Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SORRY FOR LATE REPLYS

how do you get it nice and big and round? what did you use to shape the sheet? im assuming u started with aluminium sheet?
looking at it, it was a half tube for the round section

hammer and doly or english wheel for the other bends ..

please correct me if im wrong though

its a half tube with sheet metal welded onto it, its welded on both sides so that i could remove the welds on the outside with out the plenum leaking

Wow, nice man! lets see some number when you get them. Noticable gains or what? if you ever start selling them i would buy one off ya. good job

i do sell them

wat 180 :S ?

the rb has found a new home in the engine bay of a 180sx

Edited by STR8E180
  • 3 weeks later...

ok so i was wondering about one of your plenums for my rb25/30 combo the main reason i want one is to solve the bonet clearance issues that the stock intake manifold has. ill be aiming for around 300rwkw and was just after a price and also was wondering does it use the stock throttle body and cable and also where does all the stuff like your acc valve (idle control) and the rest of that stuff go vacume hoses ect thanx in advance i will be looking at getting one in the near future so hope you can help.

  • 3 months later...

Saw you post this link in a thread. Do you actually have any real world results from cars. I have a std RB20 which needs a little help making a bit more power. Dont want to lose any mid range torque though...and my fear is moving away from the long std runners will hurt me in the mid range? Any experience with different RB20 setups? Im running a TD06-20G making 260rwkws on 18-19psi

^^^ as above, lets see some before & after dyno sheets showing no loss of midrange.

Shaun @ Boostworx has even seen a RIPS plenum hold back peak power over the stocker - so after hearing that i need real world results before money is parted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...