared to 325kw

At 178km/h, 360kw compared to 350kw

At 194km/h, 365kw compared to 358kw

These figures were taken from a dyno reading AT THE REAR WHEELS.

The same dyno was used.

The car essentially had the same components, same exhaust, cams, ecu etc...

As you can see the T517Z's were no match down low and midrange of the 2860R's is phenomenal..

Though when the T517Z's finally do wake up, they make quite good power..

I prefer higher average power than higher top end power...

Others might like the waiting and then big rush of the turbo spooling at full boost.

The 2860R's have a more progressive power delivery..

From the graph its evident which are more responsive...

Hope that helps...

P.S once the scanner is sorted, I'll post up the graphs...

Just a note...

The GT-SS specs you listed are in fact SR20 Gt-SS specs..

The GTR specific Gt-SS are quite a bit smaller ...much more like R34 N1 or -7 Garretts.

cheers,

Ben

The GT28060R-5's are nearly identical to the HKS GT2530's.

I would personally go the Garrett if i were comparing the two.

Listed are the HKS GTSS specs also which uses the same turbine as the GT2530's but slightly smaller compressor wheel although the GT2530's much like the GT2860R's turbines are usually clipped to increase exhaust flow.

Compressor

HKS GT2530

Trim :63

A/R :0.60

Ind :47.7mm

Exd :60.1mm

Garrett GT2860R-5

Trim :62

A/R :0.60

Ind :47.2mm

Exd :60.0mm

Turbine

HKS GT2530

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Exd :47.0mm

Garrett GT2860R-5

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Compressor

HKS GTSS

Trim :60

A/R :0.60

Ind :46.6mm

Exd :60.1mm

Turbine

HKS GTSS

Trim :76

A/R :0.64

Major :53.8mm

Exd :47.0mm

Too many numbers everyday.

Both are still rated at 320ps

GTR

HKS GTSS

Trim :56

A/R :0.60

Ind :44.46mm

Exd :59.41mm

Turbine

HKS GTSS

Trim :62

A/R :0.64

Major :53.85mm

Exd :42.40mm

Still Garrett is the better all round option for cost-power

Hey all,

I own the GTR Wheezy drove. I cant agree more with him in the responsive sense. The T517z(atleast for me) is a smooth turbo. I have no problems driving it on the street and track. My experience from this turbo set up has shown me that its perfect if you want various uses from the car.

List of mods...... Twin trust T517z's

Greddy combined front/dump

Blitz Nur spec cat back

Bltz twin pod filters

Greddy profec B boost controller

OS Geikin twin plate clutch

Results from these mods are response with power right through rev range. Havent lost a street drag to date :) Haha, just joking

Catch!!

Well I have already made the choice and gone for the GT2860-5.

Done the drive thing on a car here in the west with -5 well set up and it was very impressive to say the least.

At the price they seem hard to beat.

With any luck I can do a before and after sometime in the new year and post the results.

Reliability mods going in as well - PFC + EBC, timing belt, sump baffle, oil cooler + relocation kit, 700cc inj, adj cam wheels, new custom dumps/front pipes, high flow cat, JB clutch and new gaskets (thanks to a leaking plenum that started this process in the first place). By by $$$$$. :laugh:

Excellent comparison Jack.

No problems at all...with the cam gears and a sound engine.

sweet as,will wait and see what the motor does..fingers crossed

BOOSTD very interested in your finding. When will you be expecting to dyno?

will expect to be on the dyno during the first week in january. I'll run the same boost level and afr.

here's a link to my last dyno

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=60458

Edited by BOOSTD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...