Jump to content
SAU Community

200SX S14 how many cylinders do they have?  

78 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Tell him that even though there are 2 less cyl than he originally thought he can make up for the difference with a 100hp nos sticker. i sounds like he will actually believe it lol.

I hope he never gets a 200sx! it would be a crime against nature

haha, yeh hes a 16 year punk. loves s14's wants an n/a one for his first car i believe. lol hes gonna HATE seeing this

Good f**king luck.

There are no factory-fitted SR20DE powered S14s in this country. No-one brought in the S14 Q's under the grey import rules, and I can't imagine there's anyone stupid enough to pull the SR20DET out of an S14 either.

But, judging by your mate's track record, he could be the first.

He can get an S13 Q's or an Autech S15 if he wants NA, but I hope he doesn't. Silvias get enough idiots buying them, they don't need any more.

i couldnt find v8 as one of the choices though....please alter the poll for your friend's sake kthnx :)

Should add W16 in as a poll option, and so he can tell his mates that Bugatti did a VL Commo and bought the Veyron engine from Nissan.

16yrs old?

enough said then. imaginary facts in his own head and those of his mates who obviously know no more than him take precendence.

i'd hate to know what they think powers a barina or swift!

just let him go buy his N/A S14 and laugh at his frustration when he can't find a factory version.

Come on guys... everyone knows that all silvias came out stock standard with v8's.

Just check out the pic...

post-29218-1183446611_thumb.jpg

This s13 is stock as... straight from the factory... heard they were putting a v10 in the s16 :domokun:

:blush:

Come on guys... everyone knows that all silvias came out stock standard with v8's.

Just check out the pic...

post-29218-1183446611_thumb.jpg

This s13 is stock as... straight from the factory... heard they were putting a v10 in the s16 :thumbsup:

:O

how ripped off was I then? when i bought my silvia i didn't even realise the previous owner had filled in the hole in the bonnet and ripped out half the cylinders...

glad I sold it then cos now I drive a stock standard jet powered stagea :) For the record I think nissan bought these off bugatti...

lol :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...