Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well ive basicly done the same

Ceramic coated and dry lubed Pistons

Ceramic coated valves

Ceramic coated combustion chamber

19inch davis craig thermo

Davis Craig electric water pump

Oil Cooler

3 pass desert cooler radiator

Are Intercooler

Cold air intake

Pre turbo Water injection

Pre Plenum Water injection

Jon

Gary - what fuel filter is available that wont restrict the new fuel lines that Im about to install ? As most seem to be smaller than the 9 mm fuel hose ?

Cheers

Mitsubishi V6 Magna, uses the same size dash fittings as the Bosch 044.

;) cheers :O

I updated my piston list from P221

Added a new p/n for a flat top piston from Arias and added compression ratios for the Arias pistons. Two are quite high for a turbo engine!

CP

All compression ratios are based on zero deck height, 1.2mm head gasket (7.13cc), RB25 @ 62.5cc, RB26 @ 64.5cc. They assure me they have done alot of work to make sure the facts are correct.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20

Flat top with no valve pockets

8.2:1 COMPRESSION RATIO with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20-9.0

6.0cc dome top,

9.0:1 COMPRESSION RATIO with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

*Care must be taken when using on RB26 with more than 11.5mm valve lift*

ARIAS

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332103

flat top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 8.4-8.6

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332104

10.6cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.2-9.4

Suit RB30/25

p/n= AP332105

13cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.5-9.8

WISECO

Skyline RB30 w/ DOHC RB25det cylinder head

1.260" compresion height, 66.5cc head chamber, Dish top -11.3cc, 7.0:1 compression ratio, 21mm pin, 1mm gasket thickness, 1mm deck clearance.

K577M865 86.5mm

K577M87 87.00mm

ACL

6MKRY9608 (VL turbo)

87mm, -4.5cc dished top, 1.261" compression height, 21mm pin,

Standard RB30ET pistons are 7.8:1, with RB25 head it is 7.1:1

These are bumped up to 8.5:1 so with the RB25 head it may give about 7.5:1??

Using http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html I came up with 8.5 for VLT (spot on) and 7.6 with twin cam head with 64cc chamber.

I entered: 2, 87, 85, 87, 1.2, 64cc, -4.5cc = 7.6:1

BUT these have a lower compression height than the CP/Arias and im sure it stuffs up my calculations but its late and im too tired to look at it any more... :(

anyone know ROUGHLY what comp ration i would expect with arais rb30 non-turbo pistons ( p/n AP340754 ) using the r33 rb25 head and rb30e bottom (block and head faced once), with 1.5mm head gasket. ive used comp calculaters but im sure im doin something wrong and it gives me wrong figures. any help would be greatly appreciated. im not sure how low/high piston sits but if we could go with zero clearance then i can make a better guess from there once its assembled.

also is there an accurate way of getting comp ratios once your engines up and running??

I rang Rocket Industries and they couldn't tell me much except they have a 5cc dome. Last sold a set in 2005 and would have to be special ordered.

The guy told me they were n/a pistons and wont work in a turbo.....but he said he doesn't know anything about RB30's (obviously) I told him you need to use a n/a type piston with the twin cam heads.

These 5cc dome pistons are in the middle of the flat top (8.5) and 10.6cc dome (9.3) other pistons and could possibly give 8.9 compression.

I rang Rocket Industries and they couldn't tell me much except they have a 5cc dome. Last sold a set in 2005 and would have to be special ordered.

The guy told me they were n/a pistons and wont work in a turbo.....but he said he doesn't know anything about RB30's (obviously) I told him you need to use a n/a type piston with the twin cam heads.

These 5cc dome pistons are in the middle of the flat top (8.5) and 10.6cc dome (9.3) other pistons and could possibly give 8.9 compression.

I put all the figures in the c/r calculator and it said 8.5:1

You cant work it out when the engine is assembled.

i think these 2 posts were in response to my questions??

if they are and your accurate then your a legend, coz a cr of about 8.5:1 is ok for my daily ~320rwkw

what do you guys think about using these n.a pistons forged pistons?? shouldnt be any problems?? what can i do to reduce and potential dramas?

your estimate of 8.5:1 was with zero deck clearance yee? so all i would need to do when assembling is check the clearance and deck/face accordingly??

thanx you been much assistance

easier said then done!

last tuner i went to blew my engine, the whole reason why im now doing the 30.

i believed him when he said it wasnt his fault (coz he was reputable) but when i

pulled the head off there was mass detonation on 5 pistons, and number 2 was dry

a nuns c**t and had a big hole in the side next to the ring lands

so ye tuning is scary.

does anyone have answers to my other questions??

I finally got my engine going and tuned yesterday, made 382rwkw on only 17.5psi boost. Had issues with boost control, if i tried to boost it over 17 psi it would just go crazy and make 25+psi, tried a few different ways using top and bottom port on the wastegate, but had same problem each way. Im currently running a 10psi spring, i will try the 15psi spring i have.

Any one know if using a 10 psi spring to try and run 20psi via and EBC can cause this??

post-11223-1174196522.jpgpost-11223-1174196588.jpg

Hi Andrew

Great effort :huh:

Whats your setup again ?

What wategate are you using?

I finally got my engine going and tuned yesterday, made 382rwkw on only 17.5psi boost. Had issues with boost control, if i tried to boost it over 17 psi it would just go crazy and make 25+psi, tried a few different ways using top and bottom port on the wastegate, but had same problem each way. Im currently running a 10psi spring, i will try the 15psi spring i have.

Any one know if using a 10 psi spring to try and run 20psi via and EBC can cause this??

post-11223-1174196522.jpgpost-11223-1174196588.jpg

I finally got my engine going and tuned yesterday, made 382rwkw on only 17.5psi boost. Had issues with boost control, if i tried to boost it over 17 psi it would just go crazy and make 25+psi, tried a few different ways using top and bottom port on the wastegate, but had same problem each way. Im currently running a 10psi spring, i will try the 15psi spring i have.

Any one know if using a 10 psi spring to try and run 20psi via and EBC can cause this??

post-11223-1174196522.jpgpost-11223-1174196588.jpg

nice work andrew, she'd be an animal and on such low boost.

Turbo is GT35/40 .82 rear, mounted on custom manifold i made, cams are 260deg.

I suspect the gate may be even too small, will try with the 15psi spring first.

post-11223-1174275955.jpgpost-11223-1174275352.jpg

I always try not to pick on peoples own creations, but I am sure that you are going to have ongoing problems with controlling boost with that exhaust manifold. The problem is the wastegate take off pipe/pipes is/are only relieving back pressure from 2 cylinders. The other 4 cylinders are hitting the turbine at an undiminished rate.

You really need to make the collector longer, so that the merged gases (all of them) have the chance to “escape” via the wastegate. Take cylinders #2 & #5 for example, there is simply no way that exhaust gas (pressure) can get from them and then out the wastegate pipe/pipes.

The merge collector (collectors if you are full split pulse) need to be at least 100 mm deep. Compared to around 20mm looking at the photos. Plus I would run the separate (2) wastegate pipes for at least 100 mm before merging them. Compared to around 15 mm looking at the photos.

:pirate: cheers :ninja:

Gary- The design is a fair compromise for room to make fit as i wanted to low mount the GT35. I wasnt too sure how well the wastegate pipes would work (again clearance limited) but it will run as low as 14-15psi boost. Im using a Blitz dual SBC to boost up to 17psi via the bottom port only, when i try and increase the boost more than this via the conrtller i get problems with unstable boost.

Im only running a 11psi spring in the gate, would this be the problem?? I have a 15psi spring to try.

hey all. got a question for all you out there. My oil feed restrictors arrived today from japan and the instructions were in japanese but they had pictured instructions as well so that helped. Thing is tho, where it tells me to install the restrictors on my block i got from the wreckers there are already fittings there that look identical. I dont understand how this is possible. Has anyone else come across this in the past? Should i trust the fittings already there?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...