Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

at least it was a stand out on the grid, something new... which is rare

this is just ugly and unimaginative... and from the side it bears a striking similarity to BMW's colour scheme

yep..i find it hard to believe that Honda dont even appear to have a single other sponsors name on their car... very confusing considering that Toyota have stacks more money and yet they have a bunch of sponsors on their car.

these photos are funny...

Rubens looks a kid standing next to Santa in this shot... go on Reubs..wet yourself, its okay!

post-33653-1201665288_thumb.jpg

and Jenson...oh Jenson, much more than this.... you did it YOOOOOUUUUUUUURRRR WWWAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY!

post-33653-1201665302_thumb.jpg

Ahahaha, you wish.

Poor bastard.

I get grand stand tickets every year but never use them, so if anybody wants to upgrade and sit at turn one on Saturday for qualifying all day, let me know you can BORROW my ticket.

... You still need your ticket to get into the track but once you’re in you can have mine for the day

yeah... when the side pods, bridge wing, bargeboards side pod winglets and numerous other parts are 'borrowed' from last years Mclaren, they're obviously onto a winning idea

they do have a much better nose on it tho

Well if you removed the paint schemes from the cars other than the different height keels for the front suspension I reckon even the most ardent train spotters would struggle to figure out which car is which.

I like the fact that the three top teams (Mclaren, Ferrari and Renault), while always ultra competitive always seem very different in most aspects... be it suspension, side pods and especially front wings

I would say that the rest of the grid are indiscernible from one another is solely because they are a stolen mish-mash of the top three’s design concepts both aerodynamic and mechanical

Yeah... its too bad not all of us are 100 years old and were around in that era, hey?

:D

Oh very fkn funny. Fkn newbs.

Actually if you want a good read go buy yourself a copy of the book 1982. Get it from Amazon & it will be cheaper than locally.

http://www.amazon.com/1982-Inside-Story-Se...6608&sr=8-1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...