Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So has anybody found a 17/16 BMC that is 3 port for non ABS? I dont want to run a Patrol BMC as i read its larger and its already tight in there and different size will affect the Cusco stopper i run.

LOL, so, i am thinking i may just buy a BM57 rebuild kit and bore out the BM44 i run. Two kill birds with the same stone :)

  • 7 months later...

I had a look at a BMC on a Patrol today. I want to confirm that the one that we are talking about with-out the proportioning valve has two outlets.

Also, I assume that the bias controller will simply be fitted in line between the BMC outlet and the line running back to the rears? Thanks, Ben.

  • 8 months later...

Bump for great justice. Can't find any listing of brake masters on greenline.jp.

I have a gts-4 with Rb26 and GT-R Sumitomos. I have ABS with no gt-r booster (aside from the unit that bolts in between master and pedal)....

ARGH..

So VIN isn't going to match up, I have no idea which size to get, and no idea where to get it from ^_^. Please help.

It currently has a 'BM50' unit from tokico on it which started leaking very badly today and is marooned at the mechanics workshop.

Given this is the third master I have had problems with.. i'm very surprised there isn't more information on new units. Especially when opinion seems split 50/50 as to the value of a rebuild.

  • 1 year later...

Gotta revive this one, sorry guys. I bought an R34 BMC (supposedly), ABS (2 ports) for my R32 gtr last year. Went to install it and fits great HOWEVER the level sensor wire connector is on the left side, not the right and is a different style connector. It's a 17/16 BMC with a black cap. Is this something that's easy to fix? Can't seem to find what kind of connector I need. According to the part number I could find, I think it's an R33 gtr BMC. Anyways, what should I do? I need fluid level protection.

  • 4 weeks later...

This is to the best of my understanding. The R32 Gt-R's with Sumitomo callipers had 1" BMCs according to the shop manual. Brembo equipped R32's had 17/16's BMCs. N1's with Sumitomos (Or Nismo versions if you like) has 15/16's with no ABS & Brembo equipped N1's had 1" BMC's. Cars without ABS have 3 outlet BMC's.

Brake master cylinders for R32 Gt-R's.

Part numbers are stamped on the end of the master cylinder. There appears to have been two different part numbers available for most build dates. This may be as simple as Nissan sourcing master cylinders from two different manufacturers - Tokico & Nabco.

Stock model:

Build dates from 8908 to 8911

Part number 46010-05U20

Size 1"

Build dates from 8911 to 9108

Part number 46010-05U00

Size 1"

Build dates from 9108 on

Part number 46010-05U20

Part number 46010-05U00

Size 1"

V-Spec model, ie with Brembo brakes.

Build dates from 9302 on

Part number 46010-05U02

Size 17/16's.

N1 versions.

This gets confusing & may well be incomplete.

Early version appear to have 15/16" master cylinder sizes. I would guess (Note: NOT SURE) that they may well have three outlets rather than the normal two for stock GT-R's & have Sumitomo callipers. The number of ports relates to the presence of ABS. 2 ports for ABS, 3 for Non ABS. n Interestingly they appear to be smaller in size than their equivalent ABS equipped stock or V-spec GT-R's.

Any way:

Build dates 9002 to 9108

Part number 46010-02U00

Build date 9108 on

Part number 46010-02U00

The specification is listed differently for these units but is in Japanese on the spec sheet & I can't read it.

The alternate parts listed are here

Build dates 9002 to 9108

Part number 46010-02U20

Build date 9108 on

Part number 46010-02U20

Later versions had a 1" size.

Build date 9203 on

Part number 46010-05U01 for a Tokico unit.

Part number 46010-05U21 for a Nabco unit.

There may well be more options but that is the limit of my knowledge at present.

Hi guys have a search for a page from nissan fast, NFA051, this covers 5/89 to 2/93 this may help out on the part number issue for the brake master it also shows alternate part number but unfortunatly not clear on abs presant or not. :cheers:

Edited by nobby

They aren't anything special. Just Project Mu sized for a 33 R. The fronts only weigh 0.5 kg heavier for the pair than the rears. But you can't get any hatted back rotors for sensible money. Also the vanes on the rear are, for whatever reason, more substantial & numerous than for the fronts. No idea why that is but I stopped asking such questions after I got sick of the local stuff cracking.

Hi mate you will proberly find that the rear of the car has more trouble getting air to the brakes, under my 32 bleeding brakes recently and recon there's alot more in the way at the back to block the flow.

What air there is making it to the rear proberly has some degree of heat in it from up front, thats my guess.

A std 32gtr also has air ducts and/or possibly a deflector directing air up front to help.

Front are thicker and can soak up more heat.

"think of thick and thin saucepans, which more easly burns ya tucker and gets uneven heat distrabution" same could be said for rotors.

And then theres the added benifet of less unsprung weight at the back for the suspension to deal with.

and lets not forget the added weight to the drivetrain, a larger weight would decress accleration to some degree, and the list goes on

Edited by nobby

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...