Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all

got a new set of rims measuring 17x8 front and 17x9 rear.

whats the best street tyres to get at the moment?

im thinking 235/45/17 at the front and 255/45/17 at the rear but ist possible to have 265 or even 275 for the 9" rear rims?

its a daily driver so im not interested in street legal semi slicks.

yeah which brand and model tyres would you recommend?

say for a budget of around $1500.

any advice is much apreciated. thanks.

Edited by BaysideBlue
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169619-widest-possible-tyres-on-17x9-rims/
Share on other sites

you can fit 265's onto a 9" rim no problems. However it won't provide you with as much latteral grip as a 245 or 255 tyre as there will be a lot more flex in the tyre due to the way it fit's onto the rim.

your idea of 235 fronts and 255 rears is perfect IMO.

for which tyre best suits read the tyre thread at the top of this page :)

depending on brand of tyres you go for you may be better off going for a 225 on the front and a 235 on the rear.

if you go for cheap brand tyres then go for a 275 rear, it will fit.

but if you go something quality like a S-03 Bridgestone you will only need 225 front and 235 rear

i have 265 on my 9" inch rims looks good as far as handling goes I'd probably go 235 or 245. I picked up 265's for 160 each there federals so not the best tyre but good price :) be careful if you go 265's companies try charge you through the ass as the tyres are hard to come across

but if you go something quality like a S-03 Bridgestone you will only need 225 front and 235 rear

Why? why not go 235/255 with good tyres, why would you get skinnier tyres when you go to a better tyre? ontop of the fact 225's on a a 9" rim look retarded.

I've got 255's all round on my GTR with 17x9 rims. perfect fit, tyre lines up with the edge of the rim exactly.

Why? why not go 235/255 with good tyres, why would you get skinnier tyres when you go to a better tyre? ontop of the fact 225's on a a 9" rim look retarded.

I've got 255's all round on my GTR with 17x9 rims. perfect fit, tyre lines up with the edge of the rim exactly.

i also have 255 all round on 18x9 and they are spot on tyre fit i reckon

I would go a 225 on the front and 235 rear. or if you want you can go 235 front and 245/255 (depends on availability).

Amongst my cars I've had:

235 all round on 9inch rims (GTR)

245 all round on 9 inch rims (GTR)

255 all round on 9 inch rims (GTR)

235 all round on 9inch rims (GTST)

225 front (i think, they may be 235) on 8 inch rims and 255 rear on 9 inch rims (soarer).

the 255s are ok on the 9, but I reckon 235 or 245 will be better (a lot depends on tyre brand though).

If you are putting them on a skyline and you dont want your speedo to be out the closest match to stock (205/55/16 225/50/16) is 255/40/17

245/40 is close as well but 245/45 is by memory 3.3% too fast.

I currently have 245/45 but have always in the past had 255/40, i think this is a better size than the 245s which have a taller sidewall but get slightly stretched across the rim.

I believe stock r33gtr is 245/40 but most owners just replace with 245/45 due to availability.

265s usually bulge out a bit on 9inch rims, doesnt look good IMO and probably allows for a bit more sidewall flex.

Read the tyre thread for opinions on tyres. With that budget you can get top of the range street tyres so it just depends on what compromise you want.

If you are putting them on a skyline and you dont want your speedo to be out the closest match to stock (205/55/16 225/50/16) is 255/40/17

245/40 is close as well but 245/45 is by memory 3.3% too fast.

I currently have 245/45 but have always in the past had 255/40, i think this is a better size than the 245s which have a taller sidewall but get slightly stretched across the rim.

I believe stock r33gtr is 245/40 but most owners just replace with 245/45 due to availability.

265s usually bulge out a bit on 9inch rims, doesnt look good IMO and probably allows for a bit more sidewall flex.

Read the tyre thread for opinions on tyres. With that budget you can get top of the range street tyres so it just depends on what compromise you want.

sure...:rofl:

I'm running 17x8 on the fronts and 17x9's on the rears .

optimal tyres settings I've found so far are 235(45 profile) fronts and 255(40 profile) for daily use.

I guess it also comes down the design of the sidewalls and the profile. I'm running Bridgestones Potenza S-02's (best tyres ever!) on the rear which have a great sidewall and tread pattern to suit wide rims (I've had 2 styles of S-02's so far and the 1st pair of 255's stretched over rims more while the 2nd pair sat evenly without stretching, Later on I found out the S-02's were designed for specific cars, 1st ones were for a Porsche 993 while the 2nd was for a HSV).

You should also really take into account the offset of the rims your running too, against the tyres your thinking of putting on otherwise you may risk rubbing your guards.

Hope it helps.

Edited by Jenius

its been covered but still to 255 on the rear, i had 9" with 255 and suited to the ground, and now i have 275 on 10 which is just as good....you dont want to stretch it, just get a wider rim.....go the 275's

If you are putting them on a skyline and you dont want your speedo to be out the closest match to stock (205/55/16 225/50/16) is 255/40/17

245/40 is close as well but 245/45 is by memory 3.3% too fast.

I currently have 245/45 but have always in the past had 255/40, i think this is a better size than the 245s which have a taller sidewall but get slightly stretched across the rim.

I believe stock r33gtr is 245/40 but most owners just replace with 245/45 due to availability.

265s usually bulge out a bit on 9inch rims, doesnt look good IMO and probably allows for a bit more sidewall flex.

Read the tyre thread for opinions on tyres. With that budget you can get top of the range street tyres so it just depends on what compromise you want.

225/50/16 112.6 sidewall (406mm wheel + 225mm = 631 diamter)

255/40/17 is 102mm (so total diameter would be 17 inch 432mm + 204mm = 636 diamter)

245/40/17 has a sidewall of 98mm (432+196 = 628)

245/45/17 has a sidewall of 110 (432+220=652)

so the closest to stock diameter is 245/40. but to be honest speedo accuracy has never bothered me a bit. the speedo is only accurate to about 10% to begin with anyway.

and no, standard 33 GTR size is 235/45/17 not 245.

225/50/16 112.6 sidewall (406mm wheel + 225mm = 631 diamter)

255/40/17 is 102mm (so total diameter would be 17 inch 432mm + 204mm = 636 diamter)

245/40/17 has a sidewall of 98mm (432+196 = 628)

245/45/17 has a sidewall of 110 (432+220=652)

so the closest to stock diameter is 245/40. but to be honest speedo accuracy has never bothered me a bit. the speedo is only accurate to about 10% to begin with anyway.

and no, standard 33 GTR size is 235/45/17 not 245.

Yeah ~3% is not enough to bother me either which is why i went for the 245/45s... and as you say speedo only has to be within 10%, but i dont believe that the stock 33 gtr tyre size is 235/45/17 i am sure it is 245/ either 40 or 45 as mentioned by t04gtr.

Speaking of wrong compliance stickers i have one on my own car, it states that 255/40/17 is a standard size.

seems I could be wrong. I was just remembereing the japanese sticker on the door jamb on my 33 GTR, BUT my memory is not that flash. I would say that call was 50% memory, 50% talking out of my arse.

Is't a good time to get Bridgestone S-03s? They are due to be replaced soon and are on special at the moment.

I've got a quote for 255/40ZR17 94Y $410 a tyre

and 225/45ZR17 91Y $305 each

both rolling diameter 636mm

in terms of price and performance, are there better value alternatives at the moment?

cheers

Is't a good time to get Bridgestone S-03s? They are due to be replaced soon and are on special at the moment.

I've got a quote for 255/40ZR17 94Y $410 a tyre

and 225/45ZR17 91Y $305 each

both rolling diameter 636mm

in terms of price and performance, are there better value alternatives at the moment?

cheers

I think that all the higher end bridgestones are overpriced, and if those prices you quoted are 'specials' then that proves my point :P

There are a few similar tyres that you can get for a fair bit less. Dig up motor magazine tyre test but off the top of my head but if i were looking at that type of tyre ring around for:

Dunlop sp-sport maxx

Falken fk-452

Falken rt-615 (higher performance worse treadwear)

Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3

All of those tyres have similar performance to the S03 but cost less.

Tempe has the 615s in 225/45/17 for ~$275, and you can get the sport maxxs for a good price right now from a few places in 235/45.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...