Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

fwaah, chek out the 32GTR in the bground...now that looks sweet!

:) you can't argue with motor sport pedigree! :rolleyes:

Whens the last time you say a 33gtst racing in Group A! Oh hang on, never saw a 32gtst run there either....

damn, that pintara is looking attractive now. CA20e's aren't they?

But the RB20 won the SATCC in 1990, and won several JTCC. That engine ended up in the R32, save the manifold and turbo. Neither the RB25 or R33 had done anyting except cruise Oxford Street with Pin Pearl paint, 20" chrmoies and yellow leather interior :blink:

Stop finding flaws in my nonsense rambling, it isnt meant to make sense :P

Dont S2 R33s have that tacky clith interior? They do look nicer then the S1 though. And the interior, just like the exterior is very much a matter of taste as the R33 is too Camry for me. Then again teh R32 is very VN Commodore :bunny:

I happen to have driven these 3... 1st car was 91 VN, 2nd 02 Camry & finally a 93 R33 ... what are the chances...

& to the OP, if you are coming from a Excel, then even a push bike is probably an upgrade from that... LOL :laugh: .

GL with your skyline.

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

thats the best looking fridge i have ever seen! Who left it in the car park :laugh: nice looking washing machine in the back ground too.

Team white goods?

Wait! i have a better one: Just cos your car is too big to fit in a parking slot, doesn't mean you can take 3 :bunny:

have i mentioned this thread has out lived it's usefulness?

Edited by BHDave
to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? ;)

speaking for myself and alot like my friends, we always prefered the shape of the R32 before we owned one.

tuff street style. but hey, that's us. we're all different.

everyone on here knows the RB25 is better stock to stock. newer technology, better response with bigger turbos, and can acheive a higher power rating.

everyone has their personal preference. i know if i wanted to go out and get higher in the power figures i would use an RB25.. even over an RB26. but i've got what i've got, and it surely does what i want it to do with ease.

we own RB engines, so we should be arguing with SR or CA owners, not ourselves.

my point was that the main argument from R32 owners is that 'R33's look shit' which is a stupid thing to say because its personal taste. if the worst thing they can say about an R33 is that it looks shit, then it must be a pretty good car. end of story.

"lets be frank: our 33V-Spec looks like a boat against the other three. It's the least aggressive in its styling and more closely cut from the generic Skyline cloth..."

- Motor Magazine, May 2008

article: r32 v r33 v r34 v r35 (gtrs)

lol...

MOTOR, the Holden specialists :thumbsup:

Thats a nice lookin gtst.. and it looks like a gtst but the color suits it perfectly.. :P

In my opinion, and i said it wayyy back in this thread.. i dont like R33's. i prefer the r32 LOOKS wise..

R33 is faster than the R32, is newer and blah blah blah.. R32 with rb25/26 is the best option i reckon because i love the look of the R32. but thats my personal opinion

As for my "blown" motor.. it never blew champ :) 1 of the turbos exploded

A couple pieces of the wheel managed to somehow go back into the engine and score the bores. no biggie :(

GTR front bar without the lip?? looks different lol but good

or other front bar.. whatever it is it looks nice, but we had a nice clean White R33 GTR @ work the other day... only had a set of wheels and it looked Gold

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...