Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay guys. You know how most people say that the ideal twin turbo setup for the RB26 is the HKS 2530s? They say that is the turbo that will produce the most WHP as well as be the most responsive. Where you get the best bang for your buck as far as power and responsiveness goes?

Well I was wondering, what twin turbo would that be for the RB30? Of course with the extra liters you could go a bigger turbo and not worry as much about spoolup. So what would you guys think the ideal twin turbo setup would be for the RB30? One that produces say 750-800WHP and is still as responsive as possible? (relative of course)

-Sayajin

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156954-ideal-twin-turbos-for-the-rb30/
Share on other sites

If you want to stay with twin low mounts, I'm sure there's nothing wrong with using the 25/30s. Will still deliver penty of top end and will provide very good response as you have requested.

For even more top end, GT-RS terbs will suit the extra cubes of the RB30 very well (I'm very happy with the response of these on my 2.8L).

If you want to stay with twin low mounts, I'm sure there's nothing wrong with using the 25/30s. Will still deliver penty of top end and will provide very good response as you have requested.

For even more top end, GT-RS terbs will suit the extra cubes of the RB30 very well (I'm very happy with the response of these on my 2.8L).

Well I dont really care if they are low mount or not as I will be going with a custom TT manifold. I do want to keep the twins tho. I realize most people end up going single, but I personally just love the idea of twins.

When do you get boost on your 2.8L with the GT-RS turbos? I dont know if those will produce enough power for me however as I am looking for about 750WHP.

I am really leaning towards one of these 2 turbos. Garrett 3071 or Garrett 2560 -10.

The top one is the Garrett equivlent of the HKS 3070s. I know a few guys who are running these on RB30's. The other one produces about 15 less HP each, but may spool up a good bit faster. Unfortunately I am still learning how to read compressor maps so I cant tell for sure. Here are the maps on both turbos.

Here is the map for the 3071

GT3071R_700382_20_com_e.gif

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_700382_20.htm

Here is the 2560 -10

707160-10comp_e.gif

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

So based upon these maps, what do you guys think? Which one of these turbos would be better for 750WHP and responsiveness?

-Sayajin

Wow, no one has any ideas?

-Sayajin

Its because in a number of your threads now you has asked this.

And many people have told you now the same thing...

You want 800rwhp, you need GT-RS or similar.

cheers

Sorry man. I dont mean to ask redundant questions. The only reason I ask now is because all of my previous questions were regarding the 2.6L motor. Seeing as how it will be a 3.0L I would think there would be significant difference in turbo options.

That is the only reason I have asked the question again. I do apologize for any inconvenience.

I looked at the GT-RS turbos as were suggested initially, however it does not appear those will put out 750WHP. It seems they are good for about 650WHP or so. 800BHP or so. So I wanted to get opinions on something a bit larger.

Thanks.

-Sayajin

I really think you need to forget the numbers, and concentrate on the overall package. Realistically 600RWKW is more than can be used on a street car, as to make those power levels, the torque delivery characteristics will involve lag, and a skijump torque curve, whick IMO doesnt work well on a street(or circuit)car. Dont let AWD change what you are designing as in the real world with this sort of power exiting a corner and coming on boost mid corner i would alost prefer to just have 2 wheels break traction than 4 and be fighting torque steer at the same time. Just remember torque wins races and the throttle can controll big midrange torque, not so much rapid torque changes

Sorry man. I dont mean to ask redundant questions. The only reason I ask now is because all of my previous questions were regarding the 2.6L motor. Seeing as how it will be a 3.0L I would think there would be significant difference in turbo options.

That is the only reason I have asked the question again. I do apologize for any inconvenience.

I looked at the GT-RS turbos as were suggested initially, however it does not appear those will put out 750WHP. It seems they are good for about 650WHP or so. 800BHP or so. So I wanted to get opinions on something a bit larger.

Thanks.

-Sayajin

Your not going to have any traction with 600rwkw so i think your wanting response isnt going to matter a lot when your shredding tyres coming onto boost in 1-2-3-4 as you wont notice the response as you'll be more concerned about holding the car in a straight line rather than it 4 wheel sliding

All having a 3ltr is doing is shifting the power band to the left on a dyno sheet. It does not change what the turbos will output.

If your after that much, i would be getting a big single anyhow. Less mucking around.

Your problem is your trying to link Response & Big Power. They simply do not go together.

Your either going to build a very quick car with excellent average power or your going to build a dyno queen with massive numbers but no useable power band.

What do you want?

Humm.. once it is put into perspective it makes a lot more sense. I suppose that should have been something intuitively obvious! :wave:

I guess I have been hanging out with the Supra boys too much... Alas.

Also, I dont think that the 3.0L will change the turbo output. However it should reduce the amount of lag produced. So a turbo which is laggy on the 2.6L, may be perfect for the 3.0L.

Yea, I DEFINETLY want something that is usable on the street with a good power band. A dyno queen doesnt do anything for me. I could care less about unusable power.

With that said, I may be keeping my Twin 2530's after all. It makes a lot more sense once it is fully thought out. Sorry about that guys. Guess I was putting the cart before the horse. Based upon what I REALLY want to do, those may be ideal. I may have a look at the GT-RS's as those seem to have good results when used as a twin setup. However that may be the biggest I go...

Buster- I am sorry if you took offense to my sig. I meant no disrespect by it. I suppose you had to see the context of when it was used. It was actually quite funny. I suppose without knowing the whole story it may seem machoist. I apologize if it came off that way. Wasnt intended at all.

-Sayajin

Edited by Sayajin
Plenty of us women know and could probably help, but with a comment like that in your signature I'd rather choke on my own spew then help you

that one hit a neve! :huh:

P.S you know its true :wave:

Might be worth asking this question on GTROC, a few of the fellas have run GT-RS's on OSG RB30's.

Spec-wise the 707160-10's are very very similar to the GT-RS with the exception of the HKS GT-RS ported inlet.

Thanks. I spoke to a few of them and they all had good results with them

Quite a few of the big boys swear by the 3070s however. LOL. That is why I began to ask about them.

I think I will just go with the GT-RS however as it will get me what I REALLY want. A responsive and fast street machine.

-Sayajin

Thanks. I spoke to a few of them and they all had good results with them

Quite a few of the big boys swear by the 3070s however. LOL. That is why I began to ask about them.

I think I will just go with the GT-RS however as it will get me what I REALLY want. A responsive and fast street machine.

-Sayajin

Another good thing about the -10's are that they're a bolt on whereas the 3071's are going to need custom dump pipes although Rob could obviously knock those up for you.

Another good thing about the -10's are that they're a bolt on whereas the 3071's are going to need custom dump pipes although Rob could obviously knock those up for you.

Well between the -10s and the GT-RS, which would you prefer? I have already decided that the 3070s are unrealistic for what I hope to do with my car...

-Sayajin

Just my 2c worth .

Twins are always going to be a pain on that kind of car but not because there's anything really wrong with two hair dryers aside from cost/complexity/access/weight . If you want to play (experiment) with turbos its double trouble because of the cost and time involved . For example you get what you think is right but then decide say the turbine housing A/R is wrong - look at the work and cost involved in changing them and compare that to altering a single . Lots of things were changed to get parallel T28's on RB26's and the changes make the bits unique to that application . Generic bits like many singles have often cost less and are easy to sell on if you need to .

One big advantage I feel singles have is that incremental changes are easier to manage and if careful the result you aimed for is more easily achievable . Like in the above example going up a size in turbine housing with twins can be a larger jump than with a single .

Anyway with twins you have to decide high or low , integral or external gate and go from there . If they are T28 turbine housing based ie 2530 , 2871/GT-RS low and integral makes for a sort of factory like install . An RB30 should pull the state of tune down ~ 20% and give more off boost torque so how you go about keeping the turbos out of boost when you don't need them is the $64 question . If you are prepared to use external gate/s you could possibly get twin HKS GT2835 turbos with smaller compressor trim options and their GT30 based T28 flange turbine housings with small A/R's ie .61 or .73 to work but I hope your rich if you do this .

With singles something in the GT3582R - TO4Z range would work well .

Your money your call .

My 2c spent .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...