Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi

I work in a large IT department and I am also very IT orientated so I've looked into this thoroughly. Viewing the site from home or work I've noticed its extremely slow.

Work has a 2mbit up and 2mbit down, and home has 8mbit down and 384k up.

Both browse the site at the same speed.

Is it because we are hosted overseas or are there other reasons?

Thanks

Jono

Edited by The Mafia
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185350-site-is-really-slow/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

start -> run -> type in "cmd", press "OK" -> in the command prompt type in "tracert www.skylinesaustralia.com"

you shoudl get something like...

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

E:>tracert www.skylinesaustralia.com/

Tracing route to www.skylinesaustralia.com/ [208.67.219.137]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

 1	 2 ms	 1 ms	 1 ms  <edit: hehe can't go givin that away>
 2	72 ms	89 ms	71 ms  <snip>
 3	83 ms	73 ms	75 ms  <snip>
 4	78 ms   207 ms   206 ms  59.154.14.81
 5   274 ms   283 ms   298 ms  g11-1.core01.lax04.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.12.225]
 6   277 ms   281 ms   284 ms  p1-0.core02.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.2.237]
 7   292 ms   291 ms   293 ms  p12-0.core01.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.241]
 8   294 ms   331 ms   291 ms  p14-0.core01.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.74]
 9   293 ms   295 ms   294 ms  p4-0.core01.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.93]
10   289 ms   290 ms   290 ms  p10-0.core01.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.230]
11   356 ms   289 ms   288 ms  v3801.na22.b003123-1.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com [38.20.33.242]
12   292 ms   292 ms   321 ms  38.104.140.46
13   288 ms   289 ms   288 ms  208.67.219.137

Trace complete.

lol funky, I know how to do a tracert, but thanks :mellow:

Here it is:

C:\>tracert www.skylinesaustralia.com

Tracing route to www.skylinesaustralia.com [209.62.28.18]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms **** [10.0.0.1]

2 70 ms 69 ms 69 ms loop0.lns3.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

3 69 ms 82 ms 73 ms gi0-3.cor1.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

4 269 ms 367 ms 269 ms pos2-2.bdr1.syd7.internode.on.net [150.101.180.29]

5 269 ms 270 ms 269 ms pos4-1.bdr1.sjc2.internode.on.net [203.16.213.49]

6 * 296 ms 297 ms ge-3-7.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.97]

7 297 ms 296 ms 297 ms ae-2.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.9]

8 281 ms 295 ms 280 ms as-0.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.97]

9 280 ms 301 ms 280 ms ae-0.r21.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.34]

10 342 ms 342 ms 366 ms as-0.r21.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.122]

11 318 ms 322 ms 322 ms ae-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.24]

12 344 ms 344 ms 348 ms xe-4-1.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.229]

13 342 ms 399 ms 340 ms ge-9.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.134]

14 343 ms 341 ms 338 ms gphou2-209-85-0-105.ev1servers.net [209.85.0.105]

15 340 ms 344 ms 341 ms www.skylinesaustralia.com [209.62.28.18]

Trace complete.

The entire trace took about 20 seconds to complete. Thats a lot longer than any other trace.

What are your thoughts?

Edited by The Mafia

Here is another - worse too

Tracing route to www.skylinesaustralia.com [209.62.28.18]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ***** [10.0.0.1]

2 97 ms 83 ms 69 ms loop0.lns3.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

3 137 ms 217 ms 245 ms gi0-3.cor1.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

4 270 ms 304 ms 272 ms pos2-2.bdr1.syd7.internode.on.net [150.101.180.29]

5 298 ms 282 ms 284 ms pos4-1.bdr1.sjc2.internode.on.net [203.16.213.49]

6 302 ms 296 ms 295 ms ge-3-7.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.97]

7 297 ms 341 ms 296 ms ae-2.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.9]

8 300 ms 287 ms 291 ms as-0.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.97]

9 281 ms 281 ms 331 ms ae-0.r21.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.34]

10 368 ms 410 ms 376 ms as-0.r21.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.122]

11 322 ms 321 ms 321 ms ae-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.24]

12 359 ms 422 ms 348 ms xe-4-1.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.229]

13 341 ms 344 ms 342 ms ge-9.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.134]

14 348 ms 350 ms 344 ms gphou2-209-85-0-105.ev1servers.net [209.85.0.105]

15 339 ms 339 ms 344 ms www.skylinesaustralia.com [209.62.28.18]

Trace complete.

Edited by The Mafia

lol whoops, glossed over the "i'm in IT" bit.

hmm that's a bit odd. I've got a couple of other sites hosted with EV1 in a different datacentre (I think), can you do a tracert on www.j-spec.com.au ? just want to see if its across the board for EV1 (thePlanet) servers

C:\>tracert www.j-spec.com.au

Tracing route to www.j-spec.com.au [67.15.56.51]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms [10.0.0.1]

2 116 ms 69 ms 134 ms loop0.lns3.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

3 75 ms 69 ms 69 ms gi0-3.cor1.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

4 269 ms 328 ms 316 ms pos6-0.bdr1.syd7.internode.on.net [203.16.212.25]

5 341 ms 269 ms 305 ms pos2-0.bdr1.sjc2.internode.on.net [203.16.213.41]

6 270 ms 269 ms * ge-3-7.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.97]

7 270 ms 269 ms 299 ms ae-2.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.9]

8 253 ms 253 ms 256 ms as-0.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.97]

9 257 ms 253 ms 253 ms ae-0.r21.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.34]

10 420 ms 343 ms 315 ms as-0.r21.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.122]

11 317 ms 324 ms 367 ms xe-4-1.r04.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.231]

12 280 ms 294 ms 287 ms ge-6.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.10.190]

13 294 ms 289 ms 289 ms gphou-66-98-241-29.ev1servers.net [66.98.241.29]

14 315 ms 315 ms 318 ms gphou-66-98-240-123.ev1servers.net [66.98.240.123]

15 285 ms 394 ms 279 ms ev1s-67-15-56-51.ev1servers.net [67.15.56.51]

Trace complete.

C:\>

this is getting REALLY bad.

From clicking on my SAU shortcut, it takes 22 seconds to completely load http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums

And it takes forever to reply to a topic when you select reply.

Any more idea on why the site is really slow? Its not my internet connection - I'm downloading at 800k sec, and every other site I connect to is about 100 times faster, most in the US too.

we've moved servers to the US (previously the SQL data was hosted in Australia and the image server was in the US), which means there's more hops than there used to be with the old server.

ATM, we're hosting with EV1/theplanet, who are supposed to have one of the biggest backbones in the US, but it'll still be a tad delayed as the server's running at max load and because of the number of hops.

C:\>tracert www.skylinesaustralia.com

Tracing route to www.skylinesaustralia.com [209.62.28.18]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms **** [10.0.0.1]

2 70 ms 69 ms 69 ms loop0.lns3.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

3 69 ms 82 ms 73 ms gi0-3.cor1.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

4 269 ms 367 ms 269 ms pos2-2.bdr1.syd7.internode.on.net [150.101.180.29]

5 269 ms 270 ms 269 ms pos4-1.bdr1.sjc2.internode.on.net [203.16.213.49]

6 * 296 ms 297 ms ge-3-7.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.97]

7 297 ms 296 ms 297 ms ae-2.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.9]

8 281 ms 295 ms 280 ms as-0.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.97]

9 280 ms 301 ms 280 ms ae-0.r21.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.34]

10 342 ms 342 ms 366 ms as-0.r21.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.122]

11 318 ms 322 ms 322 ms ae-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.24]

12 344 ms 344 ms 348 ms xe-4-1.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.229]

13 342 ms 399 ms 340 ms ge-9.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.134]

14 343 ms 341 ms 338 ms gphou2-209-85-0-105.ev1servers.net [209.85.0.105]

15 340 ms 344 ms 341 ms www.skylinesaustralia.com [209.62.28.18]

Trace complete.

Tracing route to www.skylinesaustralia.com [209.62.28.18]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ***** [10.0.0.1]

2 97 ms 83 ms 69 ms loop0.lns3.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

3 137 ms 217 ms 245 ms gi0-3.cor1.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

4 270 ms 304 ms 272 ms pos2-2.bdr1.syd7.internode.on.net [150.101.180.29]

5 298 ms 282 ms 284 ms pos4-1.bdr1.sjc2.internode.on.net [203.16.213.49]

6 302 ms 296 ms 295 ms ge-3-7.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.97]

7 297 ms 341 ms 296 ms ae-2.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.9]

8 300 ms 287 ms 291 ms as-0.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.97]

9 281 ms 281 ms 331 ms ae-0.r21.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.34]

10 368 ms 410 ms 376 ms as-0.r21.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.122]

11 322 ms 321 ms 321 ms ae-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.24]

12 359 ms 422 ms 348 ms xe-4-1.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.229]

13 341 ms 344 ms 342 ms ge-9.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.134]

14 348 ms 350 ms 344 ms gphou2-209-85-0-105.ev1servers.net [209.85.0.105]

15 339 ms 339 ms 344 ms www.skylinesaustralia.com [209.62.28.18]

Trace complete.

C:\>tracert www.j-spec.com.au

Tracing route to www.j-spec.com.au [67.15.56.51]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms [10.0.0.1]

2 116 ms 69 ms 134 ms loop0.lns3.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

3 75 ms 69 ms 69 ms gi0-3.cor1.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

4 269 ms 328 ms 316 ms pos6-0.bdr1.syd7.internode.on.net [203.16.212.25]

5 341 ms 269 ms 305 ms pos2-0.bdr1.sjc2.internode.on.net [203.16.213.41]

6 270 ms 269 ms * ge-3-7.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.97]

7 270 ms 269 ms 299 ms ae-2.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.9]

8 253 ms 253 ms 256 ms as-0.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.97]

9 257 ms 253 ms 253 ms ae-0.r21.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.34]

10 420 ms 343 ms 315 ms as-0.r21.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.122]

11 317 ms 324 ms 367 ms xe-4-1.r04.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.231]

12 280 ms 294 ms 287 ms ge-6.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.10.190]

13 294 ms 289 ms 289 ms gphou-66-98-241-29.ev1servers.net [66.98.241.29]

14 315 ms 315 ms 318 ms gphou-66-98-240-123.ev1servers.net [66.98.240.123]

15 285 ms 394 ms 279 ms ev1s-67-15-56-51.ev1servers.net [67.15.56.51]

Trace complete.

1st trace

4 269 ms 367 ms 269 ms pos2-2.bdr1.syd7.internode.on.net [150.101.180.29]

2nd trace

3 137 ms 217 ms 245 ms gi0-3.cor1.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

3rd trace

2 116 ms 69 ms 134 ms loop0.lns3.bne4.internode.on.net [150.101.0.0]

4 269 ms 328 ms 316 ms pos6-0.bdr1.syd7.internode.on.net [203.16.212.25]

From what i can see you seem to be running into problems with the internode host...

Is this a problem that has only recently started happening, where it was fine before??? Or its always been like this??? Are you using the same ISP at work?

Can you try a tracert on www.disney.com and see what that returns....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...