Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When it was new...

Yeah, just like my car did 0-100km/h in 6.5seconds when new.... It still did 14years later when i bought it, stock....!

And I assumed that the question was assuming the cars were as new, otherwise the comparison is very hard, but realistically, a well looked after/maintained R32 GTR should still do the factory acceleration times.

Edited by r32line
i have to lol at the 33 GTST owner telling us 33 GTST is faster than the 34... sorry but it's just not true. 34 GTT is definately faster in a straight line, and elsewhere too. :(

I disagree with you on that one. What's a few kw difference? You're talking 20 kw. The r34 weighs 50kg more. 50kg on a circuit is slower than a few extra kw here and there.

Who cares though? Take each of them to a track and see what order it is.

It would go r32, 33, 34.

Hell a r34 GT-t has a stiffer chassis than any r33 gtr.

And i prefered my R34 GT-t over a 32 gtr.

But now my 750cc motorcycle does 0 - 100 in 2.8 seconds so what skyline can beat that?

I disagree with you on that one. What's a few kw difference? You're talking 20 kw. The r34 weighs 50kg more. 50kg on a circuit is slower than a few extra kw here and there.

You are forgetting that it's not just about outright power... it's about many other things. The R34GTT has vast developments in the engine (hence being badged the NEO), the turbine system (bigger than R33), the suspension, the brakes etc etc. Even the HICAS system in the R34GTT is vastly different to that on the R33GTST.

I think if you compare the facts; the power difference is noticeable but more so the torque. The NEO's VVT system is much more developed than that on the R33GTST I'm afraid.

I think the specs show that the R32 GTR was the quickest 0-100 and in a straight line. But since when are skylines drag cars??

They are gran touring cars designed for the track therefore if you really want to compare which care is quicker - look at track times.

You will see that Nissan has more brains then to put out a newer model car, which costs more money but is slower than its predecessor.

So if you want to know which car is the quickest in standard form, I would go with the latest models of each...

We are however forgetting the V35 -- no one has mentioned that.

People are not understanding, this is not an opinion, its about facts...which car is quicker...

The R32 GTR when sold did 0-100km/h in 4.7seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.0seconds!

That is quicker than an R33 GTR and an R34 GTR.... DISCUSSION OVER!!!

And dont start talking about N1's etc etc because we are just comparing the base GTR's and 32 is fastest, GAME OVER!

Its not all about straight line. Unless you're american.

with the GTS (non turbos) its between the R33 and R34 as they are 2.5L while the R32 which is only 2.0, but knowing the R34 probably has better technology it would be fastest in straight line

with the GTR's ive been hearing everyone say its the R32, but again the R34 would have the better tecnology.

0-100 1/4

R32 GTSt 6.5 14.8

R32 GTR 4.7 12.9

R33 GTSt 6.18 14.4

R33 GTR 5 13.1

R34 GTt 6.2 14.3

R34 GTR 4.9 12.9

+1

r32 GTR is the ledgend and an amazing achievment for a 1989 model car even by todays standards.

of course we all know the r34 is a better car overall, its just that it doesnt do anything the r32 already did 10 years earlier

/runs outside to hug r32 GTR

Imo, the r34 gtr is the fastest

and the r33 gtst is the fastest. the r34 gtt offers negligible power gains over the r33 gtst, yet it adds on about 50 kg.

this just shows that u have no f**king clue what so ever the impruved power and aerodynamics of the 34 make it far supirior then a 33 especialy the neo factor vvti u should go drive a 34 then sit in a 33 and see the difference

Its not concrete evidence but none of the other evidence in this thread is either but Best motoring compared stock examples of R32/33/34 against evo8 and sti9 and the track ranking was R34-STI-EVO-R33-R32. R32 got hammered big time on the track.

People are not understanding, this is not an opinion, its about facts...which car is quicker...

The R32 GTR when sold did 0-100km/h in 4.7seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.0seconds!

That is quicker than an R33 GTR and an R34 GTR.... DISCUSSION OVER!!!

And dont start talking about N1's etc etc because we are just comparing the base GTR's and 32 is fastest, GAME OVER!

This is correct,r32 GTR is the fastest over the 1/4 and 0-100.

There is no opinion,it is fact.

Also when you start on down the mod rd a r34 gtr will need more out put from it to match a modded r32 GTR.

It does not matter that the r34 has more advanced steering/suspension/braking systems from factory.

Once you start to heavily modify a GTR you will upgrade the suspension , brakes etc etc,so a heavily Modded R32 will have all its handling amd braking taken care of.

Bank on at least extracting an extra 50kws from the same 2.6 engine for a r34 gtr to even to match a r32 neck to neck.That means more stress on the engine plus a far bigger budget.

To make it simple for you.

A 400kw atw r32 vs a 400kw atw r34 ,the r32 will be the faster car based on the drivers having the exact same skill leval.

Said r34 would need more power to compete.Dragging that extra lard around has its price you know :glare:

Its not concrete evidence but none of the other evidence in this thread is either but Best motoring compared stock examples of R32/33/34 against evo8 and sti9 and the track ranking was R34-STI-EVO-R33-R32. R32 got hammered big time on the track.

Track times bring in countless variables, the particular cars condition, the drivers skill, the tyres each car has and it goes on and on.

What is fact is that the R32 GTR when new did 0-100km/h in 4.7 seconds and 0-400m in 13.0 seconds... Neither the R33 or R34 GTR can match that time!

AND if you read the original post #1 in this thread it assumes the cars are as new from factory (which makes sense as its a level playing field)

I would like japanese figures on which is faster only cuase A, they have enough of a market spread that there will be enough numbers to show that the 32r is faster. for one you can buy a 32 an mod it a fair bit for the price of a 34....

R32 has more potential, you can do ANYTHING with it, but it's fair to say that the R32 and R34 would be VERY close.

...R33 GTR not so much lol

I wonder if we can find a brand new R32 never driven against a R34??? gotta be someone out there that wants to prove this test for us

Track times bring in countless variables, the particular cars condition, the drivers skill, the tyres each car has and it goes on and on.

What is fact is that the R32 GTR when new did 0-100km/h in 4.7 seconds and 0-400m in 13.0 seconds... Neither the R33 or R34 GTR can match that time!

AND if you read the original post #1 in this thread it assumes the cars are as new from factory (which makes sense as its a level playing field)

Sorry but your wrong, there are best motoring videos (i hope you know what best motoring is) showing the r34 doing a 12.7 and also the r33 doing a 12.8 (or a 12.7, i will try and find the videos when i have some spare time) and both cars are completly stock.

They are lots of other best motoring videos with the r32,r33 and r34 racing together on the track, the r32 gets beaten by the r33 and r34 everytime.

As said above they are all great cars :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...