Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

Sorry to bring up an old thread, but i need a bit of help.

I will be installing my nismo 555cc injectors and setting up my power fc for the injectors in the next couple of weeks (running a HKS 3037 Pro S and all the supporting mods) before i book it in for a tune, i have worked out the injector correction and injector latency correction numbers that i need to change in the PFC, can somone please comfirm for me that these are 100% correct? :)

"INJECTOR CORRECTION"

- Formula = stock 370cc divided by nismo 555cc = 0.66cc x 100 = 66%.

So i would go into the power fc and change the INJ correction to 66%, correct?

"INJECTOR LATENCY CORRECTION"

From what i have found the latency for the nismo's is 0.71msec and stock is 0.52msec

- Formula = nismo 0.71msec minus stock 0.52msec = 0.19msec

So i would change the INJ Latency numbers for each injector to 0.19msec, correct?

Hopefully this can help people in the future that are looking for the correction numbers :D.

By the way, someone should sticky this thread!!

Cheers

i did not check your maths but the theory and formula's are correct.

therefore if your maths is correct you are ok to go :rofl:

deatschwerks 450cc RB25det sidefeed injectors

Min Open time (ms) max idc 6v 7v 8v 9v 10v 11v 12v 13v 14v 15v 16v 17v

1.1 94% 5.89 4.48 2.97 2.25 1.88 1.73 1.46 1.37 1.25 1.12 1.09 1.02

deatchwerks 550cc RB25det sidefeed injectors

6v 7v 8v 9v 10v 11v 12v 13v 14v 15v 16v 17v

5.88 3.50 2.62 2.07 1.80 1.56 1.42 1.32 1.19 1.11 1.07 0.95

I'll check mine, I have 555cc Nismo's running.

I found anything under 0.30ms and I couldn't do a thing.

They were really hard to set.

You can have my settings if you want, they seem to work perfectly.

I think its 77% and 0.44msec. I'll double check on my way home this afternoon.

I'll check mine, I have 555cc Nismo's running.

I found anything under 0.30ms and I couldn't do a thing.

They were really hard to set.

You can have my settings if you want, they seem to work perfectly.

I think its 77% and 0.44msec. I'll double check on my way home this afternoon.

Sounds good :banana:, would be good to have your settings just incase mine dont work when i put my numbers into the power fc

Any idea why yours only work on 0.30msec? did you try the 66% and 0.19msec (using the formula in the power fc FAQ) before adjusting them yourself?

Is anyone else using nismo 555cc's able to go into there PFC and check what settings they have theirs set to? would be a big help!

Cheers

  • 3 weeks later...

I just finished installing my nismo 555cc injectors, i set up the injectors settings in the PFC like this: injectors correction = 66%, latency correction = 0.18msec (when i worked this out i came up with 0.19msec but the PFC latecy correction only goes up in 2's so i had to choose either 0.18msec or 0.20msec, i tried both and they didnt seem to be much different).

Started the car and it seems to run ok, i havent driven it, have only had it idling, it seems to idle "ok" but it is a bit rough, does this sound normal? is it just running a bit to rich? it dosent seem to smell overly rich.

Im dropping my car off to the tuners on monday so imtrying to get everything running the best i can so he dosent have to spend to much time stuffing around with it.

I got this figure from Google as i wanted to get the 555cc NISMO injectors for my GTS25t as well. Latency is 0.75msec. So settings for my Apexi Power FC are calcutated as such;

370 / 555 = 0.67 x 100 = 67%

0.75 - 0.528 = +0.222msec

Something like that.

Edited by teng

I just went out and started my car up again just to see how it was running, took two goes to get it started, still idling very lumpy, also it is now "spitting" lots of white smoke out the exhaust and smells super rich, almost like its just spraying pure petrol out the exhaust, it dosent idle to bad just a bit lumpy and rough, took out #1 spark plug and it was a little wet and smells of fuel.

Will the white smoke just be from it running way to rich? i always thought if it was running too rich it would have been black smoke, the smoke dosent smell like oil at all.

I think i might just leave the settings how they are now, even though its not running to great, im sure my tuner will be able to sort things out.

ok well i'll tell you my experiences...

I was using the default setting for what should be correct for the nismos 555ccs: being 66.5% and 0.18ms.

my car (r33 rb25det) was running way to rich so now im still running 0.18ms latency but 60% injector size correction. i once read that the factory injectors are 340cc not 370cc.

has anyone ever actually measured them??? or got this info from nissan?

Just had my car tuned a couple of days ago, he left used the injector settings that i had already set up in the PFC.

So just to clarify for future rb25det owners in the process of setting up their PFC for nismo 555cc injectors, use these settings, just like shown in the PFC FAQ

INJ correction = 66%

Latency correction = 0.18msec

Hope this helps people in the future!

Cheers :thumbsup:

  • 1 month later...
So what would be the correction for:

Going from 555cc to 740cc Nismo?

ignore the fact you have 555 and refer to the simple formula divide the original injector cc by the new injector cc. In your case 50%

  • 4 months later...

hey guys

i finally have some nismo 555cc injectors for my R32 gtst with rb20det. I am running a remaped ecu at the momment and will be changing over to the pfc pro i have laying around and these injectors before i drive it most likely to godzilla motorsports for a tune.

I am trying to work out two things so i can drive it there. What the new injector correction and latency is, and also if i need to add a gtr resistor pack when i install the injectors. I am only second guessing things because i noticed they have the same part number as the 555s for the 32 gtr. I purchased them from greenline and they didnt say anything about needing one but i didnt ask either.

I have read thru the pfc faq (thanks paul), and from what i can work out the correction and latency is something like this:

Old SIZE / New Size = Correction

New Latency - Old Latency = Latency Correction

So i think rb20 stock is

260 / 555 = .4684 * 100 = 46.8468%

.? - .71 = ?

So basically i dont know the latency for the nismo 555cc injectors when they are for the rb20det, i think most of the info in this thread is for the yellow rb25 ones :rolleyes:

Cheers guys

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...