Jump to content
SAU Community

Fastest Skyline Stock

_MRR33
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

r32line Mentor

r32line

Posted
Posted (edited)
When it was new...

Yeah, just like my car did 0-100km/h in 6.5seconds when new.... It still did 14years later when i bought it, stock....!

And I assumed that the question was assuming the cars were as new, otherwise the comparison is very hard, but realistically, a well looked after/maintained R32 GTR should still do the factory acceleration times.

Edited by r32line
MANWHORE Grand Master

MANWHORE

Posted
Posted
i have to lol at the 33 GTST owner telling us 33 GTST is faster than the 34... sorry but it's just not true. 34 GTT is definately faster in a straight line, and elsewhere too. :(

I disagree with you on that one. What's a few kw difference? You're talking 20 kw. The r34 weighs 50kg more. 50kg on a circuit is slower than a few extra kw here and there.

kralster Veteran

kralster

Posted
Posted

Who cares though? Take each of them to a track and see what order it is.

It would go r32, 33, 34.

Hell a r34 GT-t has a stiffer chassis than any r33 gtr.

And i prefered my R34 GT-t over a 32 gtr.

But now my 750cc motorcycle does 0 - 100 in 2.8 seconds so what skyline can beat that?

satanic Grand Master

satanic

Posted
Posted
I disagree with you on that one. What's a few kw difference? You're talking 20 kw. The r34 weighs 50kg more. 50kg on a circuit is slower than a few extra kw here and there.

You are forgetting that it's not just about outright power... it's about many other things. The R34GTT has vast developments in the engine (hence being badged the NEO), the turbine system (bigger than R33), the suspension, the brakes etc etc. Even the HICAS system in the R34GTT is vastly different to that on the R33GTST.

I think if you compare the facts; the power difference is noticeable but more so the torque. The NEO's VVT system is much more developed than that on the R33GTST I'm afraid.

RESP33z Enthusiast

RESP33z

Posted
Posted

I think the specs show that the R32 GTR was the quickest 0-100 and in a straight line. But since when are skylines drag cars??

They are gran touring cars designed for the track therefore if you really want to compare which care is quicker - look at track times.

You will see that Nissan has more brains then to put out a newer model car, which costs more money but is slower than its predecessor.

So if you want to know which car is the quickest in standard form, I would go with the latest models of each...

We are however forgetting the V35 -- no one has mentioned that.

GorGasm Collaborator

GorGasm

Posted
Posted
People are not understanding, this is not an opinion, its about facts...which car is quicker...

The R32 GTR when sold did 0-100km/h in 4.7seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.0seconds!

That is quicker than an R33 GTR and an R34 GTR.... DISCUSSION OVER!!!

And dont start talking about N1's etc etc because we are just comparing the base GTR's and 32 is fastest, GAME OVER!

Its not all about straight line. Unless you're american.

pablo101 Mentor

pablo101

Posted
Posted

with the GTS (non turbos) its between the R33 and R34 as they are 2.5L while the R32 which is only 2.0, but knowing the R34 probably has better technology it would be fastest in straight line

with the GTR's ive been hearing everyone say its the R32, but again the R34 would have the better tecnology.

Betz Rising Star

Betz

Posted
Posted
0-100 1/4

R32 GTSt 6.5 14.8

R32 GTR 4.7 12.9

R33 GTSt 6.18 14.4

R33 GTR 5 13.1

R34 GTt 6.2 14.3

R34 GTR 4.9 12.9

+1

r32 GTR is the ledgend and an amazing achievment for a 1989 model car even by todays standards.

of course we all know the r34 is a better car overall, its just that it doesnt do anything the r32 already did 10 years earlier

/runs outside to hug r32 GTR

R34GT-t_07 Enthusiast

R34GT-t_07

Posted
Posted
Imo, the r34 gtr is the fastest

and the r33 gtst is the fastest. the r34 gtt offers negligible power gains over the r33 gtst, yet it adds on about 50 kg.

this just shows that u have no f**king clue what so ever the impruved power and aerodynamics of the 34 make it far supirior then a 33 especialy the neo factor vvti u should go drive a 34 then sit in a 33 and see the difference

GorGasm Collaborator

GorGasm

Posted
Posted

Its not concrete evidence but none of the other evidence in this thread is either but Best motoring compared stock examples of R32/33/34 against evo8 and sti9 and the track ranking was R34-STI-EVO-R33-R32. R32 got hammered big time on the track.

DVSGOD Apprentice

DVSGOD

Posted
Posted
People are not understanding, this is not an opinion, its about facts...which car is quicker...

The R32 GTR when sold did 0-100km/h in 4.7seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.0seconds!

That is quicker than an R33 GTR and an R34 GTR.... DISCUSSION OVER!!!

And dont start talking about N1's etc etc because we are just comparing the base GTR's and 32 is fastest, GAME OVER!

This is correct,r32 GTR is the fastest over the 1/4 and 0-100.

There is no opinion,it is fact.

Also when you start on down the mod rd a r34 gtr will need more out put from it to match a modded r32 GTR.

It does not matter that the r34 has more advanced steering/suspension/braking systems from factory.

Once you start to heavily modify a GTR you will upgrade the suspension , brakes etc etc,so a heavily Modded R32 will have all its handling amd braking taken care of.

Bank on at least extracting an extra 50kws from the same 2.6 engine for a r34 gtr to even to match a r32 neck to neck.That means more stress on the engine plus a far bigger budget.

To make it simple for you.

A 400kw atw r32 vs a 400kw atw r34 ,the r32 will be the faster car based on the drivers having the exact same skill leval.

Said r34 would need more power to compete.Dragging that extra lard around has its price you know :glare:

r32line Mentor

r32line

Posted
Posted
Its not concrete evidence but none of the other evidence in this thread is either but Best motoring compared stock examples of R32/33/34 against evo8 and sti9 and the track ranking was R34-STI-EVO-R33-R32. R32 got hammered big time on the track.

Track times bring in countless variables, the particular cars condition, the drivers skill, the tyres each car has and it goes on and on.

What is fact is that the R32 GTR when new did 0-100km/h in 4.7 seconds and 0-400m in 13.0 seconds... Neither the R33 or R34 GTR can match that time!

AND if you read the original post #1 in this thread it assumes the cars are as new from factory (which makes sense as its a level playing field)

gts-4 dreamer Mentor

gts-4 dreamer

Posted
Posted

I would like japanese figures on which is faster only cuase A, they have enough of a market spread that there will be enough numbers to show that the 32r is faster. for one you can buy a 32 an mod it a fair bit for the price of a 34....

pablo101 Mentor

pablo101

Posted
Posted

R32 has more potential, you can do ANYTHING with it, but it's fair to say that the R32 and R34 would be VERY close.

...R33 GTR not so much lol

I wonder if we can find a brand new R32 never driven against a R34??? gotta be someone out there that wants to prove this test for us

nizmo_freek Experienced

nizmo_freek

Posted
Posted
Track times bring in countless variables, the particular cars condition, the drivers skill, the tyres each car has and it goes on and on.

What is fact is that the R32 GTR when new did 0-100km/h in 4.7 seconds and 0-400m in 13.0 seconds... Neither the R33 or R34 GTR can match that time!

AND if you read the original post #1 in this thread it assumes the cars are as new from factory (which makes sense as its a level playing field)

Sorry but your wrong, there are best motoring videos (i hope you know what best motoring is) showing the r34 doing a 12.7 and also the r33 doing a 12.8 (or a 12.7, i will try and find the videos when i have some spare time) and both cars are completly stock.

They are lots of other best motoring videos with the r32,r33 and r34 racing together on the track, the r32 gets beaten by the r33 and r34 everytime.

As said above they are all great cars :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The king 2.0
      Nissan fuga 450gt android screen

      By The king 2.0 · Posted

      Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • MBS206
      NC MX5

      By MBS206 · Posted

      My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
    • dbm7
      Automatic Power Button Light Flashing

      By dbm7 · Posted

      Which solenoid? Why was it changed? Again, why was this done? ...well, these wear..but ultimately, why was it changed? Did you reset the idle voltage level after fitment? I'm just a tad confused ~ the flash code doesn't allude to these items being faulty, so in my mind the only reason to change these things, would be some drive-ability issue....and if that's the case, what was the problem? Those questions aside, check if the dropping resistor is OK ...should be 11~14 ohms (TCU doesn't throw a flash code for this) ~ also, these TCU designs have full time power (to keep fault code RAM alive), and I think that'll throw a logic code (as opposed to the 10 hardware codes), if that power is missing (or the ram has gone bad in the TCU, which you can check..but that's another story here perhaps).
    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Question for people who "know stuff" I am looking at doing the new intake like the one in the picture (the pictured is designed for the OEM TB and intake plenum), this design has the filter behind the front bar, but, the filter sits where the OEM duct heads into the front bar, and the standard aperture when the OEM ducting is removed allows the filter to pulled back out of the front bar into the engine bay for servicing, a simple blanking plate is used to seal the aperture behind the filter This will require a 45° silicone hose from the TB, like the alloy pipe that is currently there, to another 45° silicone hose to get a straight run to the aperture in the front bar Question: how will it effect the tune if I move the MAF about 100-150mm forward, the red is around where my MAF is currently, and the green would be where it would end up Like this This is the hole the filter goes through  Ends up like this LOL..Cheers    
    • Duncan
      R34 Plug Identification

      By Duncan · Posted

      Despite the level up question, actually I do know what that is....it is a pressure sender wire.  So check out around the oil filter for an oil pressure sender, or maybe fuel pressure near the filter or on the engine. Possibly but less likely coolant pressure sensor because they tend to be combined temp/pressure senders if you have one. Could also be brake pressure (in a brake line somewhere pre ABS) but maybe I'm the only one that has that on a skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...