Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Well im going to be doing the cams in my car in the next month or two and have been reading a lot about what to go for. I know a lot of people use the GT-RS turbo for street use so just wanted to get a feal on what people have found to be the best setup. Now im not really going for top end power, mainly to get as much bottem end and torque through out the rev range so bare that in mind.

I've narrowed it down to 256 Poncams with 8.5mm lift on the intake and exhaust. This is what my tuner has recommended aswell for the best "street" setup. I'll change the springs to tomei's aswell which are rated at 8.8mm lift. Would 264 degree cams start losing what i want (bottem end power) or would people recommend that over 256's? Most people go 256's because you don't have to change springs, but if i'm going to be changing them maybe the 264's would be the way to go.

Is it worthwhile doing any headporting/polish or anything at the same time with this setup or would the gain vs money be pretty much fark all? (I should be able to get headwork done at an ok price so maybe it would be worth it?) I've read its mainly for a bit more extreme setups where you notice good gains though

Just wanted some input from a few people on what they have found to work the best with a setup similar to mine to get the most out of this turbo. There's a lot of threads about cams, but usually its with people just wanting to throw the biggest cams that they can get their hands on for big top end which is not what i want.

Thanks

Phil

I have Poncams in mine.And it gives good response and mid range.If you are changing the springs why not look at getting HKS 256 intake and 264 exhaust?

As for the head i would leave it alone as the cost starts to climb and the benefit is marginal with a street setup like you are after.

^^ same route followed a while ago with my RB25.

Response/power was no different to those with cams in the end after comparing a few results mine really was not all that different.

Depends if your tuner knows what's going on

Pretty much running a microtech so no VCT, after discussing about running an external VCT controller with my tuner he said it can be done, problem is if the controller fails and the tune is setup for the VCT being active (due to it running different cam setup or whatever it actually does to the cam when active) it can cause damage to the engine with the tune not corresponding to the cam. I'm probably wording that a bit wrong, in my understanding i guess it could start knocking with the tune not being setup for the right cam timing?

I've compared my dyno graph with a couple of people that have cams and all of them have a lot more midrange and bottem end power, which is what im mainly after.

With the 264 on the exhaust side, what kind of difference would that make compared to a 256 on the exhaust? Talking like real world driving differences.

Edited by PM-R33

the cars that you compared them to... were they VCT enabled though?

sorry for the threadjack but i'm in a similar boat... and have been told by a very reputable tuner not to go that way...

although i have a PFC and vct still

All good mate, the more information we can get the better for both of us.

Yeah you're right, they may have had VCT enabled because one was running a power FC and the others im not sure about. So annoying that aftermarket shit doesn't support a VCT feature. Hmm so many tough descisions and so much money involved. I just want more midrange power and a lot of people i have talked to all say that with cams the GT-RS comes alive, so i dunno.

I was thinking the smaller duration cams (256's) with more lift over factory would give that better midrange power compared to 264's which would move the power curve up a bit.

Why did your tuner say not to go with cams? Surely some poncams or equivalent would make more power in the rev range then standard cams?

Edited by PM-R33

tomei poncams work with VCT and are the usual choice to go with a gtrs

smaller cams can make less peak power but have a better transient response... i.e. comes on boost faster...

(or so is my understanding anyway...)

ash? *looks around thread*

I went the HKS route with the 256 in and 264 out. Haven't got the car back yet so can't give you real life experience but from what people told me they go the larger exhaust cam to help get those gasses out but get the smaller duration intake for a less lumpy ride in the street car.

I have a HKS 256 duration intake cam I'm trying to get rid of ... the one that retains the VCT (I went adjustable pulleys and bought the wrong intake cam :no: )if you decide to go down that path. Never been used and a lot cheaper than a shop. Drop me a pm if your interested

the 256deg poncams should bring the boost threshold down and should make more everywhere. mild head work and port matching can definitely lower the boost threshold as well.

it comes down to $$'s whether you feel its worth it. total extra hp won't necesarily be massively higher maybe 15-25kw but response will be pretty hard to beat as the power curve should be moved to the left.

AFAIK all the microtechs have an auxillary output, why not set that up to the vct. I had an old digi, and even that had am rpm aux output.

Really? I didn't know that. So i can set up this auxillary output as an RPM switch to go off the solenoid on the intake cam? Don't suppose you know how to do this?

I went the HKS route with the 256 in and 264 out. Haven't got the car back yet so can't give you real life experience but from what people told me they go the larger exhaust cam to help get those gasses out but get the smaller duration intake for a less lumpy ride in the street car.

I have a HKS 256 duration intake cam I'm trying to get rid of ... the one that retains the VCT (I went adjustable pulleys and bought the wrong intake cam )if you decide to go down that path. Never been used and a lot cheaper than a shop. Drop me a pm if your interested

Yeah let me know how you go mate.

the 256deg poncams should bring the boost threshold down and should make more everywhere. mild head work and port matching can definitely lower the boost threshold as well.

it comes down to $$'s whether you feel its worth it. total extra hp won't necesarily be massively higher maybe 15-25kw but response will be pretty hard to beat as the power curve should be moved to the left.

That's the main thing i want, as much low down power as physically possible, so if i could get the VCT working and get the Poncams in, i'll be a happy man. I'll find out from my mate how much machining of the head will cost me, if it aint too much might aswell clean it up a bit.

Ok i had a look through the Microtech manual and for the Aux RPM output function it says it works by switching a device on at a certain RPM that you program in. However, for the VCT you need the opposite, have it active from say 1000rpm or so, and then you want something to switch it off at say 4500rpm or whatever it goes to.

So could this be somehow rigged up to work?

whats the reason you are going for microtech?

ive driven my car with VCT unplugged and its just sluggish and lacks power

im not sure it will "kill the engine" it would be unreasonable for the engine to fail if the VCT system is disconnected or fails

the engine check light doesnt even come on if the system fails, theres no active check for VCT in the ECU train so its not an essential part

ie oil pressure and temperature are and can be fatal, hence they have sensors and throw the engine light on when they fail or an idiot light

external VCT boxes;

http://www.apexi-usa.com/product_gizzmo_de...7&pageNum=1

http://www.nengun.com/power-enterprise/camcon

either of those should give you some external VCT control

it would probably be easier, cheaper and more reliable to use an ECU that supports VCT out of the box

have you brought the cams yet? if not, dont - try the car without the cams

its a big capital outlay and you find its for zero to minor gains

much like a front plenum change - zero to almost zero gains for $1000 ish

whats the reason you are going for microtech?

Allready in the car and fully tuned, car runs sweet other the the VCT not working. If it gives me some gains down low in the rev range id like to get it working. Free power in a way.

ive driven my car with VCT unplugged and its just sluggish and lacks power

im not sure it will "kill the engine" it would be unreasonable for the engine to fail if the VCT system is disconnected or fails

Hmm yeah i dont know, tuner just said if the tune is done for the VCT being active, and then it fails, it could cause the engine to knock. I suppose it depends how aggressive the tune is done.

external VCT boxes;

http://www.apexi-usa.com/product_gizzmo_de...7&pageNum=1

http://www.nengun.com/power-enterprise/camcon

either of those should give you some external VCT control

it would probably be easier, cheaper and more reliable to use an ECU that supports VCT out of the box

Yeah they are fairly expensive ways to do it thats the only problem, for the same money i can pretty much do the cams. Yeah i agree that a ECU that supports VCT would be great but at the time a Power FC was hard to find and i went the Microtech route and im happy with the choice, other then the VCT problem lol.

have you brought the cams yet? if not, dont - try the car without the cams

its a big capital outlay and you find its for zero to minor gains

much like a front plenum change - zero to almost zero gains for $1000 ish

Nah dont have cams yet. There are a lot of people on here that are against cams and i dont understand why? Obviously the power difference isn't going to be huge but for $800 odd dollars for Poncams to gain power throughout the rev range i reckon its worth it. (I know a few cars that have done cams and none of those people regret doing them saying that there was no difference in power in the revs, maybe not top end power but down low definetely).

EDIT: Microtech can in fact run the VCT through the aux rpm output as stated above by Adriano, there is an aux rpm on and a aux rpm off function it in so this can be set for the VCT!

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...