Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

no I probably wouldn't - I've been training and cleaned up my diet for 6 months now, but after reading your newsletters, the thought occurred to me that I might be under eating instead of eating more to build muscle, and therefore increase my BMR.

Possibly even to the point of just eating more meat and having less protein shakes.

It's unfortunate that I can't find anyone in my friend group who is interested in trying the PTC style of training (3 x a week compounds, 2x of cardio with weights), everyone is still dogmatic about the bodypart split thing!

Who are you training for? Yourself or someone else? Do what you want to do and prove to them when you're far stronger your choice was the better one

training for myself, and because recently i'd started to really wonder if trying to train like bodybuilders really suits normal people.

It is easier to train with other people than alone though.

Edited by bozodos

Bodybuilders are normal people, just like power lifters or race car drivers or firemen, they all just train to be good at something.

If you don't like the training style, trying something different.

There's a bazillion ways to train. It's pretty Power lift centric around here because we have Markos actively contributing, you could frequent another forum and see everyone advocating different training styles and in the end, you'll still look better and be stronger and fitter than you wold if you did nothing so just try things until you find what you enjoy most.

IF you enjoy it, you'll ave a better chance of sticking to it and conquering one of the most difficult aspects for some, the mental challenge of slugging it out again and again.

training for myself, and because recently i'd started to really wonder if trying to train like bodybuilders really suits normal people.

It is easier to train with other people than alone though.

I agree and disagree with your closIng statement. It annoys me to anger people that stuff around when they want to train 'with' me.

People that do the same as myself, yes, it is good to have a spotter when needed.

Edited by jangles

Well I was initially interested in the more powerlifting side (because to be honest what's the point of being big and/or shredded without having the strength to back it up), however the relative unaesthetic look of most powerlifters I'd seen had put me off.

Markos' methods have me interested because his lifters get serious results (well in excess of anyone I have seen locally whether they be 70kg or 100kg+) yet most of them look pretty good to boot, which says to me that he might have a pretty good idea of what he's doing for what I want to achieve.

I already know that curling like a bro isn't the answer, nor is Crossfit. I've done the 5 day split type training for a while now, but feel like a lot of the machine work and cable stuff was just a waste of time.It could be flawed logic as well, but I figure that my compound lifts are going to get better, faster, if I'm doing them more than once a week.

The question mark I have about training alone is yes having a spotter or someone to check my form if I'm still doing it wrong (as I have a tendency to have one foot behind the other when squatting for example). Easier to train alone in that you get through it a lot faster, and only have to rest until you are capable of the next set or exercise.

Edited by bozodos

Well I was initially interested in the more powerlifting side (because to be honest what's the point of being big and/or shredded without having the strength to back it up), however the relative unaesthetic look of most powerlifters I'd seen had put me off.

This obviously comes down to your goals and why you're in the gym, i.e. whether you're doing it for yourself or others. But in a society obsessed with image, looks hold more value than strength. So I tend to ask, what the point of being strong is, if you look like shit. I like powerlifting, but outside of powerlifting circles, gym forums and the sport itself...no one in the general public really gives a f**k what you can lift. It's a sport for the self. You tell most girls how much you can bench press and check out the not-so-sincere look of awe on her face; see how many brownie points it earns you on a date. Even your grandma will say "that's nice dear", aka cool story bro.

Meanwhile, some guy who can't deadlift 120kg, but has built a body of lean muscle and a six pack to boot, has guys asking how often he works out and girls asking what he can bench press. You can despise it all you like, but that's what our society is like. It's the reason so many people don't give a shit what they lift, as long as they look good. Hence bro curls, hence a workout full of isolation movements.

Now there's no reason you can't have both - many do. Afterall, I do believe the most efficient way to get looking good from gym work is to strength your way to it - hence I promote powerlifting movements for people who want to build good looking, muscular bodies. There are more benefits to being both strong and good looking, than one or the other. And it's not as if a fat powerlifter can't change their diet and trim down, then look a million bucks. People often forget that, the goals may be different, but bodybuilders still use powerlifting movements to build their bases.

But...if I had to choose between looks or strength...I'd take looks any day of the week. Simply because, in our society, you have more power than someone who could lift 3 times what you can.

But if I had to choose between them...I'd take looks any day of the week...simply because, in our society, you have more power than someone who could lift 3 times what you can.

Pretty much this.

Correct Dan, and that's precisely what I was getting at Birds,

It's vain, but I want to look strong as well as be strong, not interested in getting to single digit bodyfat or competing (at least at this point in my life). Markos' trainees and methods seem to work well for this from what I have seen, hence my interest in that particular method.

Given that I'm still obese (6ft /120kg /~28%bf) and relatively new to lifting still, I figured that getting strong and then having the aesthetic look as a side effect of eating correctly to be the best method for my goals rather than trying to do whatever celebrity workout or train like Ronnie Coleman.

Correct Dan, and that's precisely what I was getting at Birds,

It's vain, but I want to look strong as well as be strong, not interested in getting to single digit bodyfat or competing (at least at this point in my life). Markos' trainees and methods seem to work well for this from what I have seen, hence my interest in that particular method.

Given that I'm still obese (6ft /120kg /~28%bf) and relatively new to lifting still, I figured that getting strong and then having the aesthetic look as a side effect of eating correctly to be the best method for my goals rather than trying to do whatever celebrity workout or train like Ronnie Coleman.

That's certainly the way to go about it. Humans are mimickers, imitators...it's how we learn from a young age. But beyond a young age, this style of learning doesn't serve us very well. We often look at top level people and think that if we do what they do now, we will get what they got over years of training. It's like asking Lewis Hamiton how to drive a Formula 1 car...he could tell you, but it won't translate to good laptimes if you haven't had 10 years of cart racing experience under your belt.

Correct Dan, and that's precisely what I was getting at Birds,

It's vain, but I want to look strong as well as be strong, not interested in getting to single digit bodyfat or competing (at least at this point in my life). Markos' trainees and methods seem to work well for this from what I have seen, hence my interest in that particular method.

Given that I'm still obese (6ft /120kg /~28%bf) and relatively new to lifting still, I figured that getting strong and then having the aesthetic look as a side effect of eating correctly to be the best method for my goals rather than trying to do whatever celebrity workout or train like Ronnie Coleman.

"Diet is 70% of how we look and 30% how we train" I heard this once....

When I first started training 18months ago I was 86kg. I got down to 78kgs this February. I've gone back to 82-83kgs.

  • Training frequency is the same ie average 4 days per week
  • Training approach is slightly different; whole body workouts as opposed to body parts.
  • Strength is similar if not stronger (than when I was 78kgs)

Only difference is how much I eat. I eat a lot more now (in winter) than what I did before and not all of it is good, hence the increase in weight.

When at 78kg I was told I looked really lean and now at 83kg everyone is saying I look much bigger and look good. I do feel bigger but I felt better at 78kg!

Challenge for me now is to lose the little bit of fat I put on not lose weight. I can lose weight easily, but I don't want to lose muscle size nor strength. That might be impossible when dropping almost 5kg but I want to minimise it. Only way I'm going to do that is the correct diet ie not diet to lose weight but eat correctly to lose fat and maintain muscle. How I train wont have that large an effect on it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...