Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I know you said you wanted to be different... but WHY? What is the point of hacking up a perfectly engineered car like the 350Z?

There has been so much engineering gone into the 350Z with little details like CF drive shaft and you want to rip it all apart??

Also to the guy that said the RB might make the handling of the 350z worse is incorrect unless you have factual evidence or data to back that claim up.

weight. Clear and simple. It can be compensated for, but the handling won't be as good as if didn't have the extra kilos.

Anyway, I am curious - do you want the engine or the drivetrain MORE?

My 2c - from where I'm sitting, the murano package makes much more sense on paper. Should be easier to adapt, lighter engine, still 4wd, and cheaper.

Of course, if your heart is set on it... (like I have an R32 because thats what I wanted, despite being 2L with slow 4wd), achieve the dream.

Yeah. Long day at work.

Also to the guy that said the RB might make the handling of the 350z worse is incorrect unless you have factual evidence or data to back that claim up. The zele car had a very neutral feeling and the drivers that test it said they hoped the new GT-R had the same handling.

Yeah, that'd be me. I'd be incorrect because hanging a longer and heavier engine/diff/shafts etc over the front wheels that could weigh 30 to 100 kilos more than original (double and some for pounds champ) will have no effect on the handling...... Yep, I'd be wrong.

Edited by Marlin

I think it has been done many times before.

In fact just before the gtr35 launch top-secret had one to stick the finger up to Nissan.

They also slapped the 3.5 350Z Motor into a gtr with Turbo's

Shabs....you need to look at what you are after first...before you experiment with the

thought of it. :D

Or on the other hand get some custom panels to make a gtr look like a 350z :P

Sure this is cheaper

Also to the guy that said the RB might make the handling of the 350z worse is incorrect unless you have factual evidence or data to back that claim up. The zele car had a very neutral feeling and the drivers that test it said they hoped the new GT-R had the same handling.

The data is in the physics.

Replacing a compact all aluminium V6 with a long cast iron inline 6 pushes your centre of gravity forward. The 350Z already has a front biased chassis, so your car will be even more nose heavy. What do they say about the handling of front heavy cars again....?

The VQ35DE already sits half way between the strut towers, so the RB26 is going to have the vast majority of its mugh higher weight in front of your axle line. And that's before we include the weight of the intercooler, radiator front driveshafts, front LSD, etc which you've had to push forward to fit in front of this engine. There goes your polar moment of inertia.

Then there's the suspension, which has also been engineered with a specific weight balance in mind and you've just gone and f**ked about it. Its not just the spring and damper rates - the entire geometry will no longer suit. There goes your handling.

You keep crapping on about the Zele car. That was built for rallying, by a big engineering house with connections to Nissan and Nismo engineers in Japan. You've got a couple of apprentice wrench monkeys from a dealership on your side, and we all know how......qualified.....your average dealership mechanic is when it comes to working outside the company three-ring binder.

The Zele car is going to want to oversteer, because that's how they design rally cars to work. And with a surfeit of power, its not difficult to get it to power over. In the BMI video, it was quite taily, especially under power. And since Zele has Nissan factory support, they'd have access to guys who could reprogram the ATTESSA processor and calibrate it for the different weight and distribution of the new car.

And, to be quite honest, BMI isn't the be-all and end-all of technical knowledge. If you have a look at their various battles, they'll line up stock cars in multiple races and get multiple results. In some cases you can tell that they're "pulling" faster cars back, especially if the edition in question is about that vehicle.

I remember seeing one Tsukuba battle where the Supra TT beat the NSX, R33 GT-R, FD3S, etc. Another video, the NSX comes out on top. Of course, the GT-R can nevar lose in another vid. All on the same track, all dead stock.

If you're building a car for Hot Import Nights or some other car show, just import a GT-R wreck and use a big mallet to make the stuff fit. Of course it won't run, but when you've got the car raised up on a plinth so everyone can see your AWD driveshafts and the bonnet raised so they can see your chromed engine cover, everyone will know you're hectic. You could just connect the rear wheels up to the engine, so you can win the dyno comp "in RWD mode, for less drivetrain loss", and you'd have the perfect "different" dyno queen show pony.

My 2c - from where I'm sitting, the murano package makes much more sense on paper. Should be easier to adapt, lighter engine, still 4wd, and cheaper.

The G35x (which we don't get in Australia so few people here know about it) would be even easier still.

Its a V35 sedan (so same platform as the Z33, making transplanting a lot easier), but the engine is mounted longtitudinally like in the Z33 and has ATTESSA ET-S.

Its a shame I can't find the flash video of when the V35 came out on the Infiniti site. They show the different modes it works in. Off the line it uses a 25:75 F:R split for maximum traction, which shifts to 0:100 when cruising. In "winter mode", the power split is 50:50 off the line. The system, like the GT-R's ATTESSA, is also dynamic. It'll shift power front and rear depending on the grip, so it'll turn-in, power out, and hitting loose surfaces like feel like the GT-Rs we're accustomed to.

If I had big budget, I'd import a G35x and rip out its drivetrain for my Z33. I'd twin turbocharge the engine if it would physically fit, but otherwise I figure a VQ40DE out of a Pathfinder being inducted by a Stillen Roots-type supercharger would give me plenty of get up and go.

There are some subtle differences int he setup, im pretty sure the sump bolt pattern and everything else would be the same. Meaning the tranny n shit would more than likely bolt straight onto a VQ35DE in a 350z... mating it up to an RB26 is gonna be another thing entirely.

http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z10606/...no/default.aspx

http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z8321/N...0Z/default.aspx

^^^ 350z specs as opposed to the Murano... seem pretty similar to me.

Confirmed by wiki, same engine used in all the models specified some minor differences between the two, majority of parts are interchangeable :(

hmm... interesting.

thing with the subtle differences though, will lets say a murano VQ be as rev happy as one from a 350?

i would expect the murano VQ to be torquier since it'd be used as a tow vehicle/commuter. rather than a GT car.

or no?

hmm... interesting.

thing with the subtle differences though, will lets say a murano VQ be as rev happy as one from a 350?

i would expect the murano VQ to be torquier since it'd be used as a tow vehicle/commuter. rather than a GT car.

or no?

I dunno in terms of "specs" if thats the case, but having driven one, they are much the same as the Ford Territory VS the BA Falcon. Same engine, different car, almost identical feel.

Im looking at buying a 350z Track Edition as my next car, have test driven a few, and the guy next door has a Murano. Same sporty feel as the 350z obvioulsy in a much sort of bulkier car but its still very sporty and nippy if that makes sense. Same deal with the Territory and BA... seems like most manufacturers are going for that kind of combo these days, smaller AWD/4WD cars that feel the same to drive as normal commuters.

Now to make it AWD easily, cheaply and hassle free thats the million dollar question.

i spotted some grammatical errors there, should read:

free hassle? try cheaply, the million dollar conversion. easy! :laugh:

There project was completed in Oz here that is similar but the conversion was to a VL Commodore. So i dont think it will be that hard. Will be alot of mix-and-matching but once its all sorted. .. What a beast! :laugh: good luck with the project.

-Dale

yeah but theres more room around/in/under a VL, and the VL also would have more genetically in common with a skyline than a 350Z, ie: bolting up the engine and bits of the driveline would be very easy

I have fitted several different engines to the z33. Ive done the VQ40 from the pathfinder and also the 35th engine into my own maxima.

I have also done the RB26 into the Z33. Whilst getting the engine in is no big task getting it to work with the Z33 chassis and body systems is a nightmare. The vehicle I did now has fully opperational VDC with the RB26 and the CAN bus opperated perfectly besides the ECM section. The suspension needed a complete revamp as the entire car felt soggy on the track and was struggling to lap wakefield in 1.15's.

It now laps all day everyday in 1.06's and is pleasent to drive.

With the Attessa system being interfaced into the Z car you will be needing the entire ABS system from the GTR and ALOT of knowledge about the system. Your buddy may know how to fabricate but thats honestly the least of your problems come time to get it working properly.

In all honesty work with what you have OR buy a GTR. The end result will be so much better to drive.

There project was completed in Oz here that is similar but the conversion was to a VL Commodore. So i dont think it will be that hard. Will be alot of mix-and-matching but once its all sorted. .. What a beast! :D good luck with the project.

-Dale

... and that was completed by a very experienced engineering shop, and I recall reading that over 3000 man hours were required. (And a VL would likely be one of the easier vehicles to transplant)

That's a long time if you're doing it part-time :P

has everyone forgot abuot the top secret tt kit for 350z ??

300kw on 8psi which retains stock eng? man if you need awd I have NFI about hte murano but if its already designed for the vq go with that, bigger, newer tech mottor THAT ALREADY FITS and you get a VERY unique car that would probably handle a few high rpm luanches depending on murano drive train. You could probably use aftermarket items since your money pit seems bottomless anyways.

300kw's on 8psi with good tune on stock internals isnt something to sneeze @. admitedly the turbs in the front quaters doesnt look very practical for an every day street application but this doesnt sound like its much of streeter to begin with. talk about your cold air intakes though eh.

Ill have to find the mag I got this out of... prolly something real reputable like HPI or something... all i can remember was the turbo placement was ablsolute shit house but the 8psi @ 300 RWKW was something i didnt forget.

il post back latz with it if i remember

has everyone forgot abuot the top secret tt kit for 350z ??

300kw on 8psi which retains stock eng? man if you need awd I have NFI about hte murano but if its already designed for the vq go with that, bigger, newer tech mottor THAT ALREADY FITS and you get a VERY unique car that would probably handle a few high rpm luanches depending on murano drive train. You could probably use aftermarket items since your money pit seems bottomless anyways.

300kw's on 8psi with good tune on stock internals isnt something to sneeze @. admitedly the turbs in the front quaters doesnt look very practical for an every day street application but this doesnt sound like its much of streeter to begin with. talk about your cold air intakes though eh.

Ill have to find the mag I got this out of... prolly something real reputable like HPI or something... all i can remember was the turbo placement was ablsolute shit house but the 8psi @ 300 RWKW was something i didnt forget.

il post back latz with it if i remember

As all can tell...asks the questions and is no-where to be found :P .

I would love to drop the Q45 motor into my XTrail .Now this would be fun..does anyone know if it will fit. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...