Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, so we've all seen it done, but doesn't it just pi5s you off!? Police 'setting a bad example'.

They get away with it but do us over for doing much less or sometimes we get pulled over and done and we haven't even done anything. sometimes what they do is just plain wrong but they're cops so i guess that makes it right...?

Ok, i'll back it up with an example, in fact, i even have video footage this time!

My mate Jus and i thought it was strange that two cops in a marked sedan last night come up behind us on springvale road with no siren but lights, and couldn't get through waverley road intersection because all poll positions were full - so they turned their lights off, waited in the right turning lane for the right arrow, then when they had a clear lane (car in front turned right) they turned their lights back on and beat the traffic through....

we were behind them on springvale road, still no siren then they turned their lights off and kept cruising. We thought that was strange, so Jus turned on his camera phone to video it and the same thing happened at ferntree gully road t-intersection!

ok...so here's where it gets bad.

After they got through the intersection they turned into Coles and turned their lights off then went and found a park to go shopping! Geez it makes me furious!

Anyways, i also know of a cop, who told me a story in passing that when they want to pick up a pizza, so that it doesn't get cold they use their emergency lights to get it back to the cop shop while it's still hot.

Is that really an emergency? does it annoy anybody as much as it angers me!? Got any stories to share to upset my day even more??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214452-setting-a-bad-example/
Share on other sites

The worst part about those situations is that people will often move out of the way to let police through as youre meant to. This often involves moving out into intersections or into different lanes which can be quite dangerous in some occasions. If they were really pushing through (sirens, lights) then it should of been reported. However, you dont know if there was an issue at coles either unless you stayed around to watch them come out or followed them in.

Each situation would be different, they may have been rushing to buy pain killers for another officer, who knows.

If they do abuse the pwoer then it is wrong though.

Good point DogKnight!

I didn't stick around an walk in after them, but did pull into car park and they parked in a normal spot and casually got out of their car. If it were a situation, then wouldn't they have parked next to the front door in the loading zone marked yellow? hmmm

anyways, still no replies in this topic about the pizza! damn emergency if you get a cold pizza, all pizza drivers should have these privledges haha :blink:

hi,

its illegal to follow any emergency vehicle

they may have been called to a situation, which was later withdrawn

I was doing 80 (speed limit) on Springvale, they must have been cruising at 100-ish and got away. At Waverley lights after they took off i was in poll and got the green i could see them in a distance...and caught up with them when they stopped at Ferntree Gully road at the red when it happened again. That's when Jus decided to get the video out cause it was strange, and Coles is immediately after Ferntree Gully on the left 2nd driveway so it wasn't hard to see them go in there. I took the 3rd driveway into Video Easy, my destination, and saw them park. Nothing illegal there.

I dont think we need another thread about Police do we?

I mean, if you think you have a legit complaint... lodge it with the Ombudsman and let that department sort it out.

This forum really isnt the place for this kinda thing as it doesnt achieve anything and threads like this just go off on long winded tangents before page 2

There's plenty of situations they could have been in where all of their actions are perfectly legitimate.

They might have been in a hurry to get to a job, but not in so much of a hurry that they need to race through red lights and push other cars out of the way.

Lights without sirens, nothing strange about that. The sirens are used to alert other drivers of their presence. If they're driving down the road with no obstruction, then they can turn off lights and sirens...Once they hit traffic they'll put the lights and/or sirens back on as they're needed.

I dont think we need another thread about Police do we?

I mean, if you think you have a legit complaint... lodge it with the Ombudsman and let that department sort it out.

This forum really isnt the place for this kinda thing as it doesnt achieve anything and threads like this just go off on long winded tangents before page 2

We ALWAYS need these treads, go have a nap nancy boy :D

Reminds me of the drive back from Tamboon this year, I pulled up next to a car with it's lights on but no siren, the female in the passenger seat was a bit of a hottie so I wound down my window and asked since when do police stop at traffic lights with their own lights on....they were suitable embarrassed and switched them off :laugh:

Just the other day i saw (well heard it first) a new VE commo, comin blitzin from one roundabout (took in the inside right, didnt go around) booted it thru a school zone, like, this thing was really strugglin for traction, past all the bus stops full of kids, then took the inside right on the next roundabout, and booted it again! He was easily doin 120k+, in an unmarked car, no lights, no sirens, at like 4 in the afternoon. The only reason i know it was a cop was i saw the blue shirt with shoulder patch. What would've happened if a kid stepped out?! UNbelievable, and seriously stupid!

Plenty of occupations have a blue shirt with a patch on the shoulder...and anyone can buy a CE commo...did it have a heap of aerials...anything else to identify it as a cop car...?

Yea, it had the aerials on the rear quarters, and the rear window, and i reckon i saw the light cluster on the dash, and in the rear window corners. I was standing on the footpath, so could see in the car pretty well, and it was a uniformed cop.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...