Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

aaron has again disappointed me.

ive just received an email saying that he didnt want me to take it to GCG for them to strip the turbo, and this has voided my warranty.

i have no option than to sue, right?

Wait on, who told you to go to GCG in the first place?

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Wait on, who told you to go to GCG in the first place?
after hearing that a friend of mine had his sliding turbo fail, the oil problem really started to worry me, so i pulled it off and sent it to GCG under aaron's instructions, as he told my friend to do also.
Edited by abu
Wait on, who told you to go to GCG in the first place?

aaron did.

he specifically told me to go to GCG, this is the exact line he used from our msn conversation.

bits were removed as to not let too much of aaron's situation out.

10/09/2007 12:36:27 AM Aaron Joe Rulz... are you able to take it off and take it to gcg to see what they think?

10/09/2007 12:37:58 AM Aaron Joe Rulz... well when you can take it off and send it to gcg and let jase know

10/09/2007 12:38:35 AM Joe Rulz... Aaron so i take it to gcg, then what?

10/09/2007 12:39:06 AM Aaron Joe Rulz... see what the prob is and let jase know

10/09/2007 12:39:18 AM Aaron Joe Rulz... if something has failed he will organise replacement

10/09/2007 12:39:32 AM Joe Rulz... Aaron how dude?

10/09/2007 12:39:44 AM Aaron Joe Rulz... organise through gcg

Common man, fair go... Slide was offering a cheap service and he's offering to repair the turbo for you. I wouldn't sue but that's me, how do you know it wasn't how you installed it or oil line mods that made the turbo fail?!?!

I've got a slide hiflow, no complaints. I'm sure proportionally the amount that have failed to the amount that have not would favour heavily towards not failing.

MO

Hi Guys

Our warranty procedure is pretty clear in that the item must be returned back to base for any work to be done.

The item is still under warranty Joe and warranty on the turbocharger is still available though in most circumstances if the turbo has been pulled down alot of things can be changed that in the repair would not usually be viewable and this would generally void warranty.

The turbocharger had been sent back to the shop before where it was pulled down and there was no problems at all other then reported.

We advised that you take the turbo to a local shop as you did not want to send it all the way up to the shop in QLD for us to view it for it to only be reported that it was not faulty as it was last time as you needed your car on the road.

If GCG have advised that a repair is required then under warranty Murnane Motors must be the shop to do the repair to it.

All warranty return procedures are listed on the website and have been there since its inception.

You have been advised via email on the warranty procedure.

If you would like a refund on the item then that is available for the purchase price less postage and housings as advised also via email to retrieve from Murnane Motors which i doubt would be a problem though if you just ask the manufacturer im sure they would give you a straight answer.

It does seem as if you just don't want to send the turbo back.

The warranty procedures are common practice amongst all manufacturers in that they must be returned to the manufacturer for repair.

Thanks, Aaron

Common man, fair go... Slide was offering a cheap service and he's offering to repair the turbo for you. I wouldn't sue but that's me, how do you know it wasn't how you installed it or oil line mods that made the turbo fail?!?!

I've got a slide hiflow, no complaints. I'm sure proportionally the amount that have failed to the amount that have not would favour heavily towards not failing.

MO

if it was a way that i installed it then there would be scores on the shaft from oil starvation, or oil contamination. GCG have stated that there is no scoring or oil contamination.

i've installed plenty of these turbos and have not gone wrong.

he just told me by email that my warranty is VOID because GCG had opened up the turbo.

wheres the fair go?

Hi Guys

Our warranty procedure is pretty clear in that the item must be returned back to base for any work to be done.

The item is still under warranty Joe and warranty on the turbocharger is still available though in most circumstances if the turbo has been pulled down alot of things can be changed that in the repair would not usually be viewable and this would generally void warranty.

The turbocharger had been sent back to the shop before where it was pulled down and there was no problems at all other then reported.

We advised that you take the turbo to a local shop as you did not want to send it all the way up to the shop in QLD for us to view it for it to only be reported that it was not faulty as it was last time as you needed your car on the road.

If GCG have advised that a repair is required then under warranty Murnane Motors must be the shop to do the repair to it.

All warranty return procedures are listed on the website and have been there since its inception.

You have been advised via email on the warranty procedure.

If you would like a refund on the item then that is available for the purchase price less postage and housings as advised also via email.

The warranty procedures are common practice amongst all manufacturers in that they must be returned to the manufacturer for repair.

Thanks, Aaron

you told me to take it to GCG because you have no workshop. i have you telling me this in an msn conversation which i kept the logs of (and which i removed from the conversation i pasted above).

i have no problems with them doing the repair as i said earlier, but you told me that i pretty much voided my warranty by having GCG inspect the turbo WHICH YOU ADVISED ME TO DO.

Aren't these turbos sold as 'Sliding Performance'? shouldn't they be warranted by 'Sliding Performance'?

No wonder Joe doesn't want to send it to Murnane when 1 - he's never heard of them before, up until today 2 - his contract is with SP and 3 - they've 'repaired' it once already!

Aren't these turbos sold as 'Sliding Performance'? shouldn't they be warranted by 'Sliding Performance'?

No wonder Joe doesn't want to send it to Murnane when 1 - he's never heard of them before, up until today 2 - his contract is with SP and 3 - they've 'repaired' it once already!

thats exactly how i feel.

ive never heard of these guys before today. my last repair i sent my turbo to aaron himself.

thats why im a bit reluctant on sending it.

if HKS came up one day and said, 'ok, we actually dont build our branded turbos, k-mart does'. how would you feel?

so send to slide and they will forward it on

sounds like your angry about the sit and not thinking straight get the thing fixed for free and resell it

I dont see how you'll loose any cash apart from postage the $75 and second install time

which probably adds up to under $300 is it really worth the agro

Im sure if you stop trying to play hardball slide will to

funny you only got the email about voiding warranty after you mention consumer affairs and sueing

Edited by 1400r

Just a bit out of the blue here but Slide are the Seller just like if my Panasonic copier craps itself, panasonic dont fix it the repair agent does (not panasonic), just like if a Sony tape drive fails i send it back to a company in brisbane (not sony) for them to repair it.

This procedure of sending the Turbo back to Murnan is normal, thats who built it thats who needs to fix it, if slide sell the turbo as a "slide turbo" thats fine, warranty Can if they choose go to slide then they send it onto Murnane, its quicker for you to send it to these guys directly.

As for the whole sueing bit, the only obligation slide would have to you is to send your turbo back to Murnane thats it, for warranty repair, if you have not as of yet sent it to them there is no case, I can see you would be annoyed if Aaron told you to take it to gcg withour telling you that you would ware the cost or it may void warranty, that is a big mistake if this is true.

Send it back get it repaired under warranty, make sure they know who you are in case you have future issues, share your concerns with murnane so you know they will take extra care on the job and if it craps itself again then you have a case to get a refund (maybe not full) or call fair trading, but you must give the normal warranty procedures a go first.

And most good jap parts are now made in china buy a guy paid $1.43 a week working out of his barn with his wife lol (quality aint what it used to be)

Edited by Mark0

Don't you have a one off, one of a kind 34 type hi-flow with a larger exhaust housing? Or was that someone else...

Either way, I reckon take the list from GCG, get a free fix under warranty, have GCG check it out at the end...

But sup to you really...

thats exactly how i feel.

ive never heard of these guys before today. my last repair i sent my turbo to aaron himself.

thats why im a bit reluctant on sending it.

if HKS came up one day and said, 'ok, we actually dont build our branded turbos, k-mart does'. how would you feel?

HKS dont build thier turbos, Garrett does and HKS markets them..same deal here Slide markets them and the other mob makes them but yeah sonds like a screw around I would be wanting my cash back too and be done with it

HKS dont build thier turbos, Garrett does and HKS markets them..same deal here Slide markets them and the other mob makes them but yeah sonds like a screw around I would be wanting my cash back too and be done with it

yeah but you got what i mean, right? its just a shit go.

i want a refund. but the turbo is in pieces at GCG and i dont think aaron is willing to have it returned like that.

yeah but you got what i mean, right? its just a shit go.

i want a refund. but the turbo is in pieces at GCG and i dont think aaron is willing to have it returned like that.

yeah man thats not real good hey

yea lol like the time i complained my hiflow wouldnt line up and i had to line up the housings.

And i was at fault for "bending the oil lines". load of crap. now im "banned from dealing with sliding performance" lmao. like i care..

want real service talk to Amec :wub:

cheap and reliable turbos too :cool:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...