Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fully rebuilt/balanced bottom end

Head with tomei 260 cams

heavy duty valve springs/retainers

k-line valve guides

port and polish

bolted down with head studs

With the standard solid lifters, would it be safe to set rev limit to 9000rpm? maybe even 9500? Only drag/street? what to raise rpm to take full advantage of a to4z :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180824-neo-max-rpm/
Share on other sites

Adriano... He says it's fully rebuilt and balanced.

I rev mine with a standard bottom end, but with Tomei Poncams to 7800.

it's still making good power there and only just starting to taper off there.

keep reving it until it starts to nose over and see how you go.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180824-neo-max-rpm/#findComment-3287429
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

Surely you would give it to your tuner and let him play with the max RPM while he's tuning it?  If you're chasing max RPM then max HP should be the limiting factor.  Let your tuner decide when upping the RPM no longer has any benefit.

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180824-neo-max-rpm/#findComment-7920384
Share on other sites

Shim over bucket. Don't even think** that it is "as good as" an RB26 from that point of view. Rev it too fast and you stand a very good chance of spitting shims and saying goodbye to some $$.

I would suggest not much more than 8500 rpm unless sworn to and guaranteed by a person who has experience setting up Neo heads with similar cams and springs and knows what they will and won't do.

No. Do not "let the tuner play with it". Tuners and engine builders and not always the same thing. Some tuners know f**k all about the metal bits. Ask the guy who knows about the metal bits.

 

** That's an instruction, not my opinion.

Edited by GTSBoy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180824-neo-max-rpm/#findComment-7920386
Share on other sites

You will find that spinning past 8k starts to get pointless as you can't get into gears and spit power steering belt - unless you've got an auto or a sequential.

But yeah, I've spun mine to 9k rpm just to hear what it sounds like, and each time it kisses the limiter at 9.2k it shoots off a powersteering belt

Yet to go on the dyno, but with timing figures at 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 11, 11, 12, 12, 13, 13 it's more than safe.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180824-neo-max-rpm/#findComment-7920425
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
    • Running rich in conditions where it shouldn't probably won't do great things for catalytic converter lifespan. I would fix that sooner than later.
×
×
  • Create New...