Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^^^ dnt stress to much about the latency, your tuner can do it 90% of the cars (even tuned) that come to my workshop have not even had this set..... i always set it but at the end of the day it wont effect the car bugger all if you just want to drive it down to the tuner.

the important one is the injector correction.

  • 2 months later...

hmm... coz i swap the little rubber o rins from my stock ones and put them on my new ones... put a tad of vasoline on them so they slipped in...

dang are they stufed now if there locked??

wll i found that the car was WAY flooded........ like un believable...

not before i got startin it.. the 66% and .18 will be fine??

or shall i got 80% as some ppl i know run 80% and .00

cheers all..

  • 4 months later...

i have a set of deatschwerks 650cc side feed (red) rb25det injectors and im not sure how to set the lag/latency. the information i have is:

16v - 1.072

14v - 1.192

12v - 1.420

10v - 1.8

8v - 2.62

6v - 5.88

now how do i change that infomation into a ms reading that i can subtract the stock injector lag from to enter into my power fc??

i think i have a more complete voltage list like that in my email (cant check it right now though, at work) that goes from like 4v to 17v for ever 1v if that would help anyone help me, i can post later

Edited by ANVIL

I also have hi flowed red top injectors for RB25, mine are 680. i think red tops come out of some 300zx's and KA24 or whatever the 2.4l nissan donk comes in bluebirds and US-spec 240sx's

i know the correction will be 54% but unsure of the Latencies.

i'm going buy what Uras (trent) said and hope the tuner will deal with it...

  • 5 months later...
just got an email from Deatschwerks which gave me this info for redtop side feeds the time would be .64ms

so:

.64 - .52 = +.11

i will post all the voltages too when i get home if i remember

ANVIL the voltages were posted for the DW red 650cc's above. I know it has been a while, but how did your RB run with these lag settings? And did you also change the latency settings "Inj Lag (ms) vs. BatV" to match the DW provided voltages??

  • 5 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...