Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone. i have in my possesion two turbo's that have come off r33's. One i don't know what series it came off and its is labeled 45v3, i one i am told has come off a 97 series 2 r33 and it is labeled 45v2.

Now i have done some searching and from what everyone is saying that there is no difference in them. on a visual check they both look the same, but if you look at my attached pics they have different compressor wheels. and thats the only difference.

45V3

post-34711-1188816122_thumb.jpg

45V2

post-34711-1188816252_thumb.jpg

my questions are, is this normal? and will one perform better than the other?

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183562-std-r33-turbos/
Share on other sites

So from what i've read/heard, the later number is the later turbo... 1 and 2 came on series 1 and 1.5, v3 and v4 came on series 2's....

Series 2 has a nylon/plastic/whatever compressor wheel, thus it spools earlier/quicker.

I really thought the dual-fin was the series 2, to help spool lower down. Man, now i'm confused!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183562-std-r33-turbos/#findComment-3325778
Share on other sites

i've just stripped them down and come to the same conclusion as RANDY and MANWHORE. one is steel wheel and one is plastic. yeah is for an rb20, i already had the steel wheel one on there, and managed to get the other one fairly cheap so i grabbed it.

so the plastic one would be better to run, i.e quicker spool, better power? and would i be right in saying they would be very prone to blowing up if overboosted? safely boosted at 14psi on an everyday driver?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183562-std-r33-turbos/#findComment-3327473
Share on other sites

The compressor wheel is not the problem, both turbo's have a ceramic turbine wheel (the part the breaks).

The compressor wheel IS a problem on the S2s, quite a few people have had them break under duress. I'm one of those :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183562-std-r33-turbos/#findComment-3328693
Share on other sites

Standard RB20 turbo on my RB20 ran absolutely fine at 14psi for a little over 6 months till I put a s1 RB25 turbo on there. Rb25 turbo is currently running 12psi due to lack of fuel at high rpm. New pump and remap and I'll turn it up to 14psi, I have no fears. Personally I believe the majority of failures are due to people winding the boost up without a full exhaust, the existing restriction in dump/front pipe/cat combined with the extra gasses being forced through heats up the turbine/housing a fair bit.. when my stock cat shat itself, dislodged and blocked up, my turbine housing (rb20 turbo) would glow almost transluscent red.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183562-std-r33-turbos/#findComment-3333628
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
×
×
  • Create New...