Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Ive been hearing people saying that the Apexi Power Intake pod filter flutters and releases a wastegate type noise when u take ur leg off the throttle similar to a blow off valve. Is this true, as i currently have a K&N pod filter, and was wondering does the apexi flutter (eg. BOV or wategate pressure release).

Who has one, is it better performance wise or is it just all noise.

Cheers

John

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/161823-apexi-power-intake-flutter/
Share on other sites

in no way what so ever will a pod filter make the flutter/venting noise. its all to do with the bov you have. all a pod kit does is eliminate the muffling effect that the stock box has and allows the sound made by your bov to resonate (echo). now some pods by different companies will affect the sound to varying degrees due to their differnt design, but they are all basically justa bit of shaped paper, foam or wiremesh on the end of a tube. just like the one you already have on your car

Since it's already been brought up, I've upgraded to a HKS 2535 but only on 10psi (for now)

I used to have the standard turno on 12psi and never had the flutter, just the load Pssshhhh,

Now with this turbo i get the flutter???? It's on the standard BOV. Only happens on full load between changes

Is the BOV reaching it's capacity?

I don't mind the noise but if it's gunna cause any damage, i'd like it sorted sooner than later.

Thanks guys.,.

Since it's already been brought up, I've upgraded to a HKS 2535 but only on 10psi (for now)

I used to have the standard turno on 12psi and never had the flutter, just the load Pssshhhh,

Now with this turbo i get the flutter???? It's on the standard BOV. Only happens on full load between changes

Is the BOV reaching it's capacity?

I don't mind the noise but if it's gunna cause any damage, i'd like it sorted sooner than later.

Thanks guys.,.

I've just gotten my 2535 on too and have noticed something similar...only difference is that i have a rb20det and i'm using a standard gtr bov...any ideas people?

i had a very slight fluttering noise when i put my pod on when i back off the throttle gently but as soon as i installed my fround mount geez it flutters like crazy. it must be echoing off the intercooler pipes and gets heard through the pod im guessing?

for the guy with the 2535, you just need to adjust your bov, although your running the same boost, the 2535 will be feeding your motor cooler air, so there will physically be more air in the system, hence its fluttering now, same goes for you tek 01 with a front mount theres alot more air in there still when you back off, so thats why it will flutter now, just need to adjust your bov

in no way what so ever will a pod filter make the flutter/venting noise. its all to do with the bov you have. all a pod kit does is eliminate the muffling effect that the stock box has and allows the sound made by your bov to resonate (echo). now some pods by different companies will affect the sound to varying degrees due to their differnt design, but they are all basically justa bit of shaped paper, foam or wiremesh on the end of a tube. just like the one you already have on your car

the noise is always present and is amplified by the pod type, i dont run bovs at all and get crazy (dose, flutter and whateva) intake reverb noise on the rb26 and the SR20. BOV's can alter this noise but again have nothing to do with the cause.....only the effect

Edited by URAS

Well it seems like alot of ppl have the flutter with POD's etc. Well i have a front mount with CAI, pod and a stock BOV and i cant seem to get any flutter!!!! Any one tell me why not?????? (just a big woosh) HELP

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...