Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

post-26406-1166983334.gif

Came across this why doing some research for my turbo upgrade.

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/turbo/...1rkai_graph.gif

BNR34

2.8L Bottom End

HKS T51R Kai BB

In Cam 290

Ex Cam 280

2 bar boost

150kw @ 3000rpm

450kw @ 4000rpm

660kw @ 6500rpm

That looks pretty impressive to me. What do you guys think? Could this be off an engine dyno not a chassis dyno?

Anyone have much experience with the Kai? They seem fairly popular in the Uk.

Merry Christmas

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/
Share on other sites

post-26406-1166983334.gif

Came across this why doing some research for my turbo upgrade.

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/turbo/...1rkai_graph.gif

BNR34

2.8L Bottom End

HKS T51R Kai BB

In Cam 290

Ex Cam 280

2 bar boost

150kw @ 3000rpm

450kw @ 4000rpm

660kw @ 6500rpm

That looks pretty impressive to me. What do you guys think? Could this be off an engine dyno not a chassis dyno?

Anyone have much experience with the Kai? They seem fairly popular in the Uk.

Merry Christmas

Yep, no problems - especially when you say it all quickly (i.e. full HKS 2.8L kit, STEP PRO cams and valve train to suit, FCON V, etc.).

Other "minor/incidentals" such as intercooler, plenum, injectors, fuel system, exhaust manifold, wastegate, full exhaust system, flywheel, multiplate clutch, upgraded gearbox etc are of course, a given.

How does the old saying go? "Speed is money - how fast do you want to go?"

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773203
Share on other sites

I would say it is definately RWKW or AWKW, but wouldn't expect thet sort of midrange, however i dont really think its a real dynograph.

But if it is real mighty good result dont ya say..

money=speed.....how true

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773215
Share on other sites

yeah it's a given that there have been plenty of bucks spent, its possible it was a HKS test car, so nothing has been left out.

But even so there are plenty of cars that have had ALOT of dollars spent on them in Oz but i've yet to see one with that sort of performance.

After thinking about even if that was an engine dyno and not a chassis dyno it is still every impressive.

To be honest i didnt think to would be possible to have 650kw at the top end with such a good mid range. I mean if that graph was a true indication of that engines performance you could set the rev limit for 4000 rpm for street driving and just open it up for drags.

I have had TO4Z at the top of my shopping list but after seeing this kai (if it could some how be confirmed) it goes to the top. It would be nice if HKS had a graph for the TO4Z on there site to compare, but i'd have to think the kai out performs it in every way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773690
Share on other sites

"...Yep, no problems - especially when you say it all quickly ...."

:D couldnt agree more...Gav you left out N1 or GT block, Mechanical LSDs front and back++++

Hey P.E. Dont believe everything you read from the component suppliers...not everyone dynos on a DD in shootout mode...oh and Merry Christmas

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773710
Share on other sites

:P

:D couldnt agree more...Gav you left out N1 or GT block, Mechanical LSDs front and back++++

Hey P.E. Dont believe everything you read from the component suppliers...not everyone dynos on a DD in shootout mode...oh and Merry Christmas

Hmm, the front and rear mechanical LSDs i already have made absolutely no difference to my turbo spool. I must have got the wrong brand!!!

agreed, don't believe every dyno from component suppliers, but i think everyone would agree that HKS under rate must of there gear on paper so why would they over rate componets on a dyno?

There other dyno charts on they're web site that look about right.

Even if it was out by 10%, still impressive.

Anyone have any useful feed back?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773755
Share on other sites

I agree. Does anyone have anymore info on this particular car?

The owner of the car is on the forums quite frequently and ill show him this thread as well :nyaanyaa:

It is a very tough car though and isnt just a show pony, its quite often out and about in Canberra :laugh:

P.S: It also makes a fair whack more than 500kw now in its every day street tune on pump fuel

Edited by Amaru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2775307
Share on other sites

My mechanic just bought one of the T51R SPL turbo's.. it's bloody huge! It's going on a 26 stroker, I'll get him to post results once it's built :P

Off the top of my head I think the T51R KAI is an 800hp turbo and the SPL is good for 1000hp O_o

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2775967
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...