Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good to hear your alright Cy. Dale, Chuckie, Duncan, Hugh, Nick and Brendan are still about on the forum.

Someone's gotta appreciate this... genuine RX3 wagon. A mate of mine has a 13B bridgeport that does easy 9s. lol

rx4wagon.jpg

RX3 Wagons are sexy as HELL!

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 year later...

Yep going by the google translations it definitely is a WC34. Apparently built by students of the Japan Automobile College.

Bentley is a custom wind Stagea.

Bentley seems amazing sense of weight! !

Hats off to ideas that seemed surprisingly Bentley Mira Gino rear tail lights.

Encountered in the local production of the test vehicle caravan (NATS)! !

I was allowed to be taken up close to our vehicle of NATS are known to be showcased in a custom car blowed-away car event every year.

Custom car had been exhibited at the Tokyo Auto Salon 2012 was a tremendous leave impressed with any degree of completion.

Stagea based in Bentley in the wind! !

Here is the individual based on the type Stagea WC34. The theme is, "Bentley station wagon are sold in the 20s limited world in the past, if you also ... If you are reselling" is.

There is some other interesting cars as well. Like this Soarer come DeLorean.

7384557018_bc4a5b41fc_z.jpg

7384557816_0dc90b4270_z.jpg

7384558476_2ef618a1a9_z.jpg

Not quite a wagon but definitely whacky. And definitely hats-off to the work that has gone into these.

Edited by QJQ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...