Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hehe i'm cutting, but I still eat a cheeky burger or two every now and then... It doesn't really matter for me. Calories in vs calories out is more important to think about for losing weight than a high protein/low-carb diet only.

It would seem most people think they can eat as much protein and healthy fats as they want when cutting (when hungry) as long as they don't eat any carb sources.

Quote from http://thesmarterscienceofslim.com/eat-more-slim-down-and-thermodynamics/ :

Jonathan: And I think this kind of goes back to some studies we talked about earlier, even the woman’s health initiative study where we showed that in nearly 70,000 women over the course of 8 years. We had one group of women that consumed about 350,000 more calories than the other group. Using calorie math, that means they should of gained 100 more pounds. They gained less than a pound that that’s really nothing when you look over the course of 8 years. So, how is this possible, Carrie? This is mind-blowing. How can this even happen?

Calories more important?

Also are you sure you have your definition of carb sources correct?

Fuck I wanted to...probably should have. I can never bring myself to give other people advice at the gym though, cause I know how annoying it is when someone is trying to tell you how you should be doing things. They might not have minded being total noobs.

I usually scope it out, see how confident they are looking. Then open with 'are you open to suggestions?'

I never say anything to anybody... if they want advice they'd ask for it... my old man does but he's a PT so fair enough

I had a guy I've never seen do a single deadlift give advice to my wife on deadlifting... 1min after I was standing next to her helping with her set... I really felt like saying dude don't bother she probably lifts more than you anyway lol

Quote from http://thesmartersci...thermodynamics/ :

Calories more important?

Also are you sure you have your definition of carb sources correct?

If you read my reply I said a combination of low carb + a calorie deficit of a couple hundred = fat loss.

Not sure what that link was trying to explain, but I'd love to see some proper proof of the studies (sounds like some of the test groups had a lot more to lose in the first place).

Also, not sure what you mean by "definition of carb sources correct", but I'm referring to people who avoid eating all sorts of grains, simple sugars, etc.

Edit:

Had a slightly longer read through and chuckled a bit. Of course eating more calories in higher quality food is going to lead to more fat loss than eating less shitty food. It's called a balanced diet.

Limiting calories a lot also shocks the body to retain what fat it has in more extreme cases, so I'm also not surprised if that's what they're getting on about. Can't be bothered reading.

Edited by TM7GTR

If you read my reply I said a combination of low carb + a calorie deficit of a couple hundred = fat loss.

<cut>

I read it again, from reading your original post alone I was not clear of your point of view.

Your new post makes a lot more sense :)

Curious, what are your SLDL weight used vs your deadlift weight used? I've started doing SLDL's and I'm finding my working weight to be quite considerably lower than what I would use on regular deadlifts.

On a side note, having trouble keeping up with this high rep short rest time shit lol, want to go back to strength training, but I'll stick this new routine out a little while longer.

In what way are you finding it harder? Energy? Time? Cardio? My workout is pretty volume oriented - I'd wager that someone with slightly stronger 1RMs would have a hard time getting through it...not that their workout would be a breeze for me either. My point is, there are a thousand different ways to workout and if you haven't trained for it, it's always going to be challenging!

As for deadlifts...I started off doing SLDLs and got up to around 110-120kg x 10 on that...but recently swapped them out for regular deadlifts, and am finding the opposite to you - 90kg x 10 is comfortable, because the muscles I wasn't using for SLDL obviously have some catching up to do. That and regular deadlifts give me headspins by the 10th rep lol.

Conversely, I would say SLDL requiring more back work and a greater range of motion for that muscle group = less weight than normal deadlifts for you.

I would say my cardiovascular health is lacking somewhat lol, short of breath etc. This routine calls for 90 second rest times 8-12 reps, I'm used to taking upwards of 5 minutes with 5 reps so it is somewhat different! But I wanted to try something new...I'll stick to it and hopefully i will hit two birds with one stone (hypertrophy and fitness). No cardio atm

Interesting that you're the opposite. Just as an example my working sets for DL was 130x5 but I only SLDL tonight 70x9 and I felt my traps giving out before my hams, maybe I'm doing something wrong :/

New Ironedge equipment at my gym! Almost makes the painful renovations worthwhile...

iM1RZPfw_original.png

2wDZkXLt_original.png

ucKQWinT_original.png

TlMR5_fV_original.png

Made comment to the trainer on the left^ that it was a nice looking setup and should alleviate waiting times on existing squat racks...he looked at me like I was speaking another language...cert 3 douchebag.

In what way are you finding it harder? Energy? Time? Cardio? My workout is pretty volume oriented - I'd wager that someone with slightly stronger 1RMs would have a hard time getting through it...not that their workout would be a breeze for me either. My point is, there are a thousand different ways to workout and if you haven't trained for it, it's always going to be challenging!

As for deadlifts...I started off doing SLDLs and got up to around 110-120kg x 10 on that...but recently swapped them out for regular deadlifts, and am finding the opposite to you - 90kg x 10 is comfortable, because the muscles I wasn't using for SLDL obviously have some catching up to do. That and regular deadlifts give me headspins by the 10th rep lol.

Conversely, I would say SLDL requiring more back work and a greater range of motion for that muscle group = less weight than normal deadlifts for you.

My SLDL's are a fair bit stronger than my regular deads, I was doing around 145 x 6, and now I'm stuck around 130 x 3-4 on regular's because my grip always gives out..

Curious as to number of exercises, sets, and rest times of your workouts Birds?

Sounds a lot like the high volume training I do atm.

Btw, the new equipment looks sweet, I wish my gym would buy some kettlebells... Hell, we don't even have resistance bands.

Hoping a PTC Canberra is in development haha

My SLDL's are a fair bit stronger than my regular deads, I was doing around 145 x 6, and now I'm stuck around 130 x 3-4 on regular's because my grip always gives out..

Curious as to number of exercises, sets, and rest times of your workouts Birds?

Sounds a lot like the high volume training I do atm.

Btw, the new equipment looks sweet, I wish my gym would buy some kettlebells... Hell, we don't even have resistance bands.

Hoping a PTC Canberra is in development haha

Interesting - I find my grip lasts much longer on regular deads because of the grounding / position reset. It was always at it's limits (talking fingertips ready to drop) by the 10th rep of SLDL.

I do around 6 exercises per session, usually 6 sets of 10 reps. Rest times vary from 1-1.5 minutes for isolation or less strenuous compounds, and 2-3 minutes for the big three compound lifts.

Correct strength training will keep you in good nick cardio wise

Pierre was training for Nats in 2011, lots of heavy work, mostly 5's

He then did this, squatted 60kg x 137, I doubt any fitness buffs or cardio bunnies could do that, even if they trained for it

Pierre weighed 80kg and squatted 170kg at Nats 8 weeks later, pulled over 200kg

At the CAPO NAts 2011 in Albury, Pierre went 170/125/220 - 515kg@80kg in the Juniors

We have 4 lifters who have squatted 60kg x 100 or more reps and one female who squatted 60kg x 60 reps

All of these lifters compete at Powerlifting

Our 20 rep record is 162.5kg x 20, by an SAU forum member

Dont assume strong lifters are poor at cardio

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...