Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Firstly, i know this is in the wrong section but i need an answer by tomorrow and there was only one person reading the suspension, breaking and tyres thread.

I'm buying new tyres tomorrow and i want to know if fitting a 225/50/R16 tyre on stock 6" wide R32 GTS-T wheels is overkill?

Will i get more grip or just more sidewall flex as apposed to a 205/55/R16 tyre which are fitted at the moment?

Should i just stick with the 205's?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/178383-sacrificing-sidewall-flex-for-grip/
Share on other sites

is it going to be for track drag use? if yes then go the 225's. is street/track then go 205's or 215's. i ran 225's on my stock 33 wheels and didn't really notice a difference. they gripped a bit better and didn't really notice any sidewall flex when cornering, but that was only street use.

Firstly, i know this is in the wrong section but i need an answer by tomorrow and there was only one person reading the suspension, breaking and tyres thread.

I'm buying new tyres tomorrow and i want to know if fitting a 225/50/R16 tyre on stock 6" wide R32 GTS-T wheels is overkill?

Will i get more grip or just more sidewall flex as apposed to a 205/55/R16 tyre which are fitted at the moment?

Should i just stick with the 205's?

225 tyres will be to large for any type of track work....unless it is for drag.

205/45/16 are the way to go on 6 Inch rims for your car.....remember wider is not always better.

EDITED..Sorry..I meant 205/55/16..Cheers

--------------------------------------------------

Your side walls will hold in corners with this size.

Also if you forget to pump up your tyres and run lower pressure for a while with the 225's your side wall corner tread

will wear quickly and you will have to run...high pressures after to try and even them out.

Don't forget also...some tyre manufacturers under state the widths..so also depends on the make.

I've had some weird and wacky combinations in the past on my car. For a long time I was running 215/60/15 on the stock SR rims (5.5"). The tyres looked very bulgy, but did quite a few mountain drives / skid pan sessions and never had a big problem with flex plus the grip was amazing.

I am now running 225/50/16 on R32 rims on the arse end, and it does not look nearly as bulgy as the above combination was. I am going to give it a go at the track next weekend as two of my semi-slicks have had it and the other two tyres that I have aren't nearly grippy enough.

ps. If you go to this site: http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp and type in the two tyres sizes you are comparing, you will see that the 225/50/16 combination is recommended for rims that are 6-8.5" wide.

Edited by Thunderbolt

you could always try and get yourself a set of 300zx rims. they are about a 7.5" rim, so you could run 225/50/16s and not worry about flex.

205/45/16 are the way to go on 6 Inch rims for your car.....remember wider is not always better.

you would also have to take into account what the track is like. if it is rough the smaller sidewall of these tyres is going to make it rougher, and it will alter your gearing slightly, since the stock size has a higher profile, at 55.

at the end of the day tyre compund is going to have the biggest affect on grip. if you get a set of hard tyres they won't grip as well as a set of sticky tyres. a set of 195 semi slicks will out perform crappy, hard 245's.

I'm running 225's all round at the moment, and prior to that, was running 205's all round.

The launching traction was noticeable but the sidewall flex pissed me off when in the twisties. I'm going to run 205's on the front and 225's on the rear next time.

For circuit work you need to know the actual tread width of the tyre, not the numbers, in order to make an informed choice. Rim width should equal or be up to 30mm wider than the tread width.

Hey guys, thanks for the replies.

I should have specified that the tyres were for the rear only. I had previously ran 205's on the front and 225's on the rear but decided this time to go with 205's all round.

I ended up buying Continental Tyres. Has anyone else used these before? I was a bit sceptical as i haden't heard alot about them but they are of excellent quality and cars such as BMW and Mercedes come with them fitted from factory. They're very big in europe.

They were $285 a tyre, marked down to $185 each on special and i got a deal so i got them for $175 each or $350 for both.

I mentioned sidewall flex in terms of drifting. I'm hoping to enter in a Winton practice day the one after the kamakazi battle. I have a set of old 205's and a set of old 225's so i will be able to find out first hand the amonut of sidewall flex i do get if any.

Cheers.

Those Continentals looked perfect fit in 205's.... I dont think there was any real issue when you were running 225's on the rear for the street but when you go to winton i would just be using the 205's.

From my personel experince stretching the tyre just a bit (235 on a 9" rim) made a noticable difference from my street 255's. It felt much nicer overall. I would like to test a 225 on my 9" but the 235's are so easy and cheap to get my hands on.

Also different tyre brands vary so much - 235 bridgestone is more stretched than say a 235 nankang etc. for example

Might be worth trying a 195, 205 and a 225 before the track day to see what feels right?

Or buying some wider rims :(

Well I thought I would give some feedback after running 225/50/16 on the rear of the car on the track today. I didn't notice any flex at all, however the tyres didn't grip as nicely as I would have liked. It was probably made more noticeable because I was running semi-slicks at the front.

depends on brand....

some brand will have a stiff enough sidewall that it wont matter, whereas some are really soft and allow the tyre to move more.

but its better to have a correct sized tyre. so 205 is a better fit.

  • 1 month later...

This may seem silly. What is the difference in profile between 50 / 55 / etc? Does a bigger number mean that the verticle height of the tyre is higher? Does a smaller number mean that the overall diameter of the tyre is smaller?

yeah 55 is higher than 50 for the same width, but the even sillier thing is its not 5mm or 5cm or anything like that. It is the height of the sidewall as a % of width.

so a 265/35/18 is about the same height overall as 235/45/17. there are calculators around to calculate equivalent sizes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...