Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have run an external gate for a while now and im happy with the boost curve , no falling off at high rpm. And also happy with the fact that the car makes good enough hp.

At the moment i have the gate to atmosphere. Which hasnt been a problem as i drive like an old lady and never load or boost the engine on the street. So in my case its hear no evil, ppl dont look for evil.

I have been warned though that this year i may be getting pinged at track days as the EPA are enforcing db requirements at the track. Now i dont care about losing the cool noise at WOT, my concern is will the increased gas flow in the exhaust cause back pressure problems...loss of power/boost problems etc?

Anyone had a plumbed back vs atmo experience on the same car, setup and tune? I know of two cars that lost power when they were plumbed back. Is that the norm?

I am running a high flow cat and HKS Hyper exhaust, which has two mufflers. Will it handle all those by-passed gases?

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Plumbed mine back... and the car sucked the wang.

I pulled the pipe out the next day :happy:

If your exhaust does not flow enough, you will have an issue.

If it does flow enough, then plumbing it back wont be a problem

I only had a 3" exhaust, not enough for 300rwkw

Was considering running a bike muffler off a TLR etc but its just more weight and agro that needs to be supported under the car...and also weight hanging off th tubular manifold . At the moment the weight of the wastegate is enough of a worry on the manifold...let alone throwing an exhaust system on it.

Was considering running a bike muffler off a TLR etc but its just more weight and agro that needs to be supported under the car...and also weight hanging off th tubular manifold . At the moment the weight of the wastegate is enough of a worry on the manifold...let alone throwing an exhaust system on it.

sounds fair

if i remember correctly i think it was SK that runs a support for the exhaust from the back of the motor

personally i will be setting up a support to run from either the block or the engine mount to load up the manifold so it ill not sink when red hot

any thoughts on running a seperate Cat and muffler on the WG pipe by itself ?

Ash, what were the effects of changing it to plumb back ??

Drive a stock turbo skyline.

Then put ane exhaust onto it.

Exactly the same, its the easiest way to describe it.

More power everywhere, better response etc etc

What brand of exhaust Nismoid?

Like i said, im hoping the HKS Hyper would be ok?!?!?!? It is a pretty quiet exhaust

Some Jap one :happy:

Needed a 3.5" at a minimum

i pliumbed mine back. and havent looked back. now i can actually here my motor and the all nice whissel from the 04 :happy:

11.3@122 with a bog stock bottom end seems to be enough proof for me that theres no power loss.

don't do it troy. it's like clipping the claws on a bird, or milking the fangs on a spider. it lets people know that despite being devestatingly handsome, you also have some nuts!

I say worry about getting pinged for noise if and when it happens. :huh:

Plumbed mine back... and the car sucked the wang.

I pulled the pipe out the next day :huh:

If your exhaust does not flow enough, you will have an issue.

If it does flow enough, then plumbing it back wont be a problem

I only had a 3" exhaust, not enough for 300rwkw

Now i dont doubt you know what your talking about... BUT

10.5 400rwkw+ plumb back screamer , 90mm exhaust with a centre muffler

...... ??? I pulled 300rwkw with my 3" plumbed back.. maybe this rule does not go for RB30DET's :angry:

Not saying it wont make the power, i did :huh:

The 3" system i had on my car, definately was a problem as the gate had to stay external

Then, my exhaust goes up and over the diff, where most R33's seem to be pretty straight and go under it.

Seen a couple of cars go from 3" to 3.5" and pickup some excellent results.

Nothing beats a flowing exhaust.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...