Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I have always disliked Commodores for a number of reasons, including:

Lack of quality control/quality of materials

Lack of style

Lack of technology

Big boat type handling

Fact that nearly everyone owns one

Fact that they are used as taxis

Boofy Ausie bloke factor

The new commodore however seems to overcome point 2. Although there's not a huge amount of tech. in the way they produce their power, there sounds like theres a bit of tech. in the suspension.

Although a big heavy car will always be a big heavy car, from all reviews they tend to grip and handle pretty well. I know this did not start with the current commodore.

I now think they have a reasonable level of style. The GTS in my opion looks great. No longer looks like a heap of plastic and grey bits stuck on. All the GTS's i've seen are black and only black.

Not sure about quality or product, I have only read about one recall.

Although there are some shortcomings that haven't been overcome, this car has largely changed my view on Commodores and I can now can appreciate that if you want a big car that handles and is powerful, then the SS's and HSV GTS are reasonable value for money cars.

Never thought I would say that.

Has anyone else gone from dislike to like?

Cheers

Edited by Smurf
  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I want to know who out there thought the previous model, VT-VZ, was not large enough that they had to make the new one even bigger.

OK, so Holden had bigger plans in mind - mainly to export to the US, but the car is still bigger than most US sedans.

Parking in Sydney is hard enough, who wants to park something that big. I think the people at Holden are compensating for something else.

This model is supposed to far better quality than previous models (Although doesnt take much to improve :D )

I think the body has been styled to suite the upper models (Calais ->HSVs) cos the base models look strange with those flared wheel arches.

Those new HSV GTSs look shit hot IMO

So i reckon VE is much better model than previous

Edited by bogan_bob

Every time i see one i stop and think wow someones put a lot of effort into the Astra.... then it hits me, its actually a commodore.

I'll admit im a Ford fan, but i actually liked the commodores before this series, they were nice... but VE no thanks.

I want to know who out there thought the previous model, VT-VZ, was not large enough that they had to make the new one even bigger.

OK, so Holden had bigger plans in mind - mainly to export to the US, but the car is still bigger than most US sedans.

Parking in Sydney is hard enough, who wants to park something that big. I think the people at Holden are compensating for something else.

They're just taking into account that Australians and Americans are getting fatter and therefore need larger cars to fit in.

Commodores will always be commodores, rubbish. That commodore advertisement, Australia 1 Germany 0. What bullshit, Australia will never ever be as good as the Germans. My personal oppinion of the the new VE is that it looks cramped up and boxy, ugly.

I'd consider a HSV GTS or Senator if I needed a family car and could afford that price bracket, but I'd need an aftermarket bodykit. The lines for all the openings seem a bit too haphazard to my eye.

But with a 6.0L V8, MRC and massive brakes it should go OK for a big-ass sedan. And I generally like the new shape. It needs a bit of cleaning up, but its a nice base to work from.

That said, for the cost of a HSV GTS I could buy a Mitsubishi 380 for carrying people (I don't tow anything so the lack of V8 isn't a major issue) and have enough money to own a R33 GT-R for when I wanted to have some fun.

A couple of years ago they ran a HSV, V8 M5 and AMG E55 at the Nurburgring in the hands of an independent driver familiar with the track. The HSV was the quickest. I'd love to see the current V10 M5 and the new GTS MRC go head to head on the 'ring, and see if the HSV is still quicker.

VZ HSV Clubsport DTS - Only 0.5 seconds slower than an Evo/STI around Wakefield (and faster than a 350Z to boot)

That's performance car stuff right there.

I like the performance but I don't like the look and overall 'boatness' of the Commodore.

Basically I want the LS2 engine in a good sporty chassis

So basically I want a Corvette. :(

Of the new VEs, they are eye catching but they are indeed massive cars. I wouldn't mind one for a luxo-barge (eg the Calais) but in the end I'd probably spend my money on something a bit more unique like the Chrylser 300C

i not really a fan of the new shape, i agree that they clearly intended for it to suit the SS and Cluby type models

BUT!!!

this is completely hot and i would love to own one of these... custom interior of course

VE%20GTS%2001.JPG

:(

HSV... i just want THAT one

I'll take the GT3 RS on the front page :D

Thier nice cars, i'd look at one for a family car/daily driver... but they aren't sports cars, not in the same class as a GTR... GTR is made to go fast everywhere, VE is made to carry passengers, tow boats/caravans... which isn't a bad thing, still a nice car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 馃槩 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
  • Create New...