Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay,

Went in expecting around 180ish rwhp, as my car was misfiring on 7psi..... *sigh*

Pulled 208.8hp@7psi (not bad for stock boost) with a power curve that looks like a set of stairs....

I gots Zorst (w/front pipe), POD, Cold Air, and stock boost...

after having a chat to steve he commented that the timing was retarded a bit, and suggested i advance it a bit for more power... what a difference that made! was able to up the boost to 11psi, no misfiring at all, and the power pulled all the way to redline... DAM.. Kym wants another run!!!!!!

Thanks for the advice steve, i'll be back to tune the new AFC and EBC real soon...

-Kym

edit - Mod :don't forget the no cat kymbo which gives about 10-15 at the rears from the cars i've seen with it and without it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18310-sst-dyno-day-post-your-results-mods/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I hate to steal their thunder.....but :D

There were 2 manual NA RB30's R31's both around 135rwHP

And a very sweet lookin Manual RB20DET GTS-X which put down 137rwHP

I think my wagon was a off the pace due to being auto...manuals were held in 4th, my auto was in 2nd I believe. :O

Originally posted by adam 32

strich9: so your car was misifiring cos the timing was retarded?  

what revs was it misfiring at? (i only ask cos ive got a bit of a flat spot at the moment im trying to sort out)

Yep, Sure was Adam. As soon as I cas-bashed it a bit 2mm (on the cas) advance, all the misfiring stopped except for a small pop ord two between 4-5rpm. Immediately the car pulled like a train and I was able to wind the boost all the way up to 11psi. I HAD to run 7psi before or the misfire was really bad...

It also had MAJOR flat spotting before the timing was corrected.

Attached my dyno sheet :D

dynosst.jpg

343.6 at 1.2 bar on std ceremic terbs with boost control going all over the place. No damage done and boost control now sorted (I wound up the boost and left the duty cycle at a default 60% which is way too high compared to what has been "self learnt" for the lower 1.0 bar boost).

Mods: HKS engine pipe, Jap spec cat, HKS Hiper Zaust, PFC with boost kit. Normal boost 1.0 bar delivered 318 hp atw previously.

Mine managed to get itself to 210.2 HP. Got to 198 with nothing tuned then Steve quickly added fuel to my top end which got me to the 210. Will have to get my S-AFCII tuned properly and wind a bit more boost into her. Might help if i make a partion for my HKS pod, damn that thing's noisy.

For mods, see signature. Note: Nothing tuned yet....

Originally posted by S13_Angel

233.7hp @ 12psi

fmic, pod, 3" zorst (turbo back), badbiki.

very impressive angel, no wonder shes such a sleeper

as for me see the sig its got all the info, theres more roomto play but i don't think it would reliable then

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...