Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

from ferni's first link

Different materials coefficient of thermal conductivity

Air 0.025

Aluminum 220

Titanium 7.4-22.0 (Depending on alloy and temp) Usually roughly equivalent to Stainless Steel.

Steel 46

Stainless Steel 15

Copper 401

Concrete 1.0

Glass 1.1

Rubber 0.16

Wood 0.04-0.4

Cork 0.05

Ti and stainless steel are roughly equivalent. What are the factory ones made from?

I call magic beans. get some hardwood pads :O

Somebody get me some drawings and I can get them cut up, in whatever thickness and material you want.

How would determine the effectiveness of the different materials?

sounds good, but I reckon buy the time we buy some titanium sheet in the right thickness, then your time to cut them out, and we need 2 per caliper I reckon even if you did it at cost and donated your time free it would be a $100 proposition. what do you reckon pete? I don't even know anywhere that sells titanium sheet.

lol, and I don't know much to begin with either.

alright, I'll hold off on sending my money to seppos for the moment. If I'm not too lazy tonigt i'll trace out one of the factory brembo shims for you. and if you feel inclined sus out what Ti sheet is worth. I'm not sure on thickness? maybe 1mm or 1.5mm.

I think it's going to end up costing about the same Richard. So we might be better of ordering from the states... but we can wait until tomorrow to see what Pete and Troy come up with...

Here is the thing people. You need to be sure you are getting the correct grade of titanium.

I have a little backing plate that i drew up because i was going to do this for my std caliper. There are a few little touches i added to mine that are different to theirs. The reality is you are talking bees dicks here but if there are a few tweaks that add to the thermal capcity of your brakes then you can get a lot out of them. You only have to look at production cars and see how hard they get punted and appreciate that there std equipment is often worse then what Nissan gives our Skylines.

So the reason i didnt go through with this was because i couldnt find the right grade of titanium, one with plenty of vanadium in it. But that came back to mostly care factor, i just didnt have the time or interest to see it through.

I also had my calipers HPC coated with the pistons coated in the same treatment as used on exhaust housings and manifolds. Again , probably a small gain...but a gain none the less. I know for what my brakes have held up well on the track.

You could also be a real die hard and try to run different caliper pistons, but that was just hits and giggles. You would have to be mad to take that upon yourself as you dont want to be R&Ding this sort of caliper mod on the street or track :O But again, its something that could be done to a std caliper...but lets face it...at this point the sloppy / shitty std caliper will be deflectings its little heart out giving you crap pedal feel well before these sorts of lengths give you any real benefit

Just quickly, i have always had an idea that i wanted to try but never measured. If someone has soem new pads arounf can they measure the total depth of the pad and the the available space between the rotor face and piston when fully retracted

So it looks like the correct FMSI for GTR Brembo's up front is D647. takspeed have this listed under their D960 shim.

http://www.takspeed.com/tispeed/index.php?...;products_id=40

PDF of the shim D960 Shim attatched to scale, i checked it against a set of my pads and it looks right.

Think i'm going to order a set of these. Hopefully get them before PIARC on 20th.

brakeshim_D960.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...