Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb26dett Vs Vr3.8tt ?!

bkc

By bkc,
in R35 GTR

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

GTS4WD Grand Master

GTS4WD

Posted
Posted (edited)

The only thing That would come ANYWHERE NEAR the VR is a Z-tune..

Even then, it would still get is arse handed to it..

or.. would it?

Yes the GTR has titanium this.. bollocks that.. electronic jizz control..

But the Z-tune is still pretty hardcore!..

I mean Nimso poured 5mm of Carbon fiber on the floor plan to stiffen it it..

it uses a the GT500 race engine..

Carbon fiber pannels all round..

10.04 or something like that quarter mile..

Same power.. not sure about torque..

I think the Z-tune is ligher..

The gear changes wont be as quick in the Z-tune as in the GTR.. but.. could a Z-tune make up for this?

hmm.. discuss.. im curious..

Edited by GTS4WD
JAGR33 Grand Master

JAGR33

Posted
Posted
I am almost sure, I think perhaps if the work to upgrade the engine RB26DETT much better than the engine VR38DETT! !

Because LINE ENGINE IS BETTER FROM V ENGINE !!!!!!!!!

In what way?? Have you seen someone modify the VR38 yet??

And what makes you say an inline motor is better than a V engine??

A 'V' engine is much stronger and stiffer than an inline engine...

Can you back up your comments with facts???

It be appreciated muchly from you.... :thumbsup:

djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
Posted
In what way?? Have you seen someone modify the VR38 yet??

And what makes you say an inline motor is better than a V engine??

A 'V' engine is much stronger and stiffer than an inline engine...

Can you back up your comments with facts???

It be appreciated muchly from you.... :yes:

The unfortunately reality is that the inline 6 has probably had its day. The packaging benefits of the V6 makes them a better proposition for the run of the mill car companies - particularly those running transverse installations. Even in longitudinal ones the gains are there in making the car easier to engineer for crash worthiness.

But to defend the old inline six (Which I have a soft spot for) they have the following advantages over their bent up brethren:

* Inherent first and second order balance - the V6's either run funny vee angles or need an extra balance shaft.

* Easier packaging when you turbo charge the motor.

* More room on the axhaust side which allows better cooling for the turbo chargers etc.

* Cheaper head castings as you only need two cam shafts & on head.

* They sound much nicer.

KISIN Veteran

KISIN

Posted
Posted

how easy would it be to take out the TT setup and throw in a, lets say T51R SPL onto an engine like that (VR)? Maybe compare it to a 300zx engine...I have never had experience with that...is there enough space...how does it all compare to throwing a t51r on a 26 ?

bkc Community Regular

bkc

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
In what way?? Have you seen someone modify the VR38 yet??

And what makes you say an inline motor is better than a V engine??

A 'V' engine is much stronger and stiffer than an inline engine...

Can you back up your comments with facts???

It be appreciated muchly from you.... :(

================================================================

I have no experience with the engine VR38DETT to you that expectation proved largely true! !

Despite the dramatic difference in STROKER! !

But in terms of the experience of the RB20DET and RB25DET and RB26DETT is better in all respects use or promotion or maintenance or endurance is much better too! ! !

There is no engine V6 6 Slander advantage proved successful only relatively Tourqu be a little better and I say this advantage! ! !

But respects mentioned above inline much better health and days will prove myself! ! Despite the size difference stroker !!!!!!!

NOTE: inline engine only for the 6 slander !! V ENGINE GOOD ON THE V8 ONLY !! OR MORE!!!

Thanks ALL .[/b][/size] :yes:

Edited by bkc
NISMO Grand Master

NISMO

Posted
Posted
The only thing That would come ANYWHERE NEAR the VR is a Z-tune..

Even then, it would still get is arse handed to it..

or.. would it?

Yes the GTR has titanium this.. bollocks that..

But the Z-tune is still pretty hardcore!.. I mean Nimso poured 5mm of Carbon fiber on the floor plan to stiffen it it.. it uses a the 500 race engine.. Carbon fiber pannels all round.. 10.04 or something like that quarter mile..

Same power.. not sure about torque.. I think the Z-tune is ligher..

The gear changes wont be as quick in the Z-tune as in the GTR.. but.. could a Z-tune make up for this?

hmm.. discuss.. im curious..

What race engine are you referring to?

If it's the GT500 from SuperGT, then your probably wrong, cause they have been using a V engine in these for many years in the 350Z and a few seasons in the R34's before that.

If it's the GT500 engine from way back when the R34's first came out( In JGTC), then that's a pretty old engine, and I'd still take the VR over it any day.

Amir Rising Star

Amir

Posted
Posted
The only thing That would come ANYWHERE NEAR the VR is a Z-tune..

Even then, it would still get is arse handed to it..

or.. would it?

Yes the GTR has titanium this.. bollocks that..

But the Z-tune is still pretty hardcore!.. I mean Nimso poured 5mm of Carbon fiber on the floor plan to stiffen it it.. it uses a the 500 race engine.. Carbon fiber pannels all round.. 10.04 or something like that quarter mile..

Same power.. not sure about torque.. I think the Z-tune is ligher..

The gear changes wont be as quick in the Z-tune as in the GTR.. but.. could a Z-tune make up for this?

hmm.. discuss.. im curious..

the z-tune costs a lot more and will be a collectors item. The R35 will be mass produced. If I was to chose b/w to two, Id go the z-tune.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...