Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After reading pages after pages of technical information on the engine, transmission, aerodynamic, suspension, electrics etc etc, it seems that the fine engineers at Nissan have covered every base. You have an insanely fast car thats capable of cruising at 300km/h at the same time, quiet enough to hold a conversation (dont' know why you would at that speed). It has a great set of suspension that can handle any condition with ease. The engine is up there with all the other supercars in the world. Overall, they seemed to have put together a perfect package that's going to be hard to improve upon, any alternation is more likely to disturb the balance of the car.

It seems there's nothing left to mod and if there is anything left to mod, it would be very expensive. The exhaust mods would cost twice as much now that there's two. Changing the turbos would be even more costly, as the manifold is now actually built into the turbo. Any change in the turbo would require a replacement manifold as well. That two of everything again. Going big singles is......quite impossible?? considering the turbos are now on both sides of the car. With so much electronics in the suspension, is it going to have any improvements if you change it to a more harder coilover for example? How will the electronic system adapt to that? I'm also sure many have thought about aftermarket kit designs to make the car look more aggresive. Having read some of the pretty picture Nissan put up about the aerodynamics of the body panels, how will aftermarket parts affect that.

I almost forgot to mention the wheels. The wheels are 20" in diameter with run flats which means you don't need a spare in the boot. With a wheel size this big, most 18-19" aftermarket wheels will fit but most likely won't look as good going down a size. The tyres themselves is a problem when it comes to doing any modification. Any tyres you get will have to be in 20" rubber and if you are going on the safe side, you'd want run flats as well. I don't think its going to be cheap getting 20" tyres.

Will the new GTR going to have that much tuning potential left after Nissan doing such a thorough job of it? Will it end up being like a run of the mill supercars you see on the streets? Or will the crazy Japanese tuners come up with more crazy ideas?

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm sure many people felt the same way when the R32 was released back in 1989. But they found ways to improve it.

At the very least, there will be people who will want their GTR to do 10 second 1/4 miles (and some will want 9's, maybe 8's). Thats how the aftermarket gets started.

ok we'll u have some good points there but it only makes 353kw. as for turbo upgrades... most ppl change manifolds anyway!

and it is a 3.8lt so u could go for a pair of pretty big turbos and not worry too much about lag. the exhaust will be expensive coz theres 2 of them??? lol 300zx's also run twins.. big deal

If u can afford to buy a gtr then u can afford to modify it with ease. twin exhaust isnt that expensive anyway.

most ppl wouldnt touch the suspension as its low enough as well as hard enough for anything u throw at it including circuit work because thats where it was tweaked.

Rubber... well it runs 20's and the wheels are gorgeous.. so why bother changin those.

If your going to race it then u could improve every aspect of the car. :P

for starters that bonnet and exhaust needs to be changed with better lightweight stuff. full titanium exhausts are already being developed.

then there's the bodykits... from what I've read a whole heap of potential owners would prefer the front bumper style of the Proto over the production model.

Not to mention guys who wanna develop stroker kits and people who want more power.

besides... emissions compliance is for people who like warranties... i'm sure once you rip out half the shit in that car which allows it to meet the gay American emissions standards you'd have a car that breathes a lot better.

I bet Rays have some special 20" TE37s being made up. :P

Anyway if you can buy Gembella, Alpina, RUF etc parts for European performance cars I don't see why the GTR will be un-moddable.

Mod parts will definitely cost more though but as Bumblebee said "If u can afford to buy a gtr then u can afford to modify it with ease."

And lets not forget about our fine friends at nismo, im sure theyre already going over it.
I agree, they probably are getting theirs dropped off at the workshop as we speak :O

nismoix7.jpg

:sorcerer:

Nismo will have something for us at the festival I'm sure!

you can be sure nismo have been involved in the car for years. even HSV work along side holden on new bommodores.

but remember when the 32 first came out it was all mild looks and mods at first. It took almost 15 years before a t04z was the must have accessory for your gtr.

There's people out there who mod, Ferrari's, Porches and Lambos in increasing numbers, so why would the GTR be any different. If you have 150k to drop on a GTR, then you have the $$'s for mods.

Wheels shouldn't be a problem as RAYS make many 19",20" inch wheels already.

It is too soon to call.

Wait for the N1 version of the GTR and then we can all just STFU!

I am sure Nismo will release there version which will just kick it off BIG TIME. The race to mod one will be on with all the Japanese workshops probably already ordered a few to tweak.

I wonder how much wieght they can rip out of it. When I think about it, even ripping out all the Luxuries it still would be heavier than a R33 in stock trim. Theres gotta be some things really causing the massive weight.

I wonder how much that dsg box weighs.

First mods that i would look at (please god one day...) would be weight reduction CF body components and the like. Im sure once it gets into touring car racing there will be a whole bunch of race tested mods that will filter through into the general market.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...