Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There are plenty of threads with the information you're after. A quick search will find them easy.

To give you an idea of how they're on fuel, people usually say, "If you're worried about fuel, the skyline is the wrong car for you."

I get 380-400kms from a tank around town, and about 450 or more out on the highway, but I have not used a full tank on a highway trip yet so can't give an acurate answer.

Not a chance in hell I'm driving on a dirt road at more than 5km/h

In the rain....woooooo....Very slippery!!!! might need different tyres but it doesn't rain much.

My opinion is get a cheap GTS (No turbo) to learn in then upgrade later. Not so bad if you ding a pole or something. This can also give you more of an appreciation of the turbo power instead of just taking it for granted and being sadly disappointed when you drive something else.

Don't forget the more you pay for the initial cost of the car,,the more it will cost to maintain..(as a general rule to allow for budget.)

i'm new to this forum and thinking of purchasing a r33 gts-t skyline. i wanted to know what they are like on fuel and handling for a beginner, like rain, dirt etc. daily driving. cheers

Dirt?..................no.

Handling is good for a standard car, but it can be improved....a lot.

This link will help you find the answers to many of your questions.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/search.html&f=7

Edited by KeyMaker

Fuel costs for me are the same as my other car a vp commodore, so I'd say fairly poor economy (mainly due to a crap tune).

A stock gts-t handles really well for what you pay for one these days. If it's got a fair few km's on it new shocks/springs are probably on the cards and a decent set of tyres go a long way. Overall a good car for a beginner into performance cars, plenty of people will give you shit for owning a 33 gts-t, but I believe they're a well balanced, relatively powerful sports car at a budget price, so you can't really go wrong.

fuel - car will drink as much as your right foot dictates.

dirt... well, you don't drive skylines on dirt, mate

rain, again depends on how heavy your right foot is. I've found myself sideways at a 100km/h while trying to overtake, but then again, it's much quicker through the corners in the wet than say, a commodore or falcon. It also depends on which tyres you have on.

you don't buy a line with your head, cos if you think about it, if you're after a cost effective purchase, an older "performance" car is probably the stupidest thing you can buy.

stick with hyundais

mine is good on fuel, it all comes down to how you drive it, when i was workin down town ways i would put $30 in and it would last nearly a week, but i noticed when late for work i would use nearly $30 in a day!

i was told when on the highway (cruizin) to keep an eye on my boost gauge and keep it under a certain PSI (not labouring the motor), meaning i have to basically have my foot nearly off the accelerator or hovering, but does make a diff even though it sounds rediculus :(

also it might come down to mods too, as i have bigger injectors, bigger turbo, bigger fuel pump bla bla bla...

but ultimatly if your worried about fuel... get a daewoo

I have only an exhaust on my R33 Gts-t and I get anywhere between 380-500kms to a tank depending on my driving. It's pretty good fuel economy for a turbo car. Once you find out how much fun it can be to drive a Skyline turbo, you soon tend to forget about fuel anyway. :) I have found it is very comfortable to take over long distances too which is always a plus.

i'm new to this forum and thinking of purchasing a r33 gts-t skyline. i wanted to know what they are like on fuel and handling for a beginner, like rain, dirt etc. daily driving. cheers

LOL buy 1 and find out every1s answer will be different if u got a heavy foot like me then petrol will get used quite quickly 40 to 50 bucks in a day easy

LOL buy 1 and find out every1s answer will be different if u got a heavy foot like me then petrol will get used quite quickly 40 to 50 bucks in a day easy

You must have your foot glued to the floor if you are spending that sort of money in a day on fuel. It sounds like your car is way over-due for a tune.

In all reality, as with any car, fuel use is dictated by how heavy your right foot is. It's no different in a Skyline.

You must have your foot glued to the floor if you are spending that sort of money in a day on fuel. It sounds like your car is way over-due for a tune.

In all reality, as with any car, fuel use is dictated by how heavy your right foot is. It's no different in a Skyline.

what can i say i do alot ove small trips here and there then there very busy and when ur on south rd stoping and go stop and go u chew petrol true or not i dont have a heavy heavy foot i just drive alot for work.

ps ive had 100k service 2 weeks ago 175rwkw at 5psi hasnt missed a beat so u can say what u want when u havent seen my car i bet ur car is way over due for a tune lol glued to the floor bahaaaaa and i agree with the fuel use dictated by how heavy u drive etc but what about traffic small trips excess fuel usage y/n. :)

9.3L/100km on the freeway. If I drive like a grandma around town I get about 10.5L/100km. Normal driving (mm boost) is somewhere around 12L/100km.

That's pretty bloody good for a performance car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...