Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys,

Is this camera kind of faulty?, was going up Stud towards knox and passed the intersection (FerntreeG rd) I knew there was a camera there so I went passed roughly 73~ on my speedo and the camera snapped me, im pretty sure its a 80km/h zone because all the signs say 80, so I was like wtf!

Anybody else have had any issues with this before.

I would sugest that you sit tight and wait for the speeding fine to arrive. Was any one else near you when you went past? Maybe while waiting for the fine to arrive get your speedo checked to be sure, and then don't pay and contest it. Thats what I would do. Best of luck.

I thought it was just a redlight camera?

Was doing right turn off stud onto ftg next to a truck which triggered the camera with his back tyres as light turned yellow.

Didnt know it was a speed camera? Maybe red arrow light turned on as you kept on driving straight and someone turning set it off?

I would sugest that you sit tight and wait for the speeding fine to arrive. Was any one else near you when you went past? Maybe while waiting for the fine to arrive get your speedo checked to be sure, and then don't pay and contest it. Thats what I would do. Best of luck.

if ur right on verification it will be thrown out. happens a fair bit. Also might not have been u.

might have been testing also, when I used ot test i would do it under the speed limit to get lots of images...lol pissed every1 off.

the cameras that got shot a couple of weeks ago on middleborough rd and the freeway - they are or were faulty. It flashed one of these guys car and he was doing around 50 apparently (most people slow down when they come to that camera)

that camera plays up all the time, ive been flashed twice and never got a ticket cause i wasnt doing anything wrong, and i've seen heaps of people get flashed when they arn't speeding or didnt run red light, it only gets you for speeding if the light is amber or red, but the camera even goes off when there is no-one going threw the intersection, i go past it like twice a day thats my experience, theres also a falty one on the corner of wantirna rd and maroondah hwy that goes off randomly too

that camera plays up all the time, ive been flashed twice and never got a ticket cause i wasnt doing anything wrong, and i've seen heaps of people get flashed when they arn't speeding or didnt run red light, it only gets you for speeding if the light is amber or red, but the camera even goes off when there is no-one going threw the intersection, i go past it like twice a day thats my experience, theres also a falty one on the corner of wantirna rd and maroondah hwy that goes off randomly too

its not uncommon cant say why...signed some stuff ages ago which still holds and this is a public forum.

I did a check, these are know problem sites. I doubt u will find any1 getting a ticket from these cameras...I couldn't actually see if these have gone live yet, dont have the access i used to :wacko:. never know...might not have.

Just becuase its installed doesn't mean its working and online.

Yeah I will wait, shouldnt be an issue due to the replies,

It was all green light all the way and it just flashed, I was on the most right lane going forward, and there was a van 2 car lengths behind on my left. But I do remember one car looking going pretty quick on the opposite direct crossingt the intersection as I was. Perhaps it triggered the camera?

pretty sure they have been doing maintenance on those cameras for a while now. i remember a few months ago i was turning right onto ftg rd from stud rd, and i got snapped going thru a green light doing like 25kms. so did every other driver.

ive seen them working on the cameras during the day, that was a few weeks ago tho. so maybe they arent right still...

I wouldn't worry about it, I drive through those lights every day and I see them flash all the time, mind you I haven't been flashed though. As said they are speed and red light, perhaps they were flashing someone else? Has happened to me before in other intersections and I never got any fines. They JUST did some work on them about a month or so ago so I'd say they are pretty on the ball.

I had a similiar experience with the speed camera infront of underworld gym on finders st. i was doing around 58(its 60 there), the light was amber and i got flashed. this was nearly two months ago so i am assuming that i didn't get the fine(i didn't bloody well deserve it anyway! i wasn't doing anything wrong!).

centre road in clayton is another faulty one, been through there, not speeding and got flashed, never got a ticket. mate drives down there all the time and says he gets flashed even at like 40km/h

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...