Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Turbo experts, I need you to confirm this. I bought an R33 GTR from a fellow SAU member in August. I was told that the engine was totally worked over and had N1 turbos. I just had a tune and it didn't make the power it should have. In fact the tuner said the turbo's came on like stock.

I've removed the heat shield but can't see any Serial Tags on the Turbos. Attached are some pictures of the compressor side. I used a magnet against the wheel and it will stick to the shaft/nut but not to the impeller. So that means these are stock ceramics right? And I've been running 1 bar low boost and 1.2 high boost. I'm a bit furious now! But I guess at least I found out before the ceramics let go and ruin my motor.

post-16200-1201139398_thumb.jpg post-16200-1201139413_thumb.jpg

[EDIT]

I think my may have been too quick to jump. I tested it again but with a multi-meter this time and the wheels conduct so they aren't ceramic. Odd that the magnet didn't stick. They must be some hybrid alloy that's non-ferris like stainless or perhaps titanium.

I'd still like a confirmation just for peace of mind in my assessment.

Thanks for the correction. Do I have egg on my face. Too much to learn.

Edited by Pezhead
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/202916-confirm-stock-turbo-r33-gtr/
Share on other sites

the compressors aren't ceramic mate, even on the stockers. They are made of alloy so no magnet sticks to them.

What you are looking for is ceramic exhaust turbines. Obviously on the exhaust side not the compressor side.

be carefull before going off about it.

^ As above. Pretty excited post over nothing far as i see it :)

You really need to know what your looking at... its meant to be the exhaust side dude.

Check the exhaust side, then let us know.

Alternatively check the ID plate on the turbos

The ceramic wheel on the turbine is on the exhaust side, so dumps would need to come off to truly see what you have if theres no serial numbers.

As to why the magnet doesnt stick to the intake blades, could it be inconel (or whatever its called, special alloy) maybe a magnet doesnt stick to it?

With a A/R42 front housing it could still be garrett -7 N1's.......

Thanks for the quick reply fellas.

I've amended my earlier post. I'm still trying to figure out why the car is low on power. I guess I was a bit hot too from working two hours just to get the exhaust shield off but still can't see the turbo serial no's. No excuse for me.

Should I check the exhaust sides too? I'm reassured by the shop that did the work that they are N1's with reworked stock housings. Since the original owner ran high boost all the time I guess these must be at least steel or they'd blown by now.

I did get the original receipts but they don't list the actual parts since some were bought second hand. The original worked motor was purchased and freshened before it went into my car. Don't have the original parts receipts.

Maybe I'm just paranoid, the car does have most of the other goodies listed, but a few are missing - oil cooler and alum radiator that were originally on the ad.

Edited by Pezhead

I've seen Seb's car around previously including at Eastern Creek track days, and it was definately making good power on big turbos. Of course thats no guarantee that something hasn't ben changed but it used to go great.

What power did it make, and at what boost. What were the compression test results. What is the cam timing set to assuming it is adjustable? Does it have upgraded cams?

.42 AR compressor housing is stock size. my stab is that they are stock turbos, or perhaps rebuilt stock turbos. check the rear housing and look for A/R. it should be 0.64 if it is then they are something decent. :)

Thanks Fellas. Sorry for the panic earlier, I read a few posts where people were suggesting the Magnet check and turns out it doesn't work at all. I'm a bit tired from working in the hot garage - what a sweat box!

I can't really get to see the rears unless I unbolt the dump pipes and a lot more stuff so going to wait for an exhaust upgrade or something before I do that.

I did check the cam gears and they are HKS adjustable. Intake is set to 7 degrees advance, 0 advance on exhaust. I wanted to check the cams too but thought I'd check the lift through the oil filler before I take off the valve cover. I used my digital calipers to measure the distance from the bottom of the oil filler seat to the cam lobe. Lift looks like about 9.8 mm but could be off since my crude method of measurement.

Don't get me wrong. The car makes great power and drives terrific. I'm trying to go through everything now and ensure that the machine is in tip top shape and do the mods necessary to ensure the longevity of the motor and parts.

1) add 19 row oil cooler since it doesn't have one at all and oil hits 90 degrees just doing street driving

2) big radiator upgrade - the M-spec Alum version from here

3) gotta do something about intake temps. temp is 50-60 degrees off boost on a 20-25 degree day. Engine bay is very hot and pods are pulling in the hot air. Want to enclose the pods, but they are bigger than normal and will require a lot of custom box building.

4) cat has split open due to road rash (is the lowest part of the car)

5) new Trust/Greddy suspension on the way (but back ordered darn!) to get the car back up in height to solve cat prob and even out camber on the front wheels

6) Oil pressure and water temp gauges so I can keep a better eye on things

I think the tune I bought it with was a bit off. UAS was able to significantly increase the power without sacrifice to mid-range. It was only making 180 rwkw @ 18 psi when I drove it in and now at 253 rwkw @ 17 psi (interesting 1 psi drop from original tune). Even they say their dyno reads a bit low compared to others. Seb said the car made 320 kw @ 21 psi. I originally thought the high boost was set there but it is not.

By the way. Low boost @ 1 bar is fully in before 4000 rpm and high boost 17/18 psi all in before 4400 rpm. Does that sound 'bout right for N1's?

Trying to make sure I'm confident in everything before I try turning up any more boost. I've had sports cars before but nothing like the GTR (which is why I had to have one). I knew buying a modified car would force me to climb the steep learning curve on import tuner's.

Thanks again for your help guys. I'm up for the challenge.

Its got a big trust imitation intercooler, 550 cc Nismo injectors, Autronic SM2, HKS EVC and 044 pump with rising rate reg & surge tank. Tuners said that the fuel system works great and held constant 12:1 at full boost (raising from 14:1 at low end).

I'm a bit stumped because the tuners thought the turbos should come in earlier too.

I'm also getting terrible mileage too. Car was getting about 250k's per fill (filled at 1/4 tank) and now is only marginally better at about 280. I've read up and most folks are getting a lot more with same or more power.

Could this be an exhaust restriction?

Thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...