Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Forget about how much you love skylines for a second. To make it quick what should i get 98 WRX or a 93 R32 GTS-T. The only major reason i can think that the WRX is better is its a bit newer but all in all what are the pro's and con's of the cars?

Edited by Nth
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161230-forget-about-the-love-for-a-second/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Forget about how much you love skylines for a second. To make it quick what should i get 98 WRX or a 93 R32 GTS-T. The only major reason i can think that the WRX is better is its a bit newer but all in all what are the pro's and con's of the cars?

Dude your on a Skyline site! what do u think the answer will be?

Forget about how much you love skylines for a second. To make it quick what should i get 98 WRX or a 93 R32 GTS-T. The only major reason i can think that the WRX is better is its a bit newer but all in all what are the pro's and con's of the cars?

This topic was posted not long ago dude....the difference being a new WRX or R32.

Still the price comparison is too large.

Compare a WRX 98 to a GTR32........

You are like, I have said before. comparing apples to oranges...2 to 4 door...rear to 4 wheel drive...93 model to 98...7K to 18K.

You are not serious enough to own either one........

But if you are :) buy the WRX...newer and is not the bargain basement priced item of the two..

One of my best mates went out n got himself an MY00 Clubspec evo 4 for 30k with 90though on the clock. when it got to 120thou the motor shit itself lol from what i have heard boxers arent the most reliable motor esp with alot of km's showing. In my oppinion got the 32. Not as common as the scooby but beleive me awd aint that good....and no fun(for me that is).

Rwd will probably be more fun.. And the performance of a r32 V 98 rex is pretty close. The wrx will hold it's value better in the loong run and is a newer car so less hassles.. But they are also very common. Up to you but i was looking at a 96 rex and the 32 ended up being a better choice all things considered

Do we have a dedicated thread for "Comparing APPLES To ORANGES " on SAU?

Yeah...I want to make one up just for people who post.

Hey...I was just thinking....I can either buy a Datsun 200B or a Enzo Ferrari.

Not quite sure which one...now don't be biased..let me know what you guys and gurls thinking.

FFS ...it is a general discussion topic......have your say...don't have a pick on someone..

You haven't even had a say...

Yeah...I want to make one up just for people who post.

Hey...I was just thinking....I can either buy a Datsun 200B or a Enzo Ferrari.

Not quite sure which one...now don't be biased..let me know what you guys and gurls thinking.

FFS ...it is a general discussion topic......have your say...don't have a pick on someone..

You haven't even had a say...

ok here is what i think: i would pick a R32 over a 98WRX because the gearbox in those early WRXs are weak so it will become expensive after a certain level of mods. and i like to mod my car so R32 is the pick.

and im not picking on someone, just thought it would be fun to have a orange/apple thread since many of us like to compare them. for example:

-orange/apples are both roundish

-they grow on trees

-they have vitamin C

-they are fruits

there you see, despite all the differences there are quite many similarities too. my point is, IT IS really OKAY to compare apples with oranges.:rofl:

Edited by Forged
ok here is what i think: i would pick a R32 over a 98WRX because the gearbox in those early WRXs are weak so it will become expensive after a certain level of mods. and i like to mod my car so R32 is the pick.

and im not picking on someone, just thought it would be fun to have a orange/apple thread since many of us like to compare them. for example:

-orange/apples are both roundish

-they grow on trees

-they have vitamin C

-they are fruits

there you see, despite all the differences there are quite many similarities too. my point is, IT IS really OKAY to compare apples with oranges.:yes:

:thumbsup:

You have to peel the Orange...both taste different...grow at different times of the year in the same location.

NO..........my point ....they are as different as a women vs, men :laugh:

Just because these two cars have 4 tyres....thats were it ends.(there similarities.)

Buy the REX........or if you really want a car(Real car)...go gtst33.

Oranges are good for you..

Apple seeds contain "prunasin" which is a cyanogenic glycoside - a

chemical that can become a poison when it is digested - it releases cyanide.

:thumbsup:

Even though I don't know what his on about.

Clearly a bookworm...with lots of time to study :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...