Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 569
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

did you buy it for Duncan the Autosalon whore ?

hey I need to stay across what my competitors are up to.

who wouldn't want a gorgeous girl draped across the bonnet of a pristine car

promo11.jpg

:thumbsup:

mm woud love that spoiler on the 34..

where do i get one?!?

if you mean the rear wing I bought it from C-west. it's a super GT wing, with extra gurney flap. not cheap but it's the real deal and it works! to get the most out of it though you need to have a frame under it like mark has built to transfer that downforce to the chassis, otherwise it's just going to push in your boot lid!

oh, and a small update on the car. doing some tyre testing at eastern creek this last weekend mark managed to run a 1:37 which is damn fast. but of as always there is more to come....

Something of interest that others may be able to answer, can Time Attack cars such as the Hi Octane beast run anti-lag (i.e. Gr. A) during racing, assuming a capable ecu? That might be a really stupid question.

Also, by the looks of it the exhausts merge to a single pipe exiting out the side. Would there not be any advantage in having two separate pipes out of the back of each turbo, or would that be "clutching straws" in terms of any additional performance.

Sorry if I am way off.

oh, and a small update on the car. doing some tyre testing at eastern creek this last weekend mark managed to run a 1:37 which is damn fast. but of as always there is more to come....

the aust superbike series which is the litre class run mid 30's @ the creek with race slicks and have every mod possible worth over 200k and have a huge power/weight advantage which exceeds 1/1 (200+hp/160kg), this gtr is a demon to run these times

the aust superbike series which is the litre class run mid 30's @ the creek with race slicks and have every mod possible worth over 200k and have a huge power/weight advantage which exceeds 1/1 (200+hp/160kg), this gtr is a demon to run these times

I can only really compare the time to some of the Porsche's i have worked on (996 GT2 and 996 Cup Car)

http://www.natsoft.com.au/cgi-bin/results..../2009.EAST.S2.Y

The top 2 are the cars i mean, and those times are on slicks!

This GTR is very very fast. It certainly is packing a fair bit of power to make up for the grip deficit though!

what mods are the porsches carrying to do a 35?

my brother bought his gtr from paul whitemarsh who used to also race in the porsche cup, he owns the wharf at pyrmont. he stated that his stock gtr was quicker @ wakefield than his race prepped porsche, true story

what mods are the porsches carrying to do a 35?

my brother bought his gtr from paul whitemarsh who used to also race in the porsche cup, he owns the wharf at pyrmont. he stated that his stock gtr was quicker @ wakefield than his race prepped porsche, true story

Must have been a slow Porsche Cup Car, i'd say he means the old Porsche Cup which had a few classes. Not the Carrera Cup that was just canned. The "Cup Car" i speak of is the 996 which used to race in the one make series.

The GT2 has revalved shocks (no damper adjustment, only height as standard), different springs, stock sway bars, stock calipers and standard sized disc's. Obviously runs fairly aggressive pads. Stock aero. Now runs a full cage.

Engine is rebuilt (basically to stock specs) after it had a bit of a failure at Drive Bathurst but it's very average compared to this R34 GTR. Standard GT2 intercoolers and turbo's but with external water spray. Increased boost. Straight pipes. Slightly different intake. Makes approx 365rwkw so it's no power house. Weighs in at about 1300kg without driver. Runs Michelin Slicks.

It's done a 1:03 at WP on Yokohama semi's when Warren Luff drove it for Dutton 2 years ago. Now does flat 60's at WP on the Michelin Slicks driven by the owner. Does 1:12's at OP GP being driven by the owner.

That 1:35 at EC was also the owner driving.

brilliant car guys - i was the dorky dude pretty much drooling on this car on the weekend at ec. i was stoked i got to see this car in flesh. total monster.

you should have come and introduced yourself. :P all the guys are friendly and we all like meeting other enthusiasts who are interested in what mark and russ have built.

I can only really compare the time to some of the Porsche's i have worked on (996 GT2 and 996 Cup Car)

http://www.natsoft.com.au/cgi-bin/results..../2009.EAST.S2.Y

The top 2 are the cars i mean, and those times are on slicks!

This GTR is very very fast. It certainly is packing a fair bit of power to make up for the grip deficit though!

glad you liked it :P it's actually probably not got as much power as you might think! well, certainly a lot more than a cup car I guess.... and yeah it would be even faster on slicks. but there is still time left to get on semis. it's only done two real meets so far and 1 or 2 other small tests so there are still a few little bits and pieces to iron out. it is impressive though to consider how fast it is on small 265 wide road legal yokohma A050 semi slicks. they are doing a good job of keeping it on the black stuff!

but to be fair hibbards porcsche is pretty special and it's a GT2 and of course they really get the most out of their nice wide slicks. and most 996 cup cars run around in the low-mid 40s at eastern creek. :)

and yeak marko, that's not a cup car. cup cars are built by porsche motorsport (inc integrated cage etc) and as a control class very few changes made by their owners/tuners. we ran a 996 cup car for a few years in prod sports. they are super fast for what they are. certainly a 996 GT3 cup car is much, much faster than a stock GTR but they should be, they are purpose built race cars and run on slicks and when new a 996 GT3 Cup Car was about $250K. they are not stupidly powerful though. most 996 cup cars only put out around 280rwkw, but they have a very nice torque curve.

Mark did great on the weekend but frankly I think with another couple of years testing and development, and a bit more money that he can take a genuine 2 further sec of this time. Its very early days for this car and the boys haven't got into serious testing of different setups yet.

This will be a hell of a car once it has that time under it's belt.

  • 1 month later...

Hi Russ :)

How have you been? Have you guys installed the passenger seat for your sponsors in the 34 yet? If not do you need a hand? I'm sure I could figure it out & I promise to be the Guinea p i g on the first run to make sure it's safely bolted in :D

Edited by Miss BNR32
btw if ya need something sandblasted, let me know
Hay dude mad build aye just wonderin i recently did a drink drive number on my 32 yeah i know man belive me i was well broken down anyway its not bad no twistin or anything just a fifty sign at about 70 the sign came straght out theres a little inside skin damage but not much anyway i'm down with getting my car stripped and blasted or whats the acid dipping worth and would i need to take all loom out or is acid dipping just an expression, any help appreciated
ok this thread is for info on the new build up of the r34 time attack car ,

i will post some previous info and then update with new stuff as we build it.

Hay dude just wonderin also what the go on your 30 block is i'm thinkin the same path for mine but want a good mix between throttle and bottom end anyway if you've done it can ya let me know how much of a hassle it was connecting the diff to it i'm thinking v cam when i have the money so 30 would be the way to go if it not to costly icon14.gif

Well, we took the beast to QR yesterday to test some wheel alignment/sway bar, and ride height changes and Mark very kindly allowed me a session in the car.

Needless to say it's ruined me for life, words can describe it but I'm summarise and just say THE THING IS FARKING AWESOME!

Thanks again to Mark and Russ (aka Giant) to allow me to skid the weapon :P;):P:blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...